市场知道多少?

Irina Maxime Luneva
{"title":"市场知道多少?","authors":"Irina Maxime Luneva","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3926288","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Market participants acquire different types of information from many sources to inform their trading decisions. This paper uses structural estimation to quantify the amounts of two types of information that the market has: fundamental information – about firm value – and misreporting incentives information –about managers’ incentives to manage earnings. I further measure accounting quality and price efficiency that result from the market’s information endowment. I find that, before the manager’s report is released, the market knows 19.5% of fundamental and 36.6% of misreporting incentives information available to the manager. In equilibrium, accounting quality increases in the market’s fraction of fundamental information and decreases in the market’s fraction of misreporting incentives information, while price efficiency increases with both information types. The elasticity of accounting quality (price efficiency)with respect to the market’s fundamental information is 0.065 (0.217), and with respect to the market’s misreporting incentives information is -0.154 (0.059). I apply my technique to measure the amount of information that the market learned after the compensation disclosure regulation in 2006 and find that the fraction of misreporting incentives information in the market’s hands increased more than 1.5 times: from 21.8% to 38.1%. As a result, equilibrium accounting quality (price efficiency) decreased by 2.87%(increased by 1.30%).","PeriodicalId":18611,"journal":{"name":"Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets eJournal","volume":"73 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Much Does the Market Know?\",\"authors\":\"Irina Maxime Luneva\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3926288\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Market participants acquire different types of information from many sources to inform their trading decisions. This paper uses structural estimation to quantify the amounts of two types of information that the market has: fundamental information – about firm value – and misreporting incentives information –about managers’ incentives to manage earnings. I further measure accounting quality and price efficiency that result from the market’s information endowment. I find that, before the manager’s report is released, the market knows 19.5% of fundamental and 36.6% of misreporting incentives information available to the manager. In equilibrium, accounting quality increases in the market’s fraction of fundamental information and decreases in the market’s fraction of misreporting incentives information, while price efficiency increases with both information types. The elasticity of accounting quality (price efficiency)with respect to the market’s fundamental information is 0.065 (0.217), and with respect to the market’s misreporting incentives information is -0.154 (0.059). I apply my technique to measure the amount of information that the market learned after the compensation disclosure regulation in 2006 and find that the fraction of misreporting incentives information in the market’s hands increased more than 1.5 times: from 21.8% to 38.1%. As a result, equilibrium accounting quality (price efficiency) decreased by 2.87%(increased by 1.30%).\",\"PeriodicalId\":18611,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets eJournal\",\"volume\":\"73 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3926288\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microeconomics: General Equilibrium & Disequilibrium Models of Financial Markets eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3926288","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

市场参与者从许多来源获取不同类型的信息,为他们的交易决策提供信息。本文使用结构估计来量化市场拥有的两类信息的数量:关于公司价值的基本信息和错误报告的激励信息——关于经理管理收益的激励。本文进一步衡量了由市场信息禀赋产生的会计质量和价格效率。我发现,在经理的报告发布之前,市场知道19.5%的基本激励信息和36.6%的误报激励信息。在均衡状态下,会计质量在基本信息的市场份额中增加,在错误报告激励信息的市场份额中减少,而价格效率在两种信息类型中都增加。会计质量(价格效率)相对于市场基本信息的弹性为0.065(0.217),相对于市场误报激励信息的弹性为-0.154(0.059)。我运用我的技术来衡量2006年薪酬披露法规出台后市场了解到的信息量,发现市场手中错误报告激励信息的比例增加了1.5倍多:从21.8%增加到38.1%。结果,均衡会计质量(价格效率)下降了2.87%(增加了1.30%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How Much Does the Market Know?
Market participants acquire different types of information from many sources to inform their trading decisions. This paper uses structural estimation to quantify the amounts of two types of information that the market has: fundamental information – about firm value – and misreporting incentives information –about managers’ incentives to manage earnings. I further measure accounting quality and price efficiency that result from the market’s information endowment. I find that, before the manager’s report is released, the market knows 19.5% of fundamental and 36.6% of misreporting incentives information available to the manager. In equilibrium, accounting quality increases in the market’s fraction of fundamental information and decreases in the market’s fraction of misreporting incentives information, while price efficiency increases with both information types. The elasticity of accounting quality (price efficiency)with respect to the market’s fundamental information is 0.065 (0.217), and with respect to the market’s misreporting incentives information is -0.154 (0.059). I apply my technique to measure the amount of information that the market learned after the compensation disclosure regulation in 2006 and find that the fraction of misreporting incentives information in the market’s hands increased more than 1.5 times: from 21.8% to 38.1%. As a result, equilibrium accounting quality (price efficiency) decreased by 2.87%(increased by 1.30%).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信