磷酸盐增溶:机理、成因及应用

N. Ahmed, Sadaf Shahab
{"title":"磷酸盐增溶:机理、成因及应用","authors":"N. Ahmed, Sadaf Shahab","doi":"10.5580/2327","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The global necessity to increase agricultural production from a steadily decreasing and degrading land resource base has placed considerable strain on agro ecosystems (Tilak, 2005). Current strategy is to maintain and improve agricultural productivity exclusively via the use of chemical fertilizers. Although the use of chemical fertilizers is credited with nearly fifty percent increase in agricultural production but they are closely associated with environmental pollution and health hazards (Gaur and Gaind, 1999). Many synthetic fertilizers contain acids, such as sulfuric acid and hydrochloric acid, which tend to increase the acidity of the soil, reduce the soil's beneficial organism population and interfere with plant growth. Generally, healthy soil contains enough nitrogen-fixing bacteria to fix sufficient atmospheric nitrogen to supply the needs of growing plants. However, continued use of chemical fertilizers may destroy these nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Furthermore, chemical fertilizers may affect plant health. For example, citrus trees tend to yield fruits that are lower in vitamin C when treated with synthetic fertilizer. Lack of trace elements in soil regularly dosed with chemical fertilizers is not uncommon. This lack of vital micronutrients can generally be attributed to the use of chemical fertilizers. On the other hand Biofertilizer adds nutrients to soil.Environmentally friendly biotechnological approaches offer alternatives to chemical fertilizers (Dobbelaere et al., 2003). Given the negative environmental impacts of chemical fertilizers and their increasing costs, the use of PGPB is thus being considered as an alternative or a supplemental way of reducing the use of chemicals in agriculture (De Weger et al., 1995; Gerhardson, 2002, Postma, et al., 2003; Welbaum, 2004)","PeriodicalId":22514,"journal":{"name":"The Internet journal of microbiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"48","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Phosphate Solubilization: Their Mechanism Genetics And Application\",\"authors\":\"N. Ahmed, Sadaf Shahab\",\"doi\":\"10.5580/2327\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The global necessity to increase agricultural production from a steadily decreasing and degrading land resource base has placed considerable strain on agro ecosystems (Tilak, 2005). Current strategy is to maintain and improve agricultural productivity exclusively via the use of chemical fertilizers. Although the use of chemical fertilizers is credited with nearly fifty percent increase in agricultural production but they are closely associated with environmental pollution and health hazards (Gaur and Gaind, 1999). Many synthetic fertilizers contain acids, such as sulfuric acid and hydrochloric acid, which tend to increase the acidity of the soil, reduce the soil's beneficial organism population and interfere with plant growth. Generally, healthy soil contains enough nitrogen-fixing bacteria to fix sufficient atmospheric nitrogen to supply the needs of growing plants. However, continued use of chemical fertilizers may destroy these nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Furthermore, chemical fertilizers may affect plant health. For example, citrus trees tend to yield fruits that are lower in vitamin C when treated with synthetic fertilizer. Lack of trace elements in soil regularly dosed with chemical fertilizers is not uncommon. This lack of vital micronutrients can generally be attributed to the use of chemical fertilizers. On the other hand Biofertilizer adds nutrients to soil.Environmentally friendly biotechnological approaches offer alternatives to chemical fertilizers (Dobbelaere et al., 2003). Given the negative environmental impacts of chemical fertilizers and their increasing costs, the use of PGPB is thus being considered as an alternative or a supplemental way of reducing the use of chemicals in agriculture (De Weger et al., 1995; Gerhardson, 2002, Postma, et al., 2003; Welbaum, 2004)\",\"PeriodicalId\":22514,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Internet journal of microbiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-12-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"48\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Internet journal of microbiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5580/2327\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Internet journal of microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5580/2327","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 48

摘要

全球需要从不断减少和退化的土地资源基础上增加农业生产,这给农业生态系统带来了相当大的压力(Tilak, 2005)。目前的战略是完全通过使用化肥来维持和提高农业生产力。虽然化肥的使用使农业产量增加了近50%,但它们与环境污染和健康危害密切相关(Gaur和Gaind, 1999年)。许多合成肥料含有酸,如硫酸和盐酸,容易增加土壤的酸度,减少土壤的有益生物种群,干扰植物生长。一般来说,健康的土壤含有足够的固氮细菌来固定足够的大气氮,以满足生长植物的需要。然而,持续使用化肥可能会破坏这些固氮细菌。此外,化肥可能影响植物健康。例如,柑橘树在使用合成肥料处理后,往往会结出维生素C含量较低的果实。定期施用化肥的土壤中缺乏微量元素的现象并不罕见。这种重要微量营养素的缺乏通常可归因于化肥的使用。另一方面,生物肥料给土壤增加养分。环境友好型生物技术方法提供了化肥的替代品(Dobbelaere等人,2003年)。鉴于化学肥料对环境的负面影响及其不断增加的成本,因此,使用PGPB被认为是减少农业化学品使用的一种替代或补充方法(De Weger等人,1995;Gerhardson, 2002; Postma等,2003;Welbaum, 2004)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Phosphate Solubilization: Their Mechanism Genetics And Application
The global necessity to increase agricultural production from a steadily decreasing and degrading land resource base has placed considerable strain on agro ecosystems (Tilak, 2005). Current strategy is to maintain and improve agricultural productivity exclusively via the use of chemical fertilizers. Although the use of chemical fertilizers is credited with nearly fifty percent increase in agricultural production but they are closely associated with environmental pollution and health hazards (Gaur and Gaind, 1999). Many synthetic fertilizers contain acids, such as sulfuric acid and hydrochloric acid, which tend to increase the acidity of the soil, reduce the soil's beneficial organism population and interfere with plant growth. Generally, healthy soil contains enough nitrogen-fixing bacteria to fix sufficient atmospheric nitrogen to supply the needs of growing plants. However, continued use of chemical fertilizers may destroy these nitrogen-fixing bacteria. Furthermore, chemical fertilizers may affect plant health. For example, citrus trees tend to yield fruits that are lower in vitamin C when treated with synthetic fertilizer. Lack of trace elements in soil regularly dosed with chemical fertilizers is not uncommon. This lack of vital micronutrients can generally be attributed to the use of chemical fertilizers. On the other hand Biofertilizer adds nutrients to soil.Environmentally friendly biotechnological approaches offer alternatives to chemical fertilizers (Dobbelaere et al., 2003). Given the negative environmental impacts of chemical fertilizers and their increasing costs, the use of PGPB is thus being considered as an alternative or a supplemental way of reducing the use of chemicals in agriculture (De Weger et al., 1995; Gerhardson, 2002, Postma, et al., 2003; Welbaum, 2004)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信