具有非对称偏离目标成本、确定性过程漂移和延迟动力学的死区调整图

A. Luceño
{"title":"具有非对称偏离目标成本、确定性过程漂移和延迟动力学的死区调整图","authors":"A. Luceño","doi":"10.1046/J.1467-9884.2003.00375.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary.  Feed-back control systems are a type of process control method in which a quantitative quality characteristic is measured at regular intervals of time, successive measures are used to estimate the current mean deviation of the quality characteristic from the target and, when necessary, adjustments of an input compensatory variable are made to bring the estimated process mean back to the target. Important problems to be solved are how often to sample the quality characteristic and when and by how much to apply an adjustment, i.e. to determine the optimal sampling interval, action limits and amount of adjustment. This determination may be done to minimize the long run cost resulting from the combined effects of the costs of taking each observation, of making each adjustment and of being off target. When the adjustment cost is zero, adjustments are made at each sampling point (this is a repeated adjustment scheme). However, when the cost of making an adjustment is important, two different action limits must be chosen and an adjustment must be made only when the current estimate of the mean deviation of the quality characteristic from target jumps outside the action limits (this is a dead band scheme). We consider three situations requiring asymmetric action limits; these are deterministic process drift, asymmetric off-target costs and asymmetric underlying distributions. Deterministic process drift is often caused by tool wear. Asymmetric costs may be due to asymmetric tolerances and/or to different costs of exceeding positive and negative tolerances. Asymmetric distributions sometimes appear in essentially positive quality characteristics. In addition, we consider the possibility that there is a delay in taking appropriate actions; this delay is often caused by the tests and procedures that are required to sample the process.","PeriodicalId":83973,"journal":{"name":"The Statistician : journal of the Institute of Statisticians","volume":"3 1","pages":"501-514"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dead band adjustment charts with asymmetric off‐target costs, deterministic process drift and delayed dynamics\",\"authors\":\"A. Luceño\",\"doi\":\"10.1046/J.1467-9884.2003.00375.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary.  Feed-back control systems are a type of process control method in which a quantitative quality characteristic is measured at regular intervals of time, successive measures are used to estimate the current mean deviation of the quality characteristic from the target and, when necessary, adjustments of an input compensatory variable are made to bring the estimated process mean back to the target. Important problems to be solved are how often to sample the quality characteristic and when and by how much to apply an adjustment, i.e. to determine the optimal sampling interval, action limits and amount of adjustment. This determination may be done to minimize the long run cost resulting from the combined effects of the costs of taking each observation, of making each adjustment and of being off target. When the adjustment cost is zero, adjustments are made at each sampling point (this is a repeated adjustment scheme). However, when the cost of making an adjustment is important, two different action limits must be chosen and an adjustment must be made only when the current estimate of the mean deviation of the quality characteristic from target jumps outside the action limits (this is a dead band scheme). We consider three situations requiring asymmetric action limits; these are deterministic process drift, asymmetric off-target costs and asymmetric underlying distributions. Deterministic process drift is often caused by tool wear. Asymmetric costs may be due to asymmetric tolerances and/or to different costs of exceeding positive and negative tolerances. Asymmetric distributions sometimes appear in essentially positive quality characteristics. In addition, we consider the possibility that there is a delay in taking appropriate actions; this delay is often caused by the tests and procedures that are required to sample the process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Statistician : journal of the Institute of Statisticians\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"501-514\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Statistician : journal of the Institute of Statisticians\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1467-9884.2003.00375.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Statistician : journal of the Institute of Statisticians","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1467-9884.2003.00375.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

总结。反馈控制系统是一种过程控制方法,其中以一定的时间间隔测量定量的质量特性,使用连续的措施来估计质量特性与目标的当前平均偏差,必要时,对输入补偿变量进行调整,使估计的过程平均值回到目标。需要解决的重要问题是多久采样一次质量特征,何时以及通过多少进行调整,即确定最佳采样间隔,动作限制和调整量。这样做是为了尽量减少由于每次观察、每次调整和偏离目标的成本的综合影响而产生的长期成本。当调整代价为零时,在每个采样点进行调整(这是一种重复调整方案)。然而,当进行调整的成本很重要时,必须选择两个不同的动作极限,并且只有当质量特性与目标的平均偏差的当前估计值跳出动作极限时才必须进行调整(这是死区方案)。我们考虑三种需要不对称动作限制的情况;它们是确定性过程漂移、非对称脱靶成本和非对称潜在分布。确定性工艺漂移通常是由刀具磨损引起的。不对称成本可能是由于不对称公差和/或超过正公差和负公差的成本不同。不对称分布有时出现在本质上为正的质量特征中。此外,我们考虑到采取适当行动有延迟的可能性;这种延迟通常是由对过程进行采样所需的测试和过程引起的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dead band adjustment charts with asymmetric off‐target costs, deterministic process drift and delayed dynamics
Summary.  Feed-back control systems are a type of process control method in which a quantitative quality characteristic is measured at regular intervals of time, successive measures are used to estimate the current mean deviation of the quality characteristic from the target and, when necessary, adjustments of an input compensatory variable are made to bring the estimated process mean back to the target. Important problems to be solved are how often to sample the quality characteristic and when and by how much to apply an adjustment, i.e. to determine the optimal sampling interval, action limits and amount of adjustment. This determination may be done to minimize the long run cost resulting from the combined effects of the costs of taking each observation, of making each adjustment and of being off target. When the adjustment cost is zero, adjustments are made at each sampling point (this is a repeated adjustment scheme). However, when the cost of making an adjustment is important, two different action limits must be chosen and an adjustment must be made only when the current estimate of the mean deviation of the quality characteristic from target jumps outside the action limits (this is a dead band scheme). We consider three situations requiring asymmetric action limits; these are deterministic process drift, asymmetric off-target costs and asymmetric underlying distributions. Deterministic process drift is often caused by tool wear. Asymmetric costs may be due to asymmetric tolerances and/or to different costs of exceeding positive and negative tolerances. Asymmetric distributions sometimes appear in essentially positive quality characteristics. In addition, we consider the possibility that there is a delay in taking appropriate actions; this delay is often caused by the tests and procedures that are required to sample the process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书