{"title":"编者注","authors":"M. Montesano, B. Loh, T. Chong","doi":"10.1080/08929882.2016.1235375","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present issue of SOJOURN features five research articles bearing on religion, on archaeology and heritage, and on the on-the-ground realities of ASEAN integration. The contributions touching on religion treat extra-regional contacts, official accommodation of beliefs long concealed as unorthodox and the intersection of religious practice and ethnic identity. With great erudition, John Chen examines Chinese Muslims’ interest in Southeast Asia as an important part of the wider Islamic world during the first half of the twentieth century. Focusing on scholarship on materia medica and on the remarkable story of the Chinese Islamic South Seas Delegation’s visit to Malaya, Chen illuminates a clear interest among Chinese Muslims in Islamic lands beyond just those of the Arab Middle East. He understands that interest in “civilizational” terms. Philippe Peycam’s article examines the history and dynamics of the International Coordination Committee for the Safeguarding of the Historic Site of Angkor and assesses its negotiation among international, national and local interests as those interests intersect at a UNESCO World Heritage Site. He focuses on the interaction with Cambodian authorities of the representatives of France and Japan, which have co-chaired that committee, and expresses scepticism about the usefulness of the Angkor committee as a model for effective stewardship of World Heritage Sites in other parts of the world. In a second article on Cambodia, Emiko Stock offers a lively and iconoclastic treatment of the Cham rituals of the Imam San Mawlid and the Mamun possession ceremony to interrogate the ethnic categorization that would distinguish Cham from Khmer. Her article makes an important, and extremely enjoyable, contribution to our efforts to rethink conceptions of identity, ethnicity and history in contemporary Southeast Asia.","PeriodicalId":55952,"journal":{"name":"Science & Global Security","volume":"24 1","pages":"139 - 140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2016-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editors' Note\",\"authors\":\"M. Montesano, B. Loh, T. Chong\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/08929882.2016.1235375\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present issue of SOJOURN features five research articles bearing on religion, on archaeology and heritage, and on the on-the-ground realities of ASEAN integration. The contributions touching on religion treat extra-regional contacts, official accommodation of beliefs long concealed as unorthodox and the intersection of religious practice and ethnic identity. With great erudition, John Chen examines Chinese Muslims’ interest in Southeast Asia as an important part of the wider Islamic world during the first half of the twentieth century. Focusing on scholarship on materia medica and on the remarkable story of the Chinese Islamic South Seas Delegation’s visit to Malaya, Chen illuminates a clear interest among Chinese Muslims in Islamic lands beyond just those of the Arab Middle East. He understands that interest in “civilizational” terms. Philippe Peycam’s article examines the history and dynamics of the International Coordination Committee for the Safeguarding of the Historic Site of Angkor and assesses its negotiation among international, national and local interests as those interests intersect at a UNESCO World Heritage Site. He focuses on the interaction with Cambodian authorities of the representatives of France and Japan, which have co-chaired that committee, and expresses scepticism about the usefulness of the Angkor committee as a model for effective stewardship of World Heritage Sites in other parts of the world. In a second article on Cambodia, Emiko Stock offers a lively and iconoclastic treatment of the Cham rituals of the Imam San Mawlid and the Mamun possession ceremony to interrogate the ethnic categorization that would distinguish Cham from Khmer. Her article makes an important, and extremely enjoyable, contribution to our efforts to rethink conceptions of identity, ethnicity and history in contemporary Southeast Asia.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Science & Global Security\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"139 - 140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Science & Global Security\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/08929882.2016.1235375\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Global Security","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08929882.2016.1235375","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本期《SOJOURN》刊载了五篇研究文章,内容涉及宗教、考古和遗产以及东盟一体化的实际情况。涉及宗教的贡献涉及区域外的接触、长期被隐藏为非正统的信仰的官方适应以及宗教实践和种族认同的交集。约翰·陈以其渊博的学识考察了20世纪上半叶中国穆斯林对东南亚的兴趣,认为东南亚是更广泛的伊斯兰世界的重要组成部分。陈着重于本草学术和中国伊斯兰南海代表团访问马来亚的非凡故事,阐明了中国穆斯林对伊斯兰土地的明显兴趣,而不仅仅是阿拉伯中东地区。他理解这种对“文明”的兴趣。Philippe Peycam的文章考察了吴哥古迹保护国际协调委员会的历史和动态,并评估了其在国际、国家和地方利益之间的谈判,因为这些利益在联合国教科文组织世界遗产中相交。他着重讨论了法国和日本代表与柬埔寨当局的互动,这两个国家是该委员会的共同主席,他对吴哥委员会能否作为有效管理世界其他地区世界遗产的典范表示怀疑。在另一篇关于柬埔寨的文章中,Emiko Stock生动地、破除传统地描述了占族伊訇圣毛利德(Imam San Mawlid)的仪式,以及马蒙(Mamun)的占有仪式,以质问将占族与高棉区分开来的族群分类。她的文章为我们重新思考当代东南亚的身份、种族和历史概念做出了重要而令人愉快的贡献。
The present issue of SOJOURN features five research articles bearing on religion, on archaeology and heritage, and on the on-the-ground realities of ASEAN integration. The contributions touching on religion treat extra-regional contacts, official accommodation of beliefs long concealed as unorthodox and the intersection of religious practice and ethnic identity. With great erudition, John Chen examines Chinese Muslims’ interest in Southeast Asia as an important part of the wider Islamic world during the first half of the twentieth century. Focusing on scholarship on materia medica and on the remarkable story of the Chinese Islamic South Seas Delegation’s visit to Malaya, Chen illuminates a clear interest among Chinese Muslims in Islamic lands beyond just those of the Arab Middle East. He understands that interest in “civilizational” terms. Philippe Peycam’s article examines the history and dynamics of the International Coordination Committee for the Safeguarding of the Historic Site of Angkor and assesses its negotiation among international, national and local interests as those interests intersect at a UNESCO World Heritage Site. He focuses on the interaction with Cambodian authorities of the representatives of France and Japan, which have co-chaired that committee, and expresses scepticism about the usefulness of the Angkor committee as a model for effective stewardship of World Heritage Sites in other parts of the world. In a second article on Cambodia, Emiko Stock offers a lively and iconoclastic treatment of the Cham rituals of the Imam San Mawlid and the Mamun possession ceremony to interrogate the ethnic categorization that would distinguish Cham from Khmer. Her article makes an important, and extremely enjoyable, contribution to our efforts to rethink conceptions of identity, ethnicity and history in contemporary Southeast Asia.