独占版权的理想分享:乌托邦还是现实?

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW

Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review Pub Date : 2021-12-20 DOI:10.24031/1992-2043-2021-21-5-166-192

N. V. Shcherbak

{"title":"独占版权的理想分享:乌托邦还是现实?","authors":"N. V. Shcherbak","doi":"10.24031/1992-2043-2021-21-5-166-192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article discusses the problem of allocating ideal shares in exclusive copyright. The legal and dogmatic design of exclusive rights allows you to establish not only a joint, but also share right and this is fully consistent with the stimulating function of exclusive rights. The paper analyzes various theoretical models of exclusive right, and concludes that the lack of ideal shares in exclusive right becomes a stumbling block for commercializing the results of intellectual activity and leads to paralysis of civil turnover.","PeriodicalId":35992,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review","volume":"210 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"IDEAL SHARE IN EXCLUSIVE COPYRIGHT: UTOPIA OR REALITY?\",\"authors\":\"N. V. Shcherbak\",\"doi\":\"10.24031/1992-2043-2021-21-5-166-192\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article discusses the problem of allocating ideal shares in exclusive copyright. The legal and dogmatic design of exclusive rights allows you to establish not only a joint, but also share right and this is fully consistent with the stimulating function of exclusive rights. The paper analyzes various theoretical models of exclusive right, and concludes that the lack of ideal shares in exclusive right becomes a stumbling block for commercializing the results of intellectual activity and leads to paralysis of civil turnover.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review\",\"volume\":\"210 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24031/1992-2043-2021-21-5-166-192\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24031/1992-2043-2021-21-5-166-192","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论了著作权的理想份额分配问题。专有权的法制化、教条化设计使你既可以建立共同权利，又可以建立共享权利，这与专有权的激励功能是完全一致的。本文分析了专属权的各种理论模型，认为专属权理想份额的缺失成为智力活动成果商品化的绊脚石，导致民事流动的瘫痪。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

IDEAL SHARE IN EXCLUSIVE COPYRIGHT: UTOPIA OR REALITY?

The article discusses the problem of allocating ideal shares in exclusive copyright. The legal and dogmatic design of exclusive rights allows you to establish not only a joint, but also share right and this is fully consistent with the stimulating function of exclusive rights. The paper analyzes various theoretical models of exclusive right, and concludes that the lack of ideal shares in exclusive right becomes a stumbling block for commercializing the results of intellectual activity and leads to paralysis of civil turnover.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review (CR-CL) is the nation’s leading progressive law journal. Founded in 1966 as an instrument to advance personal freedoms and human dignities, CR-CL seeks to catalyze progressive thought and dialogue through publishing innovative legal scholarship and from various perspectives and in diverse fields of study.