支持向量机与k近邻梯度金字塔直方图的对比分析

Imantoko Imantoko, Arief Hermawan, Donny Avianto
{"title":"支持向量机与k近邻梯度金字塔直方图的对比分析","authors":"Imantoko Imantoko, Arief Hermawan, Donny Avianto","doi":"10.31940/MATRIX.V11I2.2433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The communication method using sign language is very efficient considering that the speed of information delivery is closer to verbal communication (speaking) compared to writing or typing. Because of this, sign language is often used by people who are deaf, speech impaired, and normal people to communicate. To make sign language translation easier, a system is needed to translate symbols formed from hand movements (in the form of images) into text or sound. This study aims to compare performance such as accuracy and computation time of Support Vector Machine (SVM) and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) with Pyramidal Histogram of Gradient (PHOG) for feature extraction, to know which one is better at recognizing sign language. Yield, both combined methods PHOG-SVM and PHOG-KNN can recognize images from hand movements that form certain symbols. The system built using the SVM classification produces the highest accuracy of 82% at PHOG level 3, while the system built with the KNN classification produces the highest accuracy of 78% at PHOG level 2. The total computation time of the fastest training and testing by the SVM model is 236.53 seconds at PHOG level 3, while the KNN model is 78.27 seconds at PHOG level 3. In terms of accuracy, PHOG-SVM is better, but in terms of computation time, PHOG-KNN takes the place.","PeriodicalId":31964,"journal":{"name":"Matrix Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi dan Informatika","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative analysis of support vector machine and k-nearest neighbors with a pyramidal histogram of the gradient for sign language detection\",\"authors\":\"Imantoko Imantoko, Arief Hermawan, Donny Avianto\",\"doi\":\"10.31940/MATRIX.V11I2.2433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The communication method using sign language is very efficient considering that the speed of information delivery is closer to verbal communication (speaking) compared to writing or typing. Because of this, sign language is often used by people who are deaf, speech impaired, and normal people to communicate. To make sign language translation easier, a system is needed to translate symbols formed from hand movements (in the form of images) into text or sound. This study aims to compare performance such as accuracy and computation time of Support Vector Machine (SVM) and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) with Pyramidal Histogram of Gradient (PHOG) for feature extraction, to know which one is better at recognizing sign language. Yield, both combined methods PHOG-SVM and PHOG-KNN can recognize images from hand movements that form certain symbols. The system built using the SVM classification produces the highest accuracy of 82% at PHOG level 3, while the system built with the KNN classification produces the highest accuracy of 78% at PHOG level 2. The total computation time of the fastest training and testing by the SVM model is 236.53 seconds at PHOG level 3, while the KNN model is 78.27 seconds at PHOG level 3. In terms of accuracy, PHOG-SVM is better, but in terms of computation time, PHOG-KNN takes the place.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31964,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Matrix Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi dan Informatika\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Matrix Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi dan Informatika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31940/MATRIX.V11I2.2433\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Matrix Jurnal Manajemen Teknologi dan Informatika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31940/MATRIX.V11I2.2433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

与书写或打字相比,信息传递的速度更接近口头交流(说话),因此使用手语的交流方法非常有效。正因为如此,聋哑人、语言障碍者和正常人经常使用手语进行交流。为了使手语翻译更容易,需要一个系统将手势(以图像形式)形成的符号翻译成文本或声音。本研究旨在比较支持向量机(SVM)和k近邻(KNN)与梯度金字塔直方图(PHOG)在特征提取方面的精度和计算时间等性能,以了解哪一种方法在识别手语方面更好。结果表明,PHOG-SVM和PHOG-KNN两种组合方法都可以从手部运动中识别出形成一定符号的图像。使用SVM分类构建的系统在PHOG级别3上的准确率最高,为82%,而使用KNN分类构建的系统在PHOG级别2上的准确率最高,为78%。SVM模型在PHOG level 3下的最快训练和测试总计算时间为236.53秒,KNN模型在PHOG level 3下的最快训练和测试总计算时间为78.27秒。在精度方面,PHOG-SVM更胜一筹,但在计算时间方面,PHOG-KNN更胜一筹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative analysis of support vector machine and k-nearest neighbors with a pyramidal histogram of the gradient for sign language detection
The communication method using sign language is very efficient considering that the speed of information delivery is closer to verbal communication (speaking) compared to writing or typing. Because of this, sign language is often used by people who are deaf, speech impaired, and normal people to communicate. To make sign language translation easier, a system is needed to translate symbols formed from hand movements (in the form of images) into text or sound. This study aims to compare performance such as accuracy and computation time of Support Vector Machine (SVM) and K-Nearest Neighbors (KNN) with Pyramidal Histogram of Gradient (PHOG) for feature extraction, to know which one is better at recognizing sign language. Yield, both combined methods PHOG-SVM and PHOG-KNN can recognize images from hand movements that form certain symbols. The system built using the SVM classification produces the highest accuracy of 82% at PHOG level 3, while the system built with the KNN classification produces the highest accuracy of 78% at PHOG level 2. The total computation time of the fastest training and testing by the SVM model is 236.53 seconds at PHOG level 3, while the KNN model is 78.27 seconds at PHOG level 3. In terms of accuracy, PHOG-SVM is better, but in terms of computation time, PHOG-KNN takes the place.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信