超声穿孔和电穿孔在细胞转染中的实验比较

J. Pepe, M. Rincón, Junru Wu
{"title":"超声穿孔和电穿孔在细胞转染中的实验比较","authors":"J. Pepe, M. Rincón, Junru Wu","doi":"10.1121/1.1652111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"An experimental study has been performed for cell suspensions to compare efficiency of cell transfection. It was demonstrated that electroporation was superior to sonoporation in terms of viability (65.8±2.3% vs 50.8±4.15%) and transfection efficiency (15.83±3.5% vs 7.53±0.4%) for Jurkat lymphocytes (nonprimary cells), and sonoporation was better in terms of viability (64.8±1.51% vs 53.7±1.53%) and transfection efficiency (2.73±0.21% vs 0.43±0.06%) for human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (primary cells). The electroporation was performed using a Gene Pulser® II Apparatus with voltage of 250 V, and the sonoporation was achieved using 2-MHz pulsed ultrasound exposure (ISPPA=80 W/cm2) assisted with encapsulated bubbles (Optison®).","PeriodicalId":87384,"journal":{"name":"Acoustics research letters online : ARLO","volume":"33 1","pages":"62-67"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"32","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental comparison of sonoporation and electroporation in cell transfection applications\",\"authors\":\"J. Pepe, M. Rincón, Junru Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1121/1.1652111\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"An experimental study has been performed for cell suspensions to compare efficiency of cell transfection. It was demonstrated that electroporation was superior to sonoporation in terms of viability (65.8±2.3% vs 50.8±4.15%) and transfection efficiency (15.83±3.5% vs 7.53±0.4%) for Jurkat lymphocytes (nonprimary cells), and sonoporation was better in terms of viability (64.8±1.51% vs 53.7±1.53%) and transfection efficiency (2.73±0.21% vs 0.43±0.06%) for human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (primary cells). The electroporation was performed using a Gene Pulser® II Apparatus with voltage of 250 V, and the sonoporation was achieved using 2-MHz pulsed ultrasound exposure (ISPPA=80 W/cm2) assisted with encapsulated bubbles (Optison®).\",\"PeriodicalId\":87384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acoustics research letters online : ARLO\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"62-67\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2004-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"32\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acoustics research letters online : ARLO\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1652111\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acoustics research letters online : ARLO","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1652111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 32

摘要

对细胞悬浮液进行了实验研究,以比较细胞转染的效率。结果表明,电穿孔法对Jurkat淋巴细胞(非原代细胞)的存活率(65.8±2.3%比50.8±4.15%)和转染效率(15.83±3.5%比7.53±0.4%)优于声穿孔法,对人外周血单个核细胞(原代细胞)的存活率(64.8±1.51%比53.7±1.53%)和转染效率(2.73±0.21%比0.43±0.06%)优于声穿孔法。电穿孔使用电压为250 V的Gene Pulser®II仪器进行,超声穿孔使用2 mhz脉冲超声暴露(ISPPA=80 W/cm2)辅助封装气泡(Optison®)实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental comparison of sonoporation and electroporation in cell transfection applications
An experimental study has been performed for cell suspensions to compare efficiency of cell transfection. It was demonstrated that electroporation was superior to sonoporation in terms of viability (65.8±2.3% vs 50.8±4.15%) and transfection efficiency (15.83±3.5% vs 7.53±0.4%) for Jurkat lymphocytes (nonprimary cells), and sonoporation was better in terms of viability (64.8±1.51% vs 53.7±1.53%) and transfection efficiency (2.73±0.21% vs 0.43±0.06%) for human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (primary cells). The electroporation was performed using a Gene Pulser® II Apparatus with voltage of 250 V, and the sonoporation was achieved using 2-MHz pulsed ultrasound exposure (ISPPA=80 W/cm2) assisted with encapsulated bubbles (Optison®).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信