内科论坛:意见与争议。

J. Manitius
{"title":"内科论坛:意见与争议。","authors":"J. Manitius","doi":"10.20452/pamw.3743","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1062 The lack of internists, or rather their relative shortage, is a progressive and, even worse, irre‐ versible phenomenon. This is undoubtedly due to the dynamic development of specializations de‐ riving from traditional internal medicine. The said specializations are attractive not only for finan‐ cial reasons, but also by virtue of the well ‐earned prestige enjoyed by their holders among both fel‐ low professionals and patients. In this context, a specialist in internal medicine is recognized as a physician whose competences, and hence skills, are not clearly specified. Such a specialist is per‐ ceived this way not only by their own profession‐ al community, but also by patients. Nowadays, there is a belief and a consequent expectation among patients that they qualify for specialist treatment every time they suffer from any symptom or ailment. My 40‐year long clini‐ cal experience has given me the impression that the subjective well ‐being of a patient is based on the frequency of their visits to a specialist, and not on objective treatment effects which translate into the broadly taken improvement of life quali‐ ty. I presume that this is associated with substan‐ tial deficiencies in the society’s health education, which is based on the premise that health should be regarded from a holistic and quality ‐oriented perspective. It could therefore be concluded that there is no part to be played by an internal dis‐ eases specialist within medicine as a domain so grossly divided into specialties. However, the mir‐ ror image of this conclusion is the fact that it is in such a highly branched medicine that a stable role should be occupied by an experienced physician, who is able to draw final conclusions based on in‐ formation obtained from individual specialists. Adopting such a solution would entail the re‐ evaluation of the role of an internal medicine spe‐ cialist with respect to 2 central processes: diag‐ nostics and treatment. Thus, within the structure of a hospital, an internist should be the person responsible for planning the diagnostic process. Through referring patients to relevant specialists FORUM FOR INTERNAL MEDICINE","PeriodicalId":20343,"journal":{"name":"Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej","volume":"3 1","pages":"1062-1065"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Forum for internal medicine: opinions and controversies.\",\"authors\":\"J. Manitius\",\"doi\":\"10.20452/pamw.3743\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"1062 The lack of internists, or rather their relative shortage, is a progressive and, even worse, irre‐ versible phenomenon. This is undoubtedly due to the dynamic development of specializations de‐ riving from traditional internal medicine. The said specializations are attractive not only for finan‐ cial reasons, but also by virtue of the well ‐earned prestige enjoyed by their holders among both fel‐ low professionals and patients. In this context, a specialist in internal medicine is recognized as a physician whose competences, and hence skills, are not clearly specified. Such a specialist is per‐ ceived this way not only by their own profession‐ al community, but also by patients. Nowadays, there is a belief and a consequent expectation among patients that they qualify for specialist treatment every time they suffer from any symptom or ailment. My 40‐year long clini‐ cal experience has given me the impression that the subjective well ‐being of a patient is based on the frequency of their visits to a specialist, and not on objective treatment effects which translate into the broadly taken improvement of life quali‐ ty. I presume that this is associated with substan‐ tial deficiencies in the society’s health education, which is based on the premise that health should be regarded from a holistic and quality ‐oriented perspective. It could therefore be concluded that there is no part to be played by an internal dis‐ eases specialist within medicine as a domain so grossly divided into specialties. However, the mir‐ ror image of this conclusion is the fact that it is in such a highly branched medicine that a stable role should be occupied by an experienced physician, who is able to draw final conclusions based on in‐ formation obtained from individual specialists. Adopting such a solution would entail the re‐ evaluation of the role of an internal medicine spe‐ cialist with respect to 2 central processes: diag‐ nostics and treatment. Thus, within the structure of a hospital, an internist should be the person responsible for planning the diagnostic process. Through referring patients to relevant specialists FORUM FOR INTERNAL MEDICINE\",\"PeriodicalId\":20343,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"1062-1065\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.3743\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Polskie Archiwum Medycyny Wewnetrznej","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20452/pamw.3743","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

1062 .内科医生的缺乏,或者更确切地说,内科医生的相对短缺,是一个渐进的,甚至更糟糕的,不可逆转的现象。毫无疑问,这是由于传统内科医学专业的动态发展。上述专业之所以具有吸引力,不仅是因为经济原因,还因为他们的持有者在自我感觉低下的专业人员和患者中享有良好的声誉。在这种情况下,内科专家被认为是其能力和技能没有明确规定的医生。这样的专家不仅被他们自己的专业团体,而且也被患者这样看待。如今,患者中有一种信念和随之而来的期望,即每当他们出现任何症状或疾病时,他们都有资格接受专科治疗。我40年的临床经验给我的印象是,病人的主观幸福感是基于他们去看专家的频率,而不是客观的治疗效果,后者转化为生活质量的广泛改善。我认为这与社会健康教育的实质性缺陷有关,这是基于健康应该从整体和质量为导向的角度来看待的前提。因此,可以得出结论,内科疾病专家在医学领域中没有发挥作用,因为医学领域被划分为多个专业。然而,这一结论的反义词是,在这样一个高度分支的医学中,一个稳定的角色应该由经验丰富的医生担任,他能够根据从个别专家那里获得的信息得出最终结论。采用这样的解决方案需要重新评估内科专家在两个核心过程中的作用:诊断和治疗。因此,在医院的结构中,内科医生应该是负责规划诊断过程的人。通过将患者转介给相关的内科专家论坛
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Forum for internal medicine: opinions and controversies.
1062 The lack of internists, or rather their relative shortage, is a progressive and, even worse, irre‐ versible phenomenon. This is undoubtedly due to the dynamic development of specializations de‐ riving from traditional internal medicine. The said specializations are attractive not only for finan‐ cial reasons, but also by virtue of the well ‐earned prestige enjoyed by their holders among both fel‐ low professionals and patients. In this context, a specialist in internal medicine is recognized as a physician whose competences, and hence skills, are not clearly specified. Such a specialist is per‐ ceived this way not only by their own profession‐ al community, but also by patients. Nowadays, there is a belief and a consequent expectation among patients that they qualify for specialist treatment every time they suffer from any symptom or ailment. My 40‐year long clini‐ cal experience has given me the impression that the subjective well ‐being of a patient is based on the frequency of their visits to a specialist, and not on objective treatment effects which translate into the broadly taken improvement of life quali‐ ty. I presume that this is associated with substan‐ tial deficiencies in the society’s health education, which is based on the premise that health should be regarded from a holistic and quality ‐oriented perspective. It could therefore be concluded that there is no part to be played by an internal dis‐ eases specialist within medicine as a domain so grossly divided into specialties. However, the mir‐ ror image of this conclusion is the fact that it is in such a highly branched medicine that a stable role should be occupied by an experienced physician, who is able to draw final conclusions based on in‐ formation obtained from individual specialists. Adopting such a solution would entail the re‐ evaluation of the role of an internal medicine spe‐ cialist with respect to 2 central processes: diag‐ nostics and treatment. Thus, within the structure of a hospital, an internist should be the person responsible for planning the diagnostic process. Through referring patients to relevant specialists FORUM FOR INTERNAL MEDICINE
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信