中国在深海海底采矿方面的进展及其对印度的安全影响

N. Agarwala
{"title":"中国在深海海底采矿方面的进展及其对印度的安全影响","authors":"N. Agarwala","doi":"10.1080/18366503.2021.1871810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Both India and China are ‘Pioneer investor’ nations for Deep Seabed Mining (DSM). Both these nations commenced their exploration quest of the deep seabed at nearly the same time and today are one of the few nations persisting with DSM. These notwithstanding, the developments made by China in this comparative period are many magnitudes more than that made by India. While India has limited its research to the Indian Ocean Region (IOR), China has gone global to win five exploration contracts from the International Seabed Authority (ISA). China is also rated as the first country that would commence exploitation once the exploitation rules are promulgated by the ISA. In going global, China has the exploration rights in the Indian Ocean for polymetallic sulphides with efforts to acquire some more Area in this oceanic space. While China grows technologically in the field of DSM and deploys its assets in the IOR, it is adding to the already skewed threat perception thereby becoming a matter of security concern for India. It is with this understanding that the article aims to look at the developments made and the involvement of China in the IOR for DSM and their resultant security implications for India.","PeriodicalId":37179,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs","volume":"13 1","pages":"94 - 112"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advances by China in deep Seabed mining and its security implications for India\",\"authors\":\"N. Agarwala\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/18366503.2021.1871810\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Both India and China are ‘Pioneer investor’ nations for Deep Seabed Mining (DSM). Both these nations commenced their exploration quest of the deep seabed at nearly the same time and today are one of the few nations persisting with DSM. These notwithstanding, the developments made by China in this comparative period are many magnitudes more than that made by India. While India has limited its research to the Indian Ocean Region (IOR), China has gone global to win five exploration contracts from the International Seabed Authority (ISA). China is also rated as the first country that would commence exploitation once the exploitation rules are promulgated by the ISA. In going global, China has the exploration rights in the Indian Ocean for polymetallic sulphides with efforts to acquire some more Area in this oceanic space. While China grows technologically in the field of DSM and deploys its assets in the IOR, it is adding to the already skewed threat perception thereby becoming a matter of security concern for India. It is with this understanding that the article aims to look at the developments made and the involvement of China in the IOR for DSM and their resultant security implications for India.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"94 - 112\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2021.1871810\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18366503.2021.1871810","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

印度和中国都是深海底采矿(DSM)的“投资先锋”国家。这两个国家几乎在同一时间开始了他们对深海海底的探索,今天是少数几个坚持DSM的国家之一。尽管如此,中国在这一比较时期取得的发展比印度取得的发展要大得多。印度将其研究局限在印度洋地区(IOR),而中国已经走向全球,从国际海底管理局(ISA)赢得了五份勘探合同。中国也被评为一旦国际海底管理局颁布开采规则,将率先开始开采的国家。在“走出去”的过程中,中国在印度洋拥有多金属硫化物的勘探权,并努力在该海域获得更多的面积。虽然中国在DSM领域的技术发展,并在印度洋部署其资产,但它正在增加已经扭曲的威胁认知,从而成为印度的安全担忧问题。正是基于这种理解,本文的目的是研究中国在DSM的IOR中的发展和参与,以及它们对印度的安全影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advances by China in deep Seabed mining and its security implications for India
ABSTRACT Both India and China are ‘Pioneer investor’ nations for Deep Seabed Mining (DSM). Both these nations commenced their exploration quest of the deep seabed at nearly the same time and today are one of the few nations persisting with DSM. These notwithstanding, the developments made by China in this comparative period are many magnitudes more than that made by India. While India has limited its research to the Indian Ocean Region (IOR), China has gone global to win five exploration contracts from the International Seabed Authority (ISA). China is also rated as the first country that would commence exploitation once the exploitation rules are promulgated by the ISA. In going global, China has the exploration rights in the Indian Ocean for polymetallic sulphides with efforts to acquire some more Area in this oceanic space. While China grows technologically in the field of DSM and deploys its assets in the IOR, it is adding to the already skewed threat perception thereby becoming a matter of security concern for India. It is with this understanding that the article aims to look at the developments made and the involvement of China in the IOR for DSM and their resultant security implications for India.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs
Australian Journal of Maritime and Ocean Affairs Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信