胸部CT非对比扫描在肺血栓栓塞诊断中的应用

L. Shaaban, M. Othman, H. Abozaid, N. D. Mohamed
{"title":"胸部CT非对比扫描在肺血栓栓塞诊断中的应用","authors":"L. Shaaban, M. Othman, H. Abozaid, N. D. Mohamed","doi":"10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA3117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most common acute cardiovascular disease after myocardial infarction and stroke and results in thousands of deaths each year because it often goes undetected. This study, aime to evaluate the role of non–contrast MSCT in detection of pulmonary embolism. Methods: One hundered patients requested for CT pulmonary angiography (pulmonary CTA) clinically evaluated according to revised Geneva scoring system undergone non-contrast and contrast-enhanced CT images of the chest and were reviewed separately. The average CT attenuation differences between the high attenuation clots and pulmonary arteries were computed. Findings in the non-contrast images were correlated with the contrast-enhanced images. Results: Twenty-six of 100 patients were positive for PE in CTAs. Mean age (± SD) was 56.73 (± 9.11) years, 17 (65.4%) were females, Geneva scoring revealed low, intermediate, high propablity(2%, 7%, and 17%) respectively. Of these 26 patients, 13 were positive for the hyperdense lumen sign in the non-contrast CT images with high, intermediate and low revised Geneva score 10(76%), 3 (23%), 0 (0%) respectively. The hyperdense lumen sign has an over-all sensitivity of 50 %, specificity of 98.6%. The other 13 patients; ten of them had more than one indirect sign. The most common indirect sign revealed high specificity 91% and statistical significant is the peripheral wedged shaped opacities. Conclusion: Non-contrast chest CT scans have good role in evaluation of PE through detection the hyperdense lumen sign that is a good indicator of acute pulmonary thromboembolism particularly in cases involving the central pulmonary arteries or peripheral wedge shaped opacity as useful indirect sign.","PeriodicalId":20797,"journal":{"name":"Pulmonary embolism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Non-Contrast Chest CT Scans In Detection Of Pulmonary Thromboembolism\",\"authors\":\"L. Shaaban, M. Othman, H. Abozaid, N. D. Mohamed\",\"doi\":\"10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA3117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background:Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most common acute cardiovascular disease after myocardial infarction and stroke and results in thousands of deaths each year because it often goes undetected. This study, aime to evaluate the role of non–contrast MSCT in detection of pulmonary embolism. Methods: One hundered patients requested for CT pulmonary angiography (pulmonary CTA) clinically evaluated according to revised Geneva scoring system undergone non-contrast and contrast-enhanced CT images of the chest and were reviewed separately. The average CT attenuation differences between the high attenuation clots and pulmonary arteries were computed. Findings in the non-contrast images were correlated with the contrast-enhanced images. Results: Twenty-six of 100 patients were positive for PE in CTAs. Mean age (± SD) was 56.73 (± 9.11) years, 17 (65.4%) were females, Geneva scoring revealed low, intermediate, high propablity(2%, 7%, and 17%) respectively. Of these 26 patients, 13 were positive for the hyperdense lumen sign in the non-contrast CT images with high, intermediate and low revised Geneva score 10(76%), 3 (23%), 0 (0%) respectively. The hyperdense lumen sign has an over-all sensitivity of 50 %, specificity of 98.6%. The other 13 patients; ten of them had more than one indirect sign. The most common indirect sign revealed high specificity 91% and statistical significant is the peripheral wedged shaped opacities. Conclusion: Non-contrast chest CT scans have good role in evaluation of PE through detection the hyperdense lumen sign that is a good indicator of acute pulmonary thromboembolism particularly in cases involving the central pulmonary arteries or peripheral wedge shaped opacity as useful indirect sign.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20797,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pulmonary embolism\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pulmonary embolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA3117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pulmonary embolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1183/13993003.CONGRESS-2018.PA3117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

背景:肺栓塞(PE)是仅次于心肌梗死和中风的第三大常见急性心血管疾病,每年导致数千人死亡,因为它经常未被发现。本研究旨在评价非对比MSCT在肺栓塞检测中的作用。方法:对100例临床要求行CT肺血管造影(pulmonary angiography, CTA)的患者,按照修订后的Geneva评分系统进行评分,分别行胸部CT非对比和增强扫描,并进行回顾性分析。计算高衰减血块与肺动脉的平均CT衰减差值。非对比图像的结果与增强图像的结果相关。结果:100例患者中有26例cta PE阳性。平均年龄(±SD)为56.73(±9.11)岁,女性17例(65.4%),Geneva评分分别为低、中、高概率(2%、7%、17%)。26例患者中,13例在CT非对比影像上呈高密度管腔征象阳性,修正日内瓦评分高、中、低分别为10分(76%)、3分(23%)、0分(0%)。腔内高密度征的总体敏感性为50%,特异性为98.6%。其余13例;其中十个人有一个以上的间接标志。最常见的间接征象是周围楔形混浊,特异性高达91%,具有统计学意义。结论:胸部CT非对比扫描通过检测高密度管腔征象对PE的评估有很好的作用,高密度管腔征象是急性肺血栓栓塞的一个很好的指标,特别是在累及肺动脉中央或周围楔形混浊的情况下,作为一个有用的间接征象。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Non-Contrast Chest CT Scans In Detection Of Pulmonary Thromboembolism
Background:Pulmonary embolism (PE) is the third most common acute cardiovascular disease after myocardial infarction and stroke and results in thousands of deaths each year because it often goes undetected. This study, aime to evaluate the role of non–contrast MSCT in detection of pulmonary embolism. Methods: One hundered patients requested for CT pulmonary angiography (pulmonary CTA) clinically evaluated according to revised Geneva scoring system undergone non-contrast and contrast-enhanced CT images of the chest and were reviewed separately. The average CT attenuation differences between the high attenuation clots and pulmonary arteries were computed. Findings in the non-contrast images were correlated with the contrast-enhanced images. Results: Twenty-six of 100 patients were positive for PE in CTAs. Mean age (± SD) was 56.73 (± 9.11) years, 17 (65.4%) were females, Geneva scoring revealed low, intermediate, high propablity(2%, 7%, and 17%) respectively. Of these 26 patients, 13 were positive for the hyperdense lumen sign in the non-contrast CT images with high, intermediate and low revised Geneva score 10(76%), 3 (23%), 0 (0%) respectively. The hyperdense lumen sign has an over-all sensitivity of 50 %, specificity of 98.6%. The other 13 patients; ten of them had more than one indirect sign. The most common indirect sign revealed high specificity 91% and statistical significant is the peripheral wedged shaped opacities. Conclusion: Non-contrast chest CT scans have good role in evaluation of PE through detection the hyperdense lumen sign that is a good indicator of acute pulmonary thromboembolism particularly in cases involving the central pulmonary arteries or peripheral wedge shaped opacity as useful indirect sign.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信