面向通用技能科学的酸碱溶液化学测试仪器的效度和信度

M. Riza, Kartono Kartono, E. Susilaningsih
{"title":"面向通用技能科学的酸碱溶液化学测试仪器的效度和信度","authors":"M. Riza, Kartono Kartono, E. Susilaningsih","doi":"10.15294/jere.v11i1.55450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The 2013 curriculum prioritizes the generic skills needed in science learning. Generic science skills require valid and reliable measuring tools. The purpose of this research is to reveal validity and reliability Chemical test instruments oriented to generic science skills on acid and base solutions. The subjects used were 35 students for the small class test and 125 students for the large class test. The method used is the quantitative method in the form of questionnaire sheets and KGS-oriented acid-base chemistry questions. Construct validity using confirmatory first order analysis. Interterrater reliability using 3 raters and tested using two-way annova with Ebel formula. The reliability of the large class test used the cronbach alpha formula. content validity of each item in each 81.25% eligible category. Construct validity seen from the item polarity of the items has a positive Point Measure Correlation (Pt. Mea-Corr). A total of 32 items have a strong or high correlation number. Three questions, namely item number 23 (0.57), 27 (0.49), and 33 (0.67) have a moderate correlation. Reliability between expert raters was analyzed using the Ebel formula resulting in 0.79 which was in the currently category. Small class test reliability 0.97 high category. The reliability of the large class test item reliability is 0.90, personal reliability is 0.94, and the KR-20 is 0.99 which is classified as high. Thus, the level of generic science ability that has been tested for validity and Reliability can be used by educators to determine the level of students' generic science abilities.","PeriodicalId":30816,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Validity and Reliability of Chemical Test Instruments for Acid and Base Solutions Oriented Generic Skills Science\",\"authors\":\"M. Riza, Kartono Kartono, E. Susilaningsih\",\"doi\":\"10.15294/jere.v11i1.55450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The 2013 curriculum prioritizes the generic skills needed in science learning. Generic science skills require valid and reliable measuring tools. The purpose of this research is to reveal validity and reliability Chemical test instruments oriented to generic science skills on acid and base solutions. The subjects used were 35 students for the small class test and 125 students for the large class test. The method used is the quantitative method in the form of questionnaire sheets and KGS-oriented acid-base chemistry questions. Construct validity using confirmatory first order analysis. Interterrater reliability using 3 raters and tested using two-way annova with Ebel formula. The reliability of the large class test used the cronbach alpha formula. content validity of each item in each 81.25% eligible category. Construct validity seen from the item polarity of the items has a positive Point Measure Correlation (Pt. Mea-Corr). A total of 32 items have a strong or high correlation number. Three questions, namely item number 23 (0.57), 27 (0.49), and 33 (0.67) have a moderate correlation. Reliability between expert raters was analyzed using the Ebel formula resulting in 0.79 which was in the currently category. Small class test reliability 0.97 high category. The reliability of the large class test item reliability is 0.90, personal reliability is 0.94, and the KR-20 is 0.99 which is classified as high. Thus, the level of generic science ability that has been tested for validity and Reliability can be used by educators to determine the level of students' generic science abilities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15294/jere.v11i1.55450\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Research and Educational Research Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15294/jere.v11i1.55450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2013年的课程将科学学习所需的通用技能放在首位。一般的科学技能需要有效和可靠的测量工具。本研究的目的是揭示针对酸和碱溶液的通用科学技能的化学测试仪器的效度和信度。实验对象为35名小班学生和125名大班学生。使用的方法是定量方法,以问卷和kgs为导向的酸碱化学问题的形式。运用验证性一阶分析建构效度。使用3个评级器,并使用Ebel公式进行双向方差分析。大班检验的信度采用cronbach alpha公式。每个81.25%合格类别中每个项目的内容效度。从项目极性来看,构念效度具有正的点测相关(Pt. mean - corr)。共有32个项目具有强或高相关数。23题(0.57)、27题(0.49)、33题(0.67)具有中等相关性。使用Ebel公式分析专家评分者之间的可靠性,结果为0.79,处于当前类别。小班测试信度0.97高类。大类测试项目信度为0.90,个人信度为0.94,KR-20为0.99,属于高信度。因此,教育工作者可以使用经过效度和信度测试的一般科学能力水平来确定学生的一般科学能力水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Validity and Reliability of Chemical Test Instruments for Acid and Base Solutions Oriented Generic Skills Science
The 2013 curriculum prioritizes the generic skills needed in science learning. Generic science skills require valid and reliable measuring tools. The purpose of this research is to reveal validity and reliability Chemical test instruments oriented to generic science skills on acid and base solutions. The subjects used were 35 students for the small class test and 125 students for the large class test. The method used is the quantitative method in the form of questionnaire sheets and KGS-oriented acid-base chemistry questions. Construct validity using confirmatory first order analysis. Interterrater reliability using 3 raters and tested using two-way annova with Ebel formula. The reliability of the large class test used the cronbach alpha formula. content validity of each item in each 81.25% eligible category. Construct validity seen from the item polarity of the items has a positive Point Measure Correlation (Pt. Mea-Corr). A total of 32 items have a strong or high correlation number. Three questions, namely item number 23 (0.57), 27 (0.49), and 33 (0.67) have a moderate correlation. Reliability between expert raters was analyzed using the Ebel formula resulting in 0.79 which was in the currently category. Small class test reliability 0.97 high category. The reliability of the large class test item reliability is 0.90, personal reliability is 0.94, and the KR-20 is 0.99 which is classified as high. Thus, the level of generic science ability that has been tested for validity and Reliability can be used by educators to determine the level of students' generic science abilities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信