哥伦比亚青少年墨尔本决策问卷的心理测量特征分析

IF 1.1 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Arcadio de Jesús Cardona Isaza, Alicia Tamarit Chulia, Remedios González Barrón, I. Castilla
{"title":"哥伦比亚青少年墨尔本决策问卷的心理测量特征分析","authors":"Arcadio de Jesús Cardona Isaza, Alicia Tamarit Chulia, Remedios González Barrón, I. Castilla","doi":"10.14349/RLP.2021.V53.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background/objective: Decision-making is a set of skills useful for daily functioning which allow people to perform their tasks and control objectives and goals, generating responses to the environment’s demands from their resources. Research and intervention with adolescents require reliable instruments to assess decision-making. The Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire (MDMQ) is an instrument that assesses decision-making styles and has been successfully validated in different cultural contexts. This study analysed the psychometric properties, construct validity (factorial, convergent, and discriminant), and predictive validity of the MDMQ in Colombian adolescents. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted in which 822 adolescents aged 14 to 18 years (M = 16.09, SD = 1.31, 33.7% girls), 410 from the regular school system (M = 15.50, SD = 1.29, 48.54% girls) and 412 adolescents from the Criminal Responsibility System (M = 16.6, SD = 1.04, 18.93% girls) participated. Decision-making styles, emotional intelligence, cognitive distortions, prosocial behaviour and antisocial behaviour were assessed. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), reliability, correlational and predictive analyses were performed. Results: The CFA showed satisfactory fit indices for the original model of four factors and 22 items. Sufficient reliability conditions were observed. The results indicated that rational decision-making (vigilance) is positively associated with emotional intelligence and influences prosocial behaviour. Negative decision-making styles are associated with cognitive distortions and influence antisocial behaviour. Conclusions: After analysing the psychometric properties, it is concluded that the MDMQ is a valid instrument to assess the decision-making styles of Colombian adolescents. © 2021 Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Análisis de las propiedades psicométricas del Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire en adolescentes colombianos Resumen Antecedentes/objetivo: La toma de decisiones es un conjunto de habilidades útiles para el funcionamiento diario que permite a las personas realizar sus tareas y controlar objetivos y metas, generando respuestas a las demandas del entorno a partir de sus recursos. La investigación y la intervención con adolescentes requieren instrumentos fiables para evaluar la PALABRAS CLAVE Toma de decisiones, adolescentes, comportamiento prosocial, comportamiento antisocial","PeriodicalId":46559,"journal":{"name":"Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of the psychometric properties of the Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire in Colombian adolescents\",\"authors\":\"Arcadio de Jesús Cardona Isaza, Alicia Tamarit Chulia, Remedios González Barrón, I. Castilla\",\"doi\":\"10.14349/RLP.2021.V53.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background/objective: Decision-making is a set of skills useful for daily functioning which allow people to perform their tasks and control objectives and goals, generating responses to the environment’s demands from their resources. Research and intervention with adolescents require reliable instruments to assess decision-making. The Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire (MDMQ) is an instrument that assesses decision-making styles and has been successfully validated in different cultural contexts. This study analysed the psychometric properties, construct validity (factorial, convergent, and discriminant), and predictive validity of the MDMQ in Colombian adolescents. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted in which 822 adolescents aged 14 to 18 years (M = 16.09, SD = 1.31, 33.7% girls), 410 from the regular school system (M = 15.50, SD = 1.29, 48.54% girls) and 412 adolescents from the Criminal Responsibility System (M = 16.6, SD = 1.04, 18.93% girls) participated. Decision-making styles, emotional intelligence, cognitive distortions, prosocial behaviour and antisocial behaviour were assessed. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), reliability, correlational and predictive analyses were performed. Results: The CFA showed satisfactory fit indices for the original model of four factors and 22 items. Sufficient reliability conditions were observed. The results indicated that rational decision-making (vigilance) is positively associated with emotional intelligence and influences prosocial behaviour. Negative decision-making styles are associated with cognitive distortions and influence antisocial behaviour. Conclusions: After analysing the psychometric properties, it is concluded that the MDMQ is a valid instrument to assess the decision-making styles of Colombian adolescents. © 2021 Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Análisis de las propiedades psicométricas del Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire en adolescentes colombianos Resumen Antecedentes/objetivo: La toma de decisiones es un conjunto de habilidades útiles para el funcionamiento diario que permite a las personas realizar sus tareas y controlar objetivos y metas, generando respuestas a las demandas del entorno a partir de sus recursos. La investigación y la intervención con adolescentes requieren instrumentos fiables para evaluar la PALABRAS CLAVE Toma de decisiones, adolescentes, comportamiento prosocial, comportamiento antisocial\",\"PeriodicalId\":46559,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14349/RLP.2021.V53.6\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14349/RLP.2021.V53.6","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景/目的:决策是一套对日常运作有用的技能,它使人们能够执行任务和控制目标,从他们的资源中对环境的需求作出反应。对青少年的研究和干预需要可靠的工具来评估决策。墨尔本决策问卷(MDMQ)是一种评估决策风格的工具,并已在不同的文化背景下成功验证。本研究分析了哥伦比亚青少年MDMQ的心理测量特征、结构效度(析因、收敛和判别)和预测效度。方法:采用横断面研究方法,选取14 ~ 18岁青少年822名(M = 16.09, SD = 1.31,女生占33.7%),普通学校410名(M = 15.50, SD = 1.29,女生占48.54%),刑事责任制412名(M = 16.6, SD = 1.04,女生占18.93%)。评估了决策风格、情商、认知扭曲、亲社会行为和反社会行为。进行验证性因子分析(CFA)、信度分析、相关性分析和预测分析。结果:CFA对原模型的4个因素22个项目的拟合指标满意。观察到足够的信度条件。结果表明,理性决策(警惕性)与情绪智力呈正相关,并影响亲社会行为。消极的决策风格与认知扭曲和影响反社会行为有关。结论:通过分析哥伦比亚青少年的心理测量特征,得出MDMQ是评估哥伦比亚青少年决策风格的有效工具。©2021 Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz。这是一篇基于CC BY-NC-ND许可(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/)的开放获取文章。Análisis青少年与青少年之间的心理障碍和心理障碍决策问卷,青少年与青少年之间的心理障碍和心理障碍,青少年与青少年之间的心理障碍和心理障碍,青少年与青少年之间的心理障碍和心理障碍,青少年与青少年之间的心理障碍,青少年与青少年之间的心理障碍。La investigación y La intervención con青少年需要的工具para评估La PALABRAS CLAVE Toma de decisiones,青少年,组合到亲社会,组合到反社会
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analysis of the psychometric properties of the Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire in Colombian adolescents
Background/objective: Decision-making is a set of skills useful for daily functioning which allow people to perform their tasks and control objectives and goals, generating responses to the environment’s demands from their resources. Research and intervention with adolescents require reliable instruments to assess decision-making. The Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire (MDMQ) is an instrument that assesses decision-making styles and has been successfully validated in different cultural contexts. This study analysed the psychometric properties, construct validity (factorial, convergent, and discriminant), and predictive validity of the MDMQ in Colombian adolescents. Method: A cross-sectional study was conducted in which 822 adolescents aged 14 to 18 years (M = 16.09, SD = 1.31, 33.7% girls), 410 from the regular school system (M = 15.50, SD = 1.29, 48.54% girls) and 412 adolescents from the Criminal Responsibility System (M = 16.6, SD = 1.04, 18.93% girls) participated. Decision-making styles, emotional intelligence, cognitive distortions, prosocial behaviour and antisocial behaviour were assessed. Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA), reliability, correlational and predictive analyses were performed. Results: The CFA showed satisfactory fit indices for the original model of four factors and 22 items. Sufficient reliability conditions were observed. The results indicated that rational decision-making (vigilance) is positively associated with emotional intelligence and influences prosocial behaviour. Negative decision-making styles are associated with cognitive distortions and influence antisocial behaviour. Conclusions: After analysing the psychometric properties, it is concluded that the MDMQ is a valid instrument to assess the decision-making styles of Colombian adolescents. © 2021 Fundación Universitaria Konrad Lorenz. This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). Análisis de las propiedades psicométricas del Melbourne Decision Making Questionnaire en adolescentes colombianos Resumen Antecedentes/objetivo: La toma de decisiones es un conjunto de habilidades útiles para el funcionamiento diario que permite a las personas realizar sus tareas y controlar objetivos y metas, generando respuestas a las demandas del entorno a partir de sus recursos. La investigación y la intervención con adolescentes requieren instrumentos fiables para evaluar la PALABRAS CLAVE Toma de decisiones, adolescentes, comportamiento prosocial, comportamiento antisocial
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia
Revista Latinoamericana De Psicologia PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
1.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: Revista latinoamericana de Psicología (RLP) is a four month publication from Konrad Lorenz Fundación Universitaria. The RLP evaluates works that belong to one of the following categories: original papers (with empiric and new information) of many psychology fields (regardless of the methodology used) or qualitative/quantitative systematic reviews. Eventually it will be interested on works’ revision related to the development psychology tools or softwares, original methodology papers and researches which evaluate psychology from scientometry. The RLP is not interested in publishing non-systematic reviews or states of the art, case studies, protocols studies, hypothesis or papers proposals, letters, commentaries or essays, opinions articles, politics documents nor other sort of secondary literature. Traditionally, there have been monographics, books’ reviews and “others” published in “Mundo de la Psicología”, nevertheless these modalities will not be considered.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信