法兹鲁尔·拉赫曼在科学统一性发展背景下的双重运动思想

Nasitotul Janah, Irham Nugroho
{"title":"法兹鲁尔·拉赫曼在科学统一性发展背景下的双重运动思想","authors":"Nasitotul Janah, Irham Nugroho","doi":"10.31603/tarbiyatuna.v13i1.5718","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paradigms of rationalism, empiricism and positivism as the basis for the development of Western science adopted by the Islamic world have led to the emergence of a dichotomy and dualism that puts science and religion a vis a. The implication is that science becomes value-less, wild, secular and sometimes destructive. Science and religion are two independent entities, do not interfere with each other and are in different zones, even their relationship is sometimes colored by conflict that negates each other. To find a solution to this situation, ideas and concepts for the integration of science and religion, such as de-westernization and Islamization of knowledge, emerged from Islamic thinkers as an effort to build a more harmonious, conducive, and constructive relationship between science and religion. However, this idea received resistance from Fazlurrahman because according to him science is objective so that Islamization or dewesternization is not needed, but rather integration or unity of science. This research is a library research. Sources of data were obtained through various written works, both in the form of books and journals, to find out how relevant Fazlurrahman's thoughts are in the context of developing unity of science in the Islamic world. The results of this study offer the concept of returning knowledge to its natural state by placing Allah as the main source of knowledge in the context of the ontological dimension; making the universe (kauniyyah verse) and sacred texts of the holy book (qauliyyah verse) a source of knowledge in the context of the epistemological dimension; in its application and implementation, science must have a moral responsibility to humanistic values ​​in the context of the axiological dimension.","PeriodicalId":32378,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Tarbiyatuna","volume":"28 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fazlur Rahman's Thoughts of Double Movement in the Context of the Development of Unity of Sciences\",\"authors\":\"Nasitotul Janah, Irham Nugroho\",\"doi\":\"10.31603/tarbiyatuna.v13i1.5718\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paradigms of rationalism, empiricism and positivism as the basis for the development of Western science adopted by the Islamic world have led to the emergence of a dichotomy and dualism that puts science and religion a vis a. The implication is that science becomes value-less, wild, secular and sometimes destructive. Science and religion are two independent entities, do not interfere with each other and are in different zones, even their relationship is sometimes colored by conflict that negates each other. To find a solution to this situation, ideas and concepts for the integration of science and religion, such as de-westernization and Islamization of knowledge, emerged from Islamic thinkers as an effort to build a more harmonious, conducive, and constructive relationship between science and religion. However, this idea received resistance from Fazlurrahman because according to him science is objective so that Islamization or dewesternization is not needed, but rather integration or unity of science. This research is a library research. Sources of data were obtained through various written works, both in the form of books and journals, to find out how relevant Fazlurrahman's thoughts are in the context of developing unity of science in the Islamic world. The results of this study offer the concept of returning knowledge to its natural state by placing Allah as the main source of knowledge in the context of the ontological dimension; making the universe (kauniyyah verse) and sacred texts of the holy book (qauliyyah verse) a source of knowledge in the context of the epistemological dimension; in its application and implementation, science must have a moral responsibility to humanistic values ​​in the context of the axiological dimension.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32378,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Tarbiyatuna\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Tarbiyatuna\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31603/tarbiyatuna.v13i1.5718\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Tarbiyatuna","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31603/tarbiyatuna.v13i1.5718","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

理性主义、经验主义和实证主义范式作为西方科学发展的基础,被伊斯兰世界所采用,导致了一种二分法和二元论的出现,这种二分法和二元论将科学与宗教对立起来。这意味着科学变得没有价值、狂野、世俗,有时甚至是破坏性的。科学和宗教是两个独立的实体,互不干涉,处于不同的区域,甚至它们的关系有时也会被相互否定的冲突所影响。为了解决这一问题,伊斯兰思想家提出了科学与宗教融合的思想和概念,如知识的去西方化和伊斯兰化,试图在科学与宗教之间建立一种更和谐、更有益、更有建设性的关系。然而,这个想法遭到了Fazlurrahman的抵制,因为在他看来,科学是客观的,因此不需要伊斯兰化或去西方化,而是需要科学的整合或统一。这个研究是一个图书馆研究。数据来源是通过各种书面作品获得的,包括书籍和期刊的形式,以找出Fazlurrahman的思想在伊斯兰世界发展科学统一的背景下是如何相关的。本研究的结果通过将安拉作为本体论维度背景下的主要知识来源,提供了将知识回归自然状态的概念;使宇宙(kauniyyah诗句)和圣书的神圣文本(qualliyyah诗句)成为认识论维度背景下的知识来源;在价值论维度的语境中,科学的应用和实施必须对人文价值承担道德责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fazlur Rahman's Thoughts of Double Movement in the Context of the Development of Unity of Sciences
The paradigms of rationalism, empiricism and positivism as the basis for the development of Western science adopted by the Islamic world have led to the emergence of a dichotomy and dualism that puts science and religion a vis a. The implication is that science becomes value-less, wild, secular and sometimes destructive. Science and religion are two independent entities, do not interfere with each other and are in different zones, even their relationship is sometimes colored by conflict that negates each other. To find a solution to this situation, ideas and concepts for the integration of science and religion, such as de-westernization and Islamization of knowledge, emerged from Islamic thinkers as an effort to build a more harmonious, conducive, and constructive relationship between science and religion. However, this idea received resistance from Fazlurrahman because according to him science is objective so that Islamization or dewesternization is not needed, but rather integration or unity of science. This research is a library research. Sources of data were obtained through various written works, both in the form of books and journals, to find out how relevant Fazlurrahman's thoughts are in the context of developing unity of science in the Islamic world. The results of this study offer the concept of returning knowledge to its natural state by placing Allah as the main source of knowledge in the context of the ontological dimension; making the universe (kauniyyah verse) and sacred texts of the holy book (qauliyyah verse) a source of knowledge in the context of the epistemological dimension; in its application and implementation, science must have a moral responsibility to humanistic values ​​in the context of the axiological dimension.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信