克服农业集约化中社会包容的障碍:对印度和孟加拉国跨学科社区发展项目的思考

IF 1.2 3区 社会学 Q3 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
C. H. Roth, M. Cosijn, L. Carter, Arnab Chakraborty, Mahanambrota Das, S. Hamilton, Alak Kumar Jana, L. Lim-Camacho, S. Majumdar, W. Merritt, Pulak Mishra, Rajeshwar Mishra, U. Nidumolu, Md. Wakilur Rahman, Dhananjay Ray, L. Williams
{"title":"克服农业集约化中社会包容的障碍:对印度和孟加拉国跨学科社区发展项目的思考","authors":"C. H. Roth, M. Cosijn, L. Carter, Arnab Chakraborty, Mahanambrota Das, S. Hamilton, Alak Kumar Jana, L. Lim-Camacho, S. Majumdar, W. Merritt, Pulak Mishra, Rajeshwar Mishra, U. Nidumolu, Md. Wakilur Rahman, Dhananjay Ray, L. Williams","doi":"10.1093/cdj/bsad005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n We describe a research-for-development (R4D) strategy developed to address how investments and interventions in agricultural intensification as a means to achieve community development can be designed to be more socially inclusive and equitable. We draw on results from a 5-year project – Promoting socially inclusive and sustainable agricultural intensification in West Bengal (India) and southern Bangladesh (SIAGI). We reflect on a major pivot in the project’s strategy, from being primarily research-driven to placing community concerns and priorities at the centre with a shift towards Ethical Community Engagement (ECE). This became the foundational framework which guided the definition and undertaking of all subsequent activities – including a rethink of methods and concepts to develop tools and frameworks fit for purpose and local context, and inculcating a culture of reflexivity and mutual learning in the project. We show that creating the conditions for true participation, where project beneficiaries and non-government organizations are equal partners alongside researchers and government actors, and for co-learning using the ECE framework, sets the foundations for increased and potentially enduring social inclusion in agricultural intensification.","PeriodicalId":47329,"journal":{"name":"Community Development Journal","volume":"38 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Overcoming barriers to social inclusion in agricultural intensification: reflections on a transdisciplinary community development project from India and Bangladesh\",\"authors\":\"C. H. Roth, M. Cosijn, L. Carter, Arnab Chakraborty, Mahanambrota Das, S. Hamilton, Alak Kumar Jana, L. Lim-Camacho, S. Majumdar, W. Merritt, Pulak Mishra, Rajeshwar Mishra, U. Nidumolu, Md. Wakilur Rahman, Dhananjay Ray, L. Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/cdj/bsad005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n We describe a research-for-development (R4D) strategy developed to address how investments and interventions in agricultural intensification as a means to achieve community development can be designed to be more socially inclusive and equitable. We draw on results from a 5-year project – Promoting socially inclusive and sustainable agricultural intensification in West Bengal (India) and southern Bangladesh (SIAGI). We reflect on a major pivot in the project’s strategy, from being primarily research-driven to placing community concerns and priorities at the centre with a shift towards Ethical Community Engagement (ECE). This became the foundational framework which guided the definition and undertaking of all subsequent activities – including a rethink of methods and concepts to develop tools and frameworks fit for purpose and local context, and inculcating a culture of reflexivity and mutual learning in the project. We show that creating the conditions for true participation, where project beneficiaries and non-government organizations are equal partners alongside researchers and government actors, and for co-learning using the ECE framework, sets the foundations for increased and potentially enduring social inclusion in agricultural intensification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47329,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Community Development Journal\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Community Development Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsad005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Community Development Journal","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsad005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们描述了一项研究促进发展(R4D)战略,该战略旨在解决如何将农业集约化投资和干预措施设计为实现社区发展的手段,使其更具社会包容性和公平性。我们借鉴了一个5年项目的成果——促进西孟加拉邦(印度)和孟加拉国南部(SIAGI)的社会包容性和可持续农业集约化。我们反思了项目战略的一个主要支点,从主要的研究驱动到将社区关注和优先事项放在中心,转向道德社区参与(ECE)。这成为指导所有后续活动的定义和开展的基础框架-包括重新思考方法和概念,以开发适合目的和当地环境的工具和框架,并在项目中灌输反思和相互学习的文化。我们表明,为项目受益人和非政府组织与研究人员和政府行为者成为平等的合作伙伴,以及利用欧洲经委会框架共同学习创造真正参与的条件,为农业集约化中增加和潜在持久的社会包容奠定了基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Overcoming barriers to social inclusion in agricultural intensification: reflections on a transdisciplinary community development project from India and Bangladesh
We describe a research-for-development (R4D) strategy developed to address how investments and interventions in agricultural intensification as a means to achieve community development can be designed to be more socially inclusive and equitable. We draw on results from a 5-year project – Promoting socially inclusive and sustainable agricultural intensification in West Bengal (India) and southern Bangladesh (SIAGI). We reflect on a major pivot in the project’s strategy, from being primarily research-driven to placing community concerns and priorities at the centre with a shift towards Ethical Community Engagement (ECE). This became the foundational framework which guided the definition and undertaking of all subsequent activities – including a rethink of methods and concepts to develop tools and frameworks fit for purpose and local context, and inculcating a culture of reflexivity and mutual learning in the project. We show that creating the conditions for true participation, where project beneficiaries and non-government organizations are equal partners alongside researchers and government actors, and for co-learning using the ECE framework, sets the foundations for increased and potentially enduring social inclusion in agricultural intensification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Community Development Journal
Community Development Journal DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
38
期刊介绍: Since 1966 the leading international journal in its field, covering a wide range of topics, reviewing significant developments and providing a forum for cutting-edge debates about theory and practice. It adopts a broad definition of community development to include policy, planning and action as they impact on the life of communities. We particularly seek to publish critically focused articles which challenge received wisdom, report and discuss innovative practices, and relate issues of community development to questions of social justice, diversity and environmental sustainability.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信