“要点”项目:物理治疗教学创新

F. Valera Garrido , F. Minaya Muñoz , M.A. Valera Garrido
{"title":"“要点”项目:物理治疗教学创新","authors":"F. Valera Garrido ,&nbsp;F. Minaya Muñoz ,&nbsp;M.A. Valera Garrido","doi":"10.1016/S1138-6045(08)76323-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Adaptation to the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) is going to involve a deep restructuring of university teaching regarding curriculum design, learning methodologies and assessment models (“Competences”). The aim of this present study is to evaluate and present the quantitative and qualitative results of a new learning methodology and assessment system based on active learning: the “Essentials” Program.</p></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><p>A cross-sectional, descriptive study based on the analysis of: a) results achieved by the students in the February, June and September exams from year 03-04 to year 05-06; b) the students’ opinion obtained from an anonymous self-reported questionnaire.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>a) A quantitative analysis (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->653): 69.5% passed the nuclear contents and 71.1 %of them passed the course. The results obtained with the “Essentials” Program are independent of the course type and course calendar (p &lt; 0.05). b) Qualitative analysis (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->51): 94.1% consider that the didactic methodology makes learning easier and helps them arrange and plan their studies; 80.4 % indicate that the assessment system is in better keeping with their individual conditions (they grade it 7.1 on a 10-point scale).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The “Essentials” Program makes the learning process easier. This means a high percentage of students who passed (over 70 %) and high satisfaction. The academic results obtained following this methodology does not depend on the kind of subject or the official examination time.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101113,"journal":{"name":"Revista Iberoamericana de Fisioterapia y Kinesiología","volume":"11 2","pages":"Pages 51-59"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1138-6045(08)76323-8","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Programa “Essentials”: innovación docente en fisioterapia\",\"authors\":\"F. Valera Garrido ,&nbsp;F. Minaya Muñoz ,&nbsp;M.A. Valera Garrido\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1138-6045(08)76323-8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Adaptation to the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) is going to involve a deep restructuring of university teaching regarding curriculum design, learning methodologies and assessment models (“Competences”). The aim of this present study is to evaluate and present the quantitative and qualitative results of a new learning methodology and assessment system based on active learning: the “Essentials” Program.</p></div><div><h3>Material and method</h3><p>A cross-sectional, descriptive study based on the analysis of: a) results achieved by the students in the February, June and September exams from year 03-04 to year 05-06; b) the students’ opinion obtained from an anonymous self-reported questionnaire.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>a) A quantitative analysis (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->653): 69.5% passed the nuclear contents and 71.1 %of them passed the course. The results obtained with the “Essentials” Program are independent of the course type and course calendar (p &lt; 0.05). b) Qualitative analysis (n<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->51): 94.1% consider that the didactic methodology makes learning easier and helps them arrange and plan their studies; 80.4 % indicate that the assessment system is in better keeping with their individual conditions (they grade it 7.1 on a 10-point scale).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The “Essentials” Program makes the learning process easier. This means a high percentage of students who passed (over 70 %) and high satisfaction. The academic results obtained following this methodology does not depend on the kind of subject or the official examination time.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101113,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Iberoamericana de Fisioterapia y Kinesiología\",\"volume\":\"11 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 51-59\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1138-6045(08)76323-8\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Iberoamericana de Fisioterapia y Kinesiología\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1138604508763238\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Iberoamericana de Fisioterapia y Kinesiología","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1138604508763238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

适应欧洲高等教育区(EHEA)将涉及大学教学在课程设计、学习方法和评估模型(“能力”)方面的深度重组。本研究的目的是评估和展示一种基于主动学习的新学习方法和评估系统的定量和定性结果:“必需品”计划。材料与方法基于以下分析的横断面描述性研究:a)学生在03-04至05-06学年2月、6月和9月考试中取得的成绩;结果A)定量分析(n = 653): 69.5%的学生核内容通过率,71.1%的学生课程通过率。使用“必需品”程序获得的结果与课程类型和课程日历无关(p <0.05)。b)定性分析(n = 51): 94.1%认为教学方法使学习更容易,并帮助他们安排和计划学习;80.4%的人表示,评估系统更符合他们的个人情况(他们在10分制中给7.1分)。“要领”计划使学习过程更容易。这意味着高百分比的学生通过(超过70%)和高满意度。按照这种方法获得的学术成绩不取决于科目的种类或正式考试的时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Programa “Essentials”: innovación docente en fisioterapia

Introduction

Adaptation to the European Higher Education Area (EHEA) is going to involve a deep restructuring of university teaching regarding curriculum design, learning methodologies and assessment models (“Competences”). The aim of this present study is to evaluate and present the quantitative and qualitative results of a new learning methodology and assessment system based on active learning: the “Essentials” Program.

Material and method

A cross-sectional, descriptive study based on the analysis of: a) results achieved by the students in the February, June and September exams from year 03-04 to year 05-06; b) the students’ opinion obtained from an anonymous self-reported questionnaire.

Results

a) A quantitative analysis (n = 653): 69.5% passed the nuclear contents and 71.1 %of them passed the course. The results obtained with the “Essentials” Program are independent of the course type and course calendar (p < 0.05). b) Qualitative analysis (n = 51): 94.1% consider that the didactic methodology makes learning easier and helps them arrange and plan their studies; 80.4 % indicate that the assessment system is in better keeping with their individual conditions (they grade it 7.1 on a 10-point scale).

Conclusions

The “Essentials” Program makes the learning process easier. This means a high percentage of students who passed (over 70 %) and high satisfaction. The academic results obtained following this methodology does not depend on the kind of subject or the official examination time.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信