QUIC:对什么更好,对谁更好?

Sarah Cook, B. Mathieu, Patrick Truong, I. Hamchaoui
{"title":"QUIC:对什么更好,对谁更好?","authors":"Sarah Cook, B. Mathieu, Patrick Truong, I. Hamchaoui","doi":"10.1109/ICC.2017.7997281","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Many applications nowadays use HTTP. HTTP/2, standardised in February 2015, is an improvment of HTTP/1.1. However it is still running on top of TCP/TLS and can thus suffer from performance issues, such as the number of RTTs for the handshake phase and the Head of Line blocking. Google proposed the QUIC (Quick UDP Internet Connection) protocol, an user level protocol, running on top of UDP, to solve those issues. Google argues that the response time (Page Load Time) is shorter and thus the end-user experience better. First papers evaluated the intrinsic performances of QUIC, but none compared QUIC with the network, the website structure and the involved actors in mind. In this paper, we present the results of our evaluation, performed on a local testbed as well as on Internet, and our analysis to identify in which conditions QUIC is of interest, which actors can benefit from having QUIC deployed in the network and what impacts QUIC can lead to.","PeriodicalId":6517,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC)","volume":"36 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"66","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"QUIC: Better for what and for whom?\",\"authors\":\"Sarah Cook, B. Mathieu, Patrick Truong, I. Hamchaoui\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICC.2017.7997281\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Many applications nowadays use HTTP. HTTP/2, standardised in February 2015, is an improvment of HTTP/1.1. However it is still running on top of TCP/TLS and can thus suffer from performance issues, such as the number of RTTs for the handshake phase and the Head of Line blocking. Google proposed the QUIC (Quick UDP Internet Connection) protocol, an user level protocol, running on top of UDP, to solve those issues. Google argues that the response time (Page Load Time) is shorter and thus the end-user experience better. First papers evaluated the intrinsic performances of QUIC, but none compared QUIC with the network, the website structure and the involved actors in mind. In this paper, we present the results of our evaluation, performed on a local testbed as well as on Internet, and our analysis to identify in which conditions QUIC is of interest, which actors can benefit from having QUIC deployed in the network and what impacts QUIC can lead to.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6517,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC)\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"66\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2017.7997281\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICC.2017.7997281","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 66

摘要

现在许多应用程序都使用HTTP。HTTP/2于2015年2月标准化,是对HTTP/1.1的改进。然而,它仍然运行在TCP/TLS之上,因此可能会受到性能问题的影响,例如握手阶段的rtt数量和线头阻塞。b谷歌提出了QUIC (Quick UDP Internet Connection)协议,一种运行在UDP之上的用户级协议,来解决这些问题。谷歌认为响应时间(页面加载时间)更短,因此最终用户体验更好。第一篇论文评价了QUIC的内在性能,但没有将QUIC与网络、网站结构和所涉及的参与者进行比较。在本文中,我们展示了我们在本地测试平台和互联网上进行的评估结果,以及我们的分析,以确定在哪些条件下QUIC是感兴趣的,哪些参与者可以从在网络中部署QUIC中受益,以及QUIC可能导致的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
QUIC: Better for what and for whom?
Many applications nowadays use HTTP. HTTP/2, standardised in February 2015, is an improvment of HTTP/1.1. However it is still running on top of TCP/TLS and can thus suffer from performance issues, such as the number of RTTs for the handshake phase and the Head of Line blocking. Google proposed the QUIC (Quick UDP Internet Connection) protocol, an user level protocol, running on top of UDP, to solve those issues. Google argues that the response time (Page Load Time) is shorter and thus the end-user experience better. First papers evaluated the intrinsic performances of QUIC, but none compared QUIC with the network, the website structure and the involved actors in mind. In this paper, we present the results of our evaluation, performed on a local testbed as well as on Internet, and our analysis to identify in which conditions QUIC is of interest, which actors can benefit from having QUIC deployed in the network and what impacts QUIC can lead to.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信