非自适应转门流算法的时间下界

Kasper Green Larsen, Jelani Nelson, Huy L. Nguyen
{"title":"非自适应转门流算法的时间下界","authors":"Kasper Green Larsen, Jelani Nelson, Huy L. Nguyen","doi":"10.1145/2746539.2746542","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We say a turnstile streaming algorithm is {\\em non-adaptive} if, during updates, the memory cells written and read depend only on the index being updated and random coins tossed at the beginning of the stream (and not on the memory contents of the algorithm). Memory cells read during queries may be decided upon adaptively. All known turnstile streaming algorithms in the literature, except a single recent example for a particular promise problem [7], are non-adaptive. In fact, even more specifically, they are all linear sketches. We prove the first non-trivial update time lower bounds for both randomized and deterministic turnstile streaming algorithms, which hold when the algorithms are non-adaptive. While there has been abundant success in proving space lower bounds, there have been no non-trivial turnstile update time lower bounds. Our lower bounds hold against classically studied problems such as heavy hitters, point query, entropy estimation, and moment estimation. In some cases of deterministic algorithms, our lower bounds nearly match known upper bounds.","PeriodicalId":20566,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the forty-seventh annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing","volume":"40 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"16","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Time Lower Bounds for Nonadaptive Turnstile Streaming Algorithms\",\"authors\":\"Kasper Green Larsen, Jelani Nelson, Huy L. Nguyen\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2746539.2746542\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We say a turnstile streaming algorithm is {\\\\em non-adaptive} if, during updates, the memory cells written and read depend only on the index being updated and random coins tossed at the beginning of the stream (and not on the memory contents of the algorithm). Memory cells read during queries may be decided upon adaptively. All known turnstile streaming algorithms in the literature, except a single recent example for a particular promise problem [7], are non-adaptive. In fact, even more specifically, they are all linear sketches. We prove the first non-trivial update time lower bounds for both randomized and deterministic turnstile streaming algorithms, which hold when the algorithms are non-adaptive. While there has been abundant success in proving space lower bounds, there have been no non-trivial turnstile update time lower bounds. Our lower bounds hold against classically studied problems such as heavy hitters, point query, entropy estimation, and moment estimation. In some cases of deterministic algorithms, our lower bounds nearly match known upper bounds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20566,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the forty-seventh annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"16\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the forty-seventh annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2746539.2746542\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the forty-seventh annual ACM symposium on Theory of Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2746539.2746542","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

摘要

我们说一个turnstile流算法是{\em非自适应}的,如果在更新期间,内存单元的写入和读取只依赖于被更新的索引和在流开始时随机抛出的硬币(而不是算法的内存内容)。在查询期间读取的存储单元可以自适应地决定。除了最近的一个特定承诺问题的例子[7]外,文献中所有已知的转门流算法都是非自适应的。事实上,更具体地说,它们都是线性草图。我们证明了随机化和确定性旋转门流算法的第一个非平凡更新时间下界,当算法是非自适应时,该下界成立。虽然在证明空间下界方面已经取得了很大的成功,但没有非平凡的旋转门更新时间下界。我们的下限适用于经典研究的问题,如重拳、点查询、熵估计和矩估计。在某些确定性算法的情况下,我们的下界几乎匹配已知的上界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Time Lower Bounds for Nonadaptive Turnstile Streaming Algorithms
We say a turnstile streaming algorithm is {\em non-adaptive} if, during updates, the memory cells written and read depend only on the index being updated and random coins tossed at the beginning of the stream (and not on the memory contents of the algorithm). Memory cells read during queries may be decided upon adaptively. All known turnstile streaming algorithms in the literature, except a single recent example for a particular promise problem [7], are non-adaptive. In fact, even more specifically, they are all linear sketches. We prove the first non-trivial update time lower bounds for both randomized and deterministic turnstile streaming algorithms, which hold when the algorithms are non-adaptive. While there has been abundant success in proving space lower bounds, there have been no non-trivial turnstile update time lower bounds. Our lower bounds hold against classically studied problems such as heavy hitters, point query, entropy estimation, and moment estimation. In some cases of deterministic algorithms, our lower bounds nearly match known upper bounds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信