基于风险的检查评估与筛选中的人工智能研究——以ILI检查为例

IF 1.8 Q2 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Taufik Aditiyawarman, J. Soedarsono, A. Kaban, R. Riastuti, Haryo Rahmadani
{"title":"基于风险的检查评估与筛选中的人工智能研究——以ILI检查为例","authors":"Taufik Aditiyawarman, J. Soedarsono, A. Kaban, R. Riastuti, Haryo Rahmadani","doi":"10.1115/1.4054969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The work reports the systematic approach to the study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in addressing the complexity of ILI data management to forecast the risk in natural gas pipelines. A recent conventional standard may not be sufficient to address the variation data of corrosion defects and inherent human subjectivity. Such methodology undermines the accuracy assessment confidence and is ineffective in reducing inspection costs. In this work, a combination of Unsupervised and Supervised Machine Learning and Deep Learning has profoundly accelerated the Probability of Failure (PoF) assessment and analysis. K-Means Clustering and Gaussian Mixture Models show direct relevance between the corrosion depth and corrosion rate, while the overlapping PoF value is scattered in three clusters. Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, k-Nearest Neighbors, and ensemble classifiers of AdaBoost, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting are constructed using particular features, labels, and hyperparameters. The algorithm correctly predicted the score of PoF from 4790 instances and confirmed the 25% metal loss at a location of 13.399 m. The Artificial Neural Network is designed with various layers (input, hidden, and output) architecture. It is optimized using an activation function to predict that 74% of the pipeline's anomalies that classified at low-medium and medium-high risk. Furthermore, it provides a quick and precise prediction about the external defects at 13.1 m and requires the personnel to conduct wrapping composite. This work can be used as a standard guideline for risk assessment based on ILI and applies to industry and academia.","PeriodicalId":44694,"journal":{"name":"ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part B-Mechanical Engineering","volume":"320 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Study of Artificial Intelligent in Risk-Based Inspection Assessment and Screening: A Study Case of ILI Inspection\",\"authors\":\"Taufik Aditiyawarman, J. Soedarsono, A. Kaban, R. Riastuti, Haryo Rahmadani\",\"doi\":\"10.1115/1.4054969\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The work reports the systematic approach to the study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in addressing the complexity of ILI data management to forecast the risk in natural gas pipelines. A recent conventional standard may not be sufficient to address the variation data of corrosion defects and inherent human subjectivity. Such methodology undermines the accuracy assessment confidence and is ineffective in reducing inspection costs. In this work, a combination of Unsupervised and Supervised Machine Learning and Deep Learning has profoundly accelerated the Probability of Failure (PoF) assessment and analysis. K-Means Clustering and Gaussian Mixture Models show direct relevance between the corrosion depth and corrosion rate, while the overlapping PoF value is scattered in three clusters. Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, k-Nearest Neighbors, and ensemble classifiers of AdaBoost, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting are constructed using particular features, labels, and hyperparameters. The algorithm correctly predicted the score of PoF from 4790 instances and confirmed the 25% metal loss at a location of 13.399 m. The Artificial Neural Network is designed with various layers (input, hidden, and output) architecture. It is optimized using an activation function to predict that 74% of the pipeline's anomalies that classified at low-medium and medium-high risk. Furthermore, it provides a quick and precise prediction about the external defects at 13.1 m and requires the personnel to conduct wrapping composite. This work can be used as a standard guideline for risk assessment based on ILI and applies to industry and academia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44694,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part B-Mechanical Engineering\",\"volume\":\"320 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part B-Mechanical Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4054969\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ASCE-ASME Journal of Risk and Uncertainty in Engineering Systems Part B-Mechanical Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4054969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

该工作报告了人工智能(AI)研究的系统方法,以解决ILI数据管理的复杂性,以预测天然气管道风险。最近的常规标准可能不足以解决腐蚀缺陷的变化数据和固有的人的主观性。这种方法破坏了准确性评估的信心,在降低检查成本方面是无效的。在这项工作中,无监督和有监督机器学习与深度学习的结合极大地加速了故障概率(PoF)的评估和分析。K-Means聚类模型和高斯混合模型显示腐蚀深度与腐蚀速率直接相关,而重叠的PoF值分散在三个聚类中。使用特定的特征、标签和超参数构造逻辑回归、支持向量机、k近邻和AdaBoost、随机森林和梯度增强的集成分类器。该算法从4790个实例中正确预测了PoF的分数,并在13.399 m的位置确认了25%的金属损失。人工神经网络采用多层(输入、隐藏和输出)架构设计。利用激活函数对74%的管道异常进行了优化,这些异常被划分为中低风险和中高风险。此外,它可以快速准确地预测13.1 m处的外部缺陷,并要求人员进行包覆复合。该工作可作为基于ILI的风险评估的标准指南,并适用于工业界和学术界。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Study of Artificial Intelligent in Risk-Based Inspection Assessment and Screening: A Study Case of ILI Inspection
The work reports the systematic approach to the study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in addressing the complexity of ILI data management to forecast the risk in natural gas pipelines. A recent conventional standard may not be sufficient to address the variation data of corrosion defects and inherent human subjectivity. Such methodology undermines the accuracy assessment confidence and is ineffective in reducing inspection costs. In this work, a combination of Unsupervised and Supervised Machine Learning and Deep Learning has profoundly accelerated the Probability of Failure (PoF) assessment and analysis. K-Means Clustering and Gaussian Mixture Models show direct relevance between the corrosion depth and corrosion rate, while the overlapping PoF value is scattered in three clusters. Logistic Regression, Support Vector Machine, k-Nearest Neighbors, and ensemble classifiers of AdaBoost, Random Forest, and Gradient Boosting are constructed using particular features, labels, and hyperparameters. The algorithm correctly predicted the score of PoF from 4790 instances and confirmed the 25% metal loss at a location of 13.399 m. The Artificial Neural Network is designed with various layers (input, hidden, and output) architecture. It is optimized using an activation function to predict that 74% of the pipeline's anomalies that classified at low-medium and medium-high risk. Furthermore, it provides a quick and precise prediction about the external defects at 13.1 m and requires the personnel to conduct wrapping composite. This work can be used as a standard guideline for risk assessment based on ILI and applies to industry and academia.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
13.60%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信