COVID-19疫苗接种政策:切实落实公民生命权

Q1 Social Sciences
Fahmi Fairuzzaman, Deva Angger Rakasiwi, Galih Aprillia Wibowo, Imaniar Rinanda Ayuningtyas
{"title":"COVID-19疫苗接种政策:切实落实公民生命权","authors":"Fahmi Fairuzzaman, Deva Angger Rakasiwi, Galih Aprillia Wibowo, Imaniar Rinanda Ayuningtyas","doi":"10.23917/laj.v6i2.15269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aimed to analyze the factors that influence the pros and cons of the community regarding the COVID-19 vaccine policy and discuss the formulation of the Indonesian Government's policy regarding the distribution of an effective vaccine to realize the right to life amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, the methodology of this research is normative, in the hope that the research approach was carried out for researchers to obtain information from various aspects in order to find the issues to be addressed. Normative research uses legal materials obtained through scientific literature or the law. The results of the conclusion show that the factors influencing the pros and cons of the community regarding the fulfillment of the right to life through vaccine policies consisted of multicultural settings that affected the mindset and perspective of the community in perceiving the COVID-19 virus outbreak so that there were differences of opinion regarding government policies that echoed mass vaccines to aggravate the number of the positive cases. Besides, the government's consistency factor in the form of Law which reads: (1) Every person has the right to live, to sustain life, and to improve his/her standard of living. (2) Every person has the right to tranquility, safety, peace, happiness, physical and mental prosperity. (3) Every person has the right to an adequate and healthy environment. supervise COVID-19 vaccinations.","PeriodicalId":38241,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COVID-19 Vaccination Policy: Quo Vadis Fulfillment of Citizen’s Right to Life\",\"authors\":\"Fahmi Fairuzzaman, Deva Angger Rakasiwi, Galih Aprillia Wibowo, Imaniar Rinanda Ayuningtyas\",\"doi\":\"10.23917/laj.v6i2.15269\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article aimed to analyze the factors that influence the pros and cons of the community regarding the COVID-19 vaccine policy and discuss the formulation of the Indonesian Government's policy regarding the distribution of an effective vaccine to realize the right to life amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, the methodology of this research is normative, in the hope that the research approach was carried out for researchers to obtain information from various aspects in order to find the issues to be addressed. Normative research uses legal materials obtained through scientific literature or the law. The results of the conclusion show that the factors influencing the pros and cons of the community regarding the fulfillment of the right to life through vaccine policies consisted of multicultural settings that affected the mindset and perspective of the community in perceiving the COVID-19 virus outbreak so that there were differences of opinion regarding government policies that echoed mass vaccines to aggravate the number of the positive cases. Besides, the government's consistency factor in the form of Law which reads: (1) Every person has the right to live, to sustain life, and to improve his/her standard of living. (2) Every person has the right to tranquility, safety, peace, happiness, physical and mental prosperity. (3) Every person has the right to an adequate and healthy environment. supervise COVID-19 vaccinations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v6i2.15269\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Readings in Law and Social Justice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23917/laj.v6i2.15269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文旨在分析影响社区对COVID-19疫苗政策的利弊因素,并讨论印度尼西亚政府制定有效疫苗分发政策,以实现COVID-19大流行期间的生命权。此外,本研究的方法是规范的,希望研究方法的实施能让研究人员从各个方面获取信息,从而找到需要解决的问题。规范研究使用通过科学文献或法律获得的法律材料。结果表明,影响社区通过疫苗政策实现生命权的利弊因素包括多元文化环境,影响了社区对COVID-19疫情的认知心态和视角,导致对政府政策的意见分歧,这些政策呼应了大规模疫苗以加剧阳性病例的数量。此外,政府的一致性因素体现在法律的形式上,法律规定:(1)每个人都有生存、维持生命和提高生活水平的权利。(二)人人享有安宁、安全、和平、幸福、身心健康的权利。(3)人人有权享有适当和健康的环境。监督COVID-19疫苗接种。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
COVID-19 Vaccination Policy: Quo Vadis Fulfillment of Citizen’s Right to Life
This article aimed to analyze the factors that influence the pros and cons of the community regarding the COVID-19 vaccine policy and discuss the formulation of the Indonesian Government's policy regarding the distribution of an effective vaccine to realize the right to life amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, the methodology of this research is normative, in the hope that the research approach was carried out for researchers to obtain information from various aspects in order to find the issues to be addressed. Normative research uses legal materials obtained through scientific literature or the law. The results of the conclusion show that the factors influencing the pros and cons of the community regarding the fulfillment of the right to life through vaccine policies consisted of multicultural settings that affected the mindset and perspective of the community in perceiving the COVID-19 virus outbreak so that there were differences of opinion regarding government policies that echoed mass vaccines to aggravate the number of the positive cases. Besides, the government's consistency factor in the form of Law which reads: (1) Every person has the right to live, to sustain life, and to improve his/her standard of living. (2) Every person has the right to tranquility, safety, peace, happiness, physical and mental prosperity. (3) Every person has the right to an adequate and healthy environment. supervise COVID-19 vaccinations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信