制定处方计划、身体规范和联邦营养政策

IF 0.8 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY
A. Higgins
{"title":"制定处方计划、身体规范和联邦营养政策","authors":"A. Higgins","doi":"10.1080/21604851.2021.1985837","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Food Justice – as a movement and scholarly literature – has necessarily argued for examinations of power and discrimination within food systems. However, much food justice literature has not fully examined the legislative process nor attended to its own anti-fat biases. This paper examines produce prescription programs (PPPs), focusing on key informant interviews with PPP organizers across the United States alongside participant observation at West Virginia PPPs. It argues that PPPs – and recent federal legislation which institutionalizes them – are based on prescribed conceptions of a “healthy body.” The paper considers how incentivization, a focus on chronic diet-related disease, concerns around risk, and the use of biometrics fall within the “weight-centered paradigm” of public health interventions. It ends with a brief consideration of legislation and policies that focus on structural concerns around food and health.","PeriodicalId":37967,"journal":{"name":"Fat Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Body Weight and Society","volume":"59 1","pages":"21 - 36"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Produce prescription programs, bodily norms, and federal nutrition policy\",\"authors\":\"A. Higgins\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21604851.2021.1985837\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Food Justice – as a movement and scholarly literature – has necessarily argued for examinations of power and discrimination within food systems. However, much food justice literature has not fully examined the legislative process nor attended to its own anti-fat biases. This paper examines produce prescription programs (PPPs), focusing on key informant interviews with PPP organizers across the United States alongside participant observation at West Virginia PPPs. It argues that PPPs – and recent federal legislation which institutionalizes them – are based on prescribed conceptions of a “healthy body.” The paper considers how incentivization, a focus on chronic diet-related disease, concerns around risk, and the use of biometrics fall within the “weight-centered paradigm” of public health interventions. It ends with a brief consideration of legislation and policies that focus on structural concerns around food and health.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37967,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fat Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Body Weight and Society\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"21 - 36\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fat Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Body Weight and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21604851.2021.1985837\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fat Studies-An Interdisciplinary Journal of Body Weight and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21604851.2021.1985837","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

作为一项运动和学术文献,食物正义必然主张对食物系统中的权力和歧视进行审查。然而,许多食品司法文献并没有充分审查立法程序,也没有注意到自己的反脂肪偏见。本文考察了生产处方项目(PPP),重点关注了与美国各地PPP组织者的关键线人访谈,以及西弗吉尼亚州PPP项目的参与者观察。它认为公私伙伴关系——以及最近将其制度化的联邦立法——是基于“健康身体”的规定概念。这篇论文考虑了激励、对慢性饮食相关疾病的关注、对风险的关注以及生物识别技术的使用如何落入公共卫生干预的“以体重为中心的范式”。最后,本文简要介绍了围绕食品和健康的结构性问题的立法和政策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Produce prescription programs, bodily norms, and federal nutrition policy
ABSTRACT Food Justice – as a movement and scholarly literature – has necessarily argued for examinations of power and discrimination within food systems. However, much food justice literature has not fully examined the legislative process nor attended to its own anti-fat biases. This paper examines produce prescription programs (PPPs), focusing on key informant interviews with PPP organizers across the United States alongside participant observation at West Virginia PPPs. It argues that PPPs – and recent federal legislation which institutionalizes them – are based on prescribed conceptions of a “healthy body.” The paper considers how incentivization, a focus on chronic diet-related disease, concerns around risk, and the use of biometrics fall within the “weight-centered paradigm” of public health interventions. It ends with a brief consideration of legislation and policies that focus on structural concerns around food and health.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
20.00%
发文量
32
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信