医学环境中前瞻性风险分析的概念本体- opt模型本体

Timo Sigwarth, K. Loewe, Eberhard Beck, Lutz Pelchen, T. Schrader
{"title":"医学环境中前瞻性风险分析的概念本体- opt模型本体","authors":"Timo Sigwarth, K. Loewe, Eberhard Beck, Lutz Pelchen, T. Schrader","doi":"10.1109/INTELCIS.2015.7397202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Clinical processes tend to be highly complex which results in 5%-10% erroneous procedures. A process risk analysis through the medical risk management is mostly retrospectively, therefore it's commonly not suited to prevent errors before occurring. In technical domains prospective analysis methods, like Hazards & Operability study (HAZOP study), are widely used, but the adaption of these methods for medical processes is rather difficult.","PeriodicalId":6478,"journal":{"name":"2015 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Information Systems (ICICIS)","volume":"23 1","pages":"88-93"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conceptual ontology of prospective risk analysis in medical environments - the OPT-Model-Ontology\",\"authors\":\"Timo Sigwarth, K. Loewe, Eberhard Beck, Lutz Pelchen, T. Schrader\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/INTELCIS.2015.7397202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Clinical processes tend to be highly complex which results in 5%-10% erroneous procedures. A process risk analysis through the medical risk management is mostly retrospectively, therefore it's commonly not suited to prevent errors before occurring. In technical domains prospective analysis methods, like Hazards & Operability study (HAZOP study), are widely used, but the adaption of these methods for medical processes is rather difficult.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2015 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Information Systems (ICICIS)\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"88-93\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2015 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Information Systems (ICICIS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/INTELCIS.2015.7397202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2015 IEEE Seventh International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Information Systems (ICICIS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/INTELCIS.2015.7397202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

临床过程往往非常复杂,导致5%-10%的错误操作。通过医疗风险管理进行的过程风险分析大多是回顾性的,因此通常不适合在错误发生之前进行预防。在技术领域,前瞻性分析方法,如危害与可操作性研究(HAZOP研究)被广泛使用,但这些方法在医疗过程中的适应是相当困难的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conceptual ontology of prospective risk analysis in medical environments - the OPT-Model-Ontology
Clinical processes tend to be highly complex which results in 5%-10% erroneous procedures. A process risk analysis through the medical risk management is mostly retrospectively, therefore it's commonly not suited to prevent errors before occurring. In technical domains prospective analysis methods, like Hazards & Operability study (HAZOP study), are widely used, but the adaption of these methods for medical processes is rather difficult.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信