基于agent的公共池实验中不平等、信任和沟通互动模型

M. Janssen, D. DeCaro, Allen Lee
{"title":"基于agent的公共池实验中不平等、信任和沟通互动模型","authors":"M. Janssen, D. DeCaro, Allen Lee","doi":"10.18564/jasss.4922","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": An agent-based model is presented that aims to capture the involvement of inequality and trust in collective action in a classic commons dilemma before, during, and after communication. The model assumptions are based on the behavioral theory of collective action of Elinor Ostrom and the ‘humanistic rational choice theory’. The commons dilemma is represented as a spatially explicit renewable resource. Agent’s trust in others has an impact on the harvesting of shared resources, and trust is influenced by observed harvesting behavior and cheap talk. We calibrated the model using data from a prior set of lab experiments on inequality, trust, and communication. The best fit to the data consists of a population with a small share of altruistic and selfishagentsandamajorityofconditionalcooperativeagentssensitivetoinequalityandwhowouldcooperateifothersdid.Communicationincreasedtrustexplainingthebettergroupperformancewhencommunication wasintroduced.Themodelingresultscomplementpriorcommunicationresearchandclarifythedynamicsof reciprocalcooperationcommonlyobservedinrobustresourcegovernancesystems.","PeriodicalId":14675,"journal":{"name":"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.","volume":"195 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An Agent-Based Model of the Interaction Between Inequality, Trust, and Communication in Common Pool Experiments\",\"authors\":\"M. Janssen, D. DeCaro, Allen Lee\",\"doi\":\"10.18564/jasss.4922\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\": An agent-based model is presented that aims to capture the involvement of inequality and trust in collective action in a classic commons dilemma before, during, and after communication. The model assumptions are based on the behavioral theory of collective action of Elinor Ostrom and the ‘humanistic rational choice theory’. The commons dilemma is represented as a spatially explicit renewable resource. Agent’s trust in others has an impact on the harvesting of shared resources, and trust is influenced by observed harvesting behavior and cheap talk. We calibrated the model using data from a prior set of lab experiments on inequality, trust, and communication. The best fit to the data consists of a population with a small share of altruistic and selfishagentsandamajorityofconditionalcooperativeagentssensitivetoinequalityandwhowouldcooperateifothersdid.Communicationincreasedtrustexplainingthebettergroupperformancewhencommunication wasintroduced.Themodelingresultscomplementpriorcommunicationresearchandclarifythedynamicsof reciprocalcooperationcommonlyobservedinrobustresourcegovernancesystems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14675,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.\",\"volume\":\"195 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.4922\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18564/jasss.4922","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文提出了一个基于主体的模型,旨在捕捉在交流前、交流中和交流后的经典公地困境中不平等和信任对集体行动的影响。该模型的假设基于埃莉诺·奥斯特罗姆的集体行动行为理论和“人本主义理性选择理论”。公地困境表现为空间上明确的可再生资源。Agent对他人的信任影响共享资源的收获,信任受观察到的收获行为和廉价谈话的影响。我们使用先前一组关于不平等、信任和沟通的实验室实验数据来校准模型。最符合数据的是这样一个群体,其中有一小部分利他和自私的个体,以及大多数对不平等敏感的有条件的合作个体,如果其他人合作,他们会合作。Communicationincreasedtrustexplainingthebettergroupperformancewhencommunication判别。Themodelingresultscomplementpriorcommunicationresearchandclarifythedynamicsof reciprocalcooperationcommonlyobservedinrobustresourcegovernancesystems。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An Agent-Based Model of the Interaction Between Inequality, Trust, and Communication in Common Pool Experiments
: An agent-based model is presented that aims to capture the involvement of inequality and trust in collective action in a classic commons dilemma before, during, and after communication. The model assumptions are based on the behavioral theory of collective action of Elinor Ostrom and the ‘humanistic rational choice theory’. The commons dilemma is represented as a spatially explicit renewable resource. Agent’s trust in others has an impact on the harvesting of shared resources, and trust is influenced by observed harvesting behavior and cheap talk. We calibrated the model using data from a prior set of lab experiments on inequality, trust, and communication. The best fit to the data consists of a population with a small share of altruistic and selfishagentsandamajorityofconditionalcooperativeagentssensitivetoinequalityandwhowouldcooperateifothersdid.Communicationincreasedtrustexplainingthebettergroupperformancewhencommunication wasintroduced.Themodelingresultscomplementpriorcommunicationresearchandclarifythedynamicsof reciprocalcooperationcommonlyobservedinrobustresourcegovernancesystems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信