特别会议:数据伦理和负责任数据管理的技术研究议程

Julia Stoyanovich, Bill Howe, H. Jagadish
{"title":"特别会议:数据伦理和负责任数据管理的技术研究议程","authors":"Julia Stoyanovich, Bill Howe, H. Jagadish","doi":"10.1145/3183713.3205185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SESSION DESCRIPTION Recently, there has begun a movement towards fairness, accountability, and transparency (FAT) in algorithmic decision making, and in data science more broadly [1–4]. The database community has not been significantly involved in this movement, despite “owning” the models, languages, and systems that produce the input to the machine learning applications that are often the focus in data science. If training data are biased, or have errors, it stands to reason that the algorithmic result will also be unfair or erroneous. Similarly, transparency of just the algorithm is usually insufficient to understand why certain results were obtained: one needs also to know the data used. In short, FAT depend not just on the algorithm, but also on the data. This observation raises several important questions: What are the core data management issues to which the objectives of fairness, accountability and transparency give rise? What role should the database community play in this movement? Will emphasis on these topics dilute our core competency in techniques and technologies for data, or can it reinforce our central role in technology stacks ranging from startups to the enterprise, and from local non-profits to the federal government? This special session features leading researchers from machine learning, software engineering, security and privacy, and natural language processing, who are doing exciting technical work in FAT. The goal of this session is to outline a technical research agenda in data management foundations and systems around data ethics.","PeriodicalId":20430,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Management of Data","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Special Session: A Technical Research Agenda in Data Ethics and Responsible Data Management\",\"authors\":\"Julia Stoyanovich, Bill Howe, H. Jagadish\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3183713.3205185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SESSION DESCRIPTION Recently, there has begun a movement towards fairness, accountability, and transparency (FAT) in algorithmic decision making, and in data science more broadly [1–4]. The database community has not been significantly involved in this movement, despite “owning” the models, languages, and systems that produce the input to the machine learning applications that are often the focus in data science. If training data are biased, or have errors, it stands to reason that the algorithmic result will also be unfair or erroneous. Similarly, transparency of just the algorithm is usually insufficient to understand why certain results were obtained: one needs also to know the data used. In short, FAT depend not just on the algorithm, but also on the data. This observation raises several important questions: What are the core data management issues to which the objectives of fairness, accountability and transparency give rise? What role should the database community play in this movement? Will emphasis on these topics dilute our core competency in techniques and technologies for data, or can it reinforce our central role in technology stacks ranging from startups to the enterprise, and from local non-profits to the federal government? This special session features leading researchers from machine learning, software engineering, security and privacy, and natural language processing, who are doing exciting technical work in FAT. The goal of this session is to outline a technical research agenda in data management foundations and systems around data ethics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20430,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Management of Data\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Management of Data\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3183713.3205185\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2018 International Conference on Management of Data","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3183713.3205185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

最近,在算法决策和更广泛的数据科学中,开始出现一种朝着公平、问责和透明(FAT)的运动[1-4]。尽管“拥有”为机器学习应用程序(通常是数据科学的焦点)提供输入的模型、语言和系统,但数据库社区并没有明显地参与到这一运动中。如果训练数据有偏差,或者有错误,那么理所当然,算法的结果也会不公平或错误。同样,仅仅是算法的透明度通常不足以理解为什么会得到某些结果:人们还需要知道所使用的数据。简而言之,FAT不仅依赖于算法,还依赖于数据。这一观察提出了几个重要的问题:公平、问责和透明的目标所产生的核心数据管理问题是什么?数据库社区在这场运动中应该扮演什么角色?对这些主题的强调会削弱我们在数据技术和技术方面的核心竞争力,还是会加强我们在从初创公司到企业,从地方非营利组织到联邦政府的技术堆栈中的核心作用?本次特别会议邀请了来自机器学习、软件工程、安全和隐私以及自然语言处理领域的领先研究人员,他们正在FAT领域从事令人兴奋的技术工作。本次会议的目标是围绕数据伦理概述数据管理基础和系统的技术研究议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Special Session: A Technical Research Agenda in Data Ethics and Responsible Data Management
SESSION DESCRIPTION Recently, there has begun a movement towards fairness, accountability, and transparency (FAT) in algorithmic decision making, and in data science more broadly [1–4]. The database community has not been significantly involved in this movement, despite “owning” the models, languages, and systems that produce the input to the machine learning applications that are often the focus in data science. If training data are biased, or have errors, it stands to reason that the algorithmic result will also be unfair or erroneous. Similarly, transparency of just the algorithm is usually insufficient to understand why certain results were obtained: one needs also to know the data used. In short, FAT depend not just on the algorithm, but also on the data. This observation raises several important questions: What are the core data management issues to which the objectives of fairness, accountability and transparency give rise? What role should the database community play in this movement? Will emphasis on these topics dilute our core competency in techniques and technologies for data, or can it reinforce our central role in technology stacks ranging from startups to the enterprise, and from local non-profits to the federal government? This special session features leading researchers from machine learning, software engineering, security and privacy, and natural language processing, who are doing exciting technical work in FAT. The goal of this session is to outline a technical research agenda in data management foundations and systems around data ethics.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信