{"title":"Optimates/Populares","authors":"C. Rosillo-López","doi":"10.1093/obo/9780195389661-0323","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Populares and optimates are two political denominations, especially used in ancient Roman politics during the 1st century bce during the Late Roman Republic (although the sources apply them sometimes to the 2nd century bce). The basis of such differentiation is Marcus Tullius Cicero (106–43 bce), Pro Sestio 96, which defined populares and optimates as two distinct political categories. Popularis (adjective, singular of the plural populares in Latin) is an ambiguous term: it could connote “pleasing to the people” or “in the interest of the people”; the term to define the opposite of the senatorial majority, a combination of a certain political strategy and a certain type of political eloquence (eloquentia popularis) or, finally, a certain political tradition. Many politicians termed populares were tribunes of the plebs and some of them died or were murdered in violent confrontations with the Senate. The term optimates, or boni (a similar term, not exactly a synonym), rarely occur in the sources. People ascribed to this group in modern scholarship are those who believed in senatorial authority and/or those supporting the interests of the wealthy. However, identification can be also problematic. Some of the main sources are Cicero, Pro Sestio 96 (takes a negative view; main locus of the confrontation optimates-populares); Sallust, Bellum Catilinae 20; Bellum Iugurthinum 31 (Memmius’s speech) and 85 (Marius’s speech); Historiae 1.55 (Lepidus’s speech) and 3.48 (Macer’s speech). Sallust’s Epistulae ad Caesarem have been considered to be both fake and authentic (latest edition Antonio Duplá, Guillermo Fatás, and Francisco Pina Polo, Rem publicam restituere: una propuesta popularis para la crisis republicana: las Epistulae ad Caesarem de Salustio [Zaragoza, Spain: Departamento de ciencias de la antigüedad Universidad de Zaragoza, 1994] considers them authentic). Best introductions in English: Zvi Yavetz, Plebs and princeps (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1988); Nicola Mackie, Popularis ideology and popular politics at Rome in the first century B. C. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 135 (1992): 49–73; Margaret Robb, Beyond « populares » and « optimates »: political language in the late Republic (Stuttgart: Steiner, 2010); Antonio Duplá, “Consules populares,” in Consuls and res publica: holding high office in the Roman Republic, edited by Hans Beck, Antonio Duplá, Martin Jehne and Francisco Pina Polo (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 279–298; Claudia Tiersch, “Political Communication in the Late Roman Republic: Semantic Battles between Optimates and Populares?” in Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome. Speech, Audience and Decision, edited by H. van der Blom, C. Gray and C. Steel (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 35–68.","PeriodicalId":82164,"journal":{"name":"Nigeria and the classics","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigeria and the classics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/obo/9780195389661-0323","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
Populares和optimates是两个政治名称,特别是在公元前1世纪罗马共和国晚期的古罗马政治中使用(尽管资料来源有时将它们应用于公元前2世纪)。这种区分的基础是马库斯·图利乌斯·西塞罗(公元前106-43)的《96年论纲》(Pro Sestio 96),其中将平民和优选者定义为两个不同的政治类别。Popularis(形容词,拉丁语中复数populares的单数)是一个模棱两可的术语:它可能意味着“取悦人民”或“为了人民的利益”;这个术语用来定义参议院多数派的对立面,是某种政治策略和某种政治口才(eloquentia popularis)的结合,或者最后是某种政治传统的结合。许多被称为populares的政治家是平民的保民官,他们中的一些人在与元老院的暴力冲突中死亡或被谋杀。术语优化或boni(一个类似的术语,不完全是同义词)很少出现在源代码中。在现代学术界,属于这一群体的人是那些相信元老院权威和/或支持富人利益的人。然而,识别也是有问题的。一些主要的来源是西塞罗的《论文集》第96章(持否定观点;对抗的主要地点是最优者(populares);萨勒斯特,羽扇叶20;Bellum Iugurthinum 31 (Memmius的演讲)和85 (Marius的演讲);历史1.55(雷必达的演讲)和3.48(梅瑟的演讲)。萨勒斯特的《凯撒书信》被认为既假又真(最新版安东尼奥·杜普、吉列尔莫Fatás和弗朗西斯科·皮纳·波罗,《共和危机下的大众书信》:《凯撒书信》认为它们是真品[西班牙萨拉戈萨:萨拉戈萨大学科学学院,1994年])。最佳英文介绍:Zvi Yavetz, Plebs and princeps (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1988);尼古拉·麦基:《公元前一世纪罗马的大众意识形态与大众政治》,《莱茵博物馆》,《语言学》135 (1992):49-73;玛格丽特·罗伯:《超越“大众”和“最优者”:《共和国》晚期的政治语言》(斯图加特:施泰纳出版社,2010);安东尼奥·迪普勒,“平民执政官”,载于《执政官与共和政府:在罗马共和国担任高官》,由汉斯·贝克、安东尼奥·迪普勒、马丁·杰内和弗朗西斯科·皮纳·波罗编辑(英国剑桥:剑桥大学出版社,2011),第279-298页;克劳迪娅·蒂尔施(Claudia Tiersch):《罗马共和国晚期的政治传播:最优者与大众之间的语义之争?》摘自《共和罗马的制度与意识形态》。《演讲、听众与决策》,H. van der Blom、C. Gray和C. Steel主编(剑桥,英国:剑桥大学出版社,2018),第35-68页。
Populares and optimates are two political denominations, especially used in ancient Roman politics during the 1st century bce during the Late Roman Republic (although the sources apply them sometimes to the 2nd century bce). The basis of such differentiation is Marcus Tullius Cicero (106–43 bce), Pro Sestio 96, which defined populares and optimates as two distinct political categories. Popularis (adjective, singular of the plural populares in Latin) is an ambiguous term: it could connote “pleasing to the people” or “in the interest of the people”; the term to define the opposite of the senatorial majority, a combination of a certain political strategy and a certain type of political eloquence (eloquentia popularis) or, finally, a certain political tradition. Many politicians termed populares were tribunes of the plebs and some of them died or were murdered in violent confrontations with the Senate. The term optimates, or boni (a similar term, not exactly a synonym), rarely occur in the sources. People ascribed to this group in modern scholarship are those who believed in senatorial authority and/or those supporting the interests of the wealthy. However, identification can be also problematic. Some of the main sources are Cicero, Pro Sestio 96 (takes a negative view; main locus of the confrontation optimates-populares); Sallust, Bellum Catilinae 20; Bellum Iugurthinum 31 (Memmius’s speech) and 85 (Marius’s speech); Historiae 1.55 (Lepidus’s speech) and 3.48 (Macer’s speech). Sallust’s Epistulae ad Caesarem have been considered to be both fake and authentic (latest edition Antonio Duplá, Guillermo Fatás, and Francisco Pina Polo, Rem publicam restituere: una propuesta popularis para la crisis republicana: las Epistulae ad Caesarem de Salustio [Zaragoza, Spain: Departamento de ciencias de la antigüedad Universidad de Zaragoza, 1994] considers them authentic). Best introductions in English: Zvi Yavetz, Plebs and princeps (New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1988); Nicola Mackie, Popularis ideology and popular politics at Rome in the first century B. C. Rheinisches Museum für Philologie 135 (1992): 49–73; Margaret Robb, Beyond « populares » and « optimates »: political language in the late Republic (Stuttgart: Steiner, 2010); Antonio Duplá, “Consules populares,” in Consuls and res publica: holding high office in the Roman Republic, edited by Hans Beck, Antonio Duplá, Martin Jehne and Francisco Pina Polo (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2011), pp. 279–298; Claudia Tiersch, “Political Communication in the Late Roman Republic: Semantic Battles between Optimates and Populares?” in Institutions and Ideology in Republican Rome. Speech, Audience and Decision, edited by H. van der Blom, C. Gray and C. Steel (Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2018), pp. 35–68.