老年人跌倒风险评估与反馈系统:从技术需求到社会技术需求

I. Jahnke, L. Phillips, Fatih Demir, C. Abbott, M. Skubic
{"title":"老年人跌倒风险评估与反馈系统:从技术需求到社会技术需求","authors":"I. Jahnke, L. Phillips, Fatih Demir, C. Abbott, M. Skubic","doi":"10.4018/IJSKD.2021040107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Falls are widespread among older adults causing serious injuries and threatening their quality of life. An approach to estimate fall risk, and to prevent falls, is the Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) test. The TUG test has established validity and reliability. However, as a clinical test, it is not accessible for personal use. To enhance its reach, the authors developed a prototype called Fall Risk Evaluation and Feedback System (FREFS). The prototype is a Kinect-based depth sensor system with interfaces that support older adults in completing the TUG test and receiving personalized test results. The personalized feedback feature is novel that existing prototypes do not include. This study's goal was to gain knowledge of the user experience of FREFS. This research applied methods of observation, interviews, and collected responses on the System Usability Scale (SUS). Results show participants perceived the system as usable, with SUS score of 84.3, but also revealed issues. First, users were unsure how to deal with the TUG tests results when the results showed high fall risk. Second, clearer instructions and reduction of information overload specifically for these age groups were needed. Third, a communication approach embedded into the system would be required (i.e., a link to a chatbot feature or a button to connect to a real person). Overall, the study demonstrated that such a prototype cannot be fully automated; it needs a sociotechnical system solution that includes human communication.","PeriodicalId":13656,"journal":{"name":"Int. J. Sociotechnology Knowl. Dev.","volume":"99 1","pages":"105-118"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Fall Risk Evaluation and Feedback System for Older Adults: From a Technical to a Sociotechnical Need\",\"authors\":\"I. Jahnke, L. Phillips, Fatih Demir, C. Abbott, M. Skubic\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/IJSKD.2021040107\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Falls are widespread among older adults causing serious injuries and threatening their quality of life. An approach to estimate fall risk, and to prevent falls, is the Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) test. The TUG test has established validity and reliability. However, as a clinical test, it is not accessible for personal use. To enhance its reach, the authors developed a prototype called Fall Risk Evaluation and Feedback System (FREFS). The prototype is a Kinect-based depth sensor system with interfaces that support older adults in completing the TUG test and receiving personalized test results. The personalized feedback feature is novel that existing prototypes do not include. This study's goal was to gain knowledge of the user experience of FREFS. This research applied methods of observation, interviews, and collected responses on the System Usability Scale (SUS). Results show participants perceived the system as usable, with SUS score of 84.3, but also revealed issues. First, users were unsure how to deal with the TUG tests results when the results showed high fall risk. Second, clearer instructions and reduction of information overload specifically for these age groups were needed. Third, a communication approach embedded into the system would be required (i.e., a link to a chatbot feature or a button to connect to a real person). Overall, the study demonstrated that such a prototype cannot be fully automated; it needs a sociotechnical system solution that includes human communication.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13656,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Int. J. Sociotechnology Knowl. Dev.\",\"volume\":\"99 1\",\"pages\":\"105-118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Int. J. Sociotechnology Knowl. Dev.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSKD.2021040107\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Int. J. Sociotechnology Knowl. Dev.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJSKD.2021040107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

跌倒在老年人中很普遍,造成严重伤害并威胁到他们的生活质量。一种评估跌倒风险并防止跌倒的方法是“计时起跑”(TUG)测试。TUG测试具有一定的效度和信度。然而,作为一种临床试验,它不能供个人使用。为了扩大它的覆盖范围,作者开发了一个名为跌倒风险评估和反馈系统(FREFS)的原型。原型是一个基于kinect的深度传感器系统,其接口支持老年人完成TUG测试并接收个性化测试结果。个性化反馈功能是新颖的,现有的原型不包括。本研究的目的是了解FREFS的用户体验。本研究采用了观察、访谈和收集系统可用性量表(SUS)反馈的方法。结果显示,参与者认为系统是可用的,SUS得分为84.3,但也暴露了问题。首先,当结果显示高坠落风险时,用户不确定如何处理TUG测试结果。其次,需要更明确的指示和减少专门针对这些年龄组的信息过载。第三,需要将通信方法嵌入到系统中(例如,链接到聊天机器人功能或连接到真人的按钮)。总的来说,研究表明,这样的原型不能完全自动化;它需要一个包含人类交流的社会技术系统解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Fall Risk Evaluation and Feedback System for Older Adults: From a Technical to a Sociotechnical Need
Falls are widespread among older adults causing serious injuries and threatening their quality of life. An approach to estimate fall risk, and to prevent falls, is the Timed-Up-and-Go (TUG) test. The TUG test has established validity and reliability. However, as a clinical test, it is not accessible for personal use. To enhance its reach, the authors developed a prototype called Fall Risk Evaluation and Feedback System (FREFS). The prototype is a Kinect-based depth sensor system with interfaces that support older adults in completing the TUG test and receiving personalized test results. The personalized feedback feature is novel that existing prototypes do not include. This study's goal was to gain knowledge of the user experience of FREFS. This research applied methods of observation, interviews, and collected responses on the System Usability Scale (SUS). Results show participants perceived the system as usable, with SUS score of 84.3, but also revealed issues. First, users were unsure how to deal with the TUG tests results when the results showed high fall risk. Second, clearer instructions and reduction of information overload specifically for these age groups were needed. Third, a communication approach embedded into the system would be required (i.e., a link to a chatbot feature or a button to connect to a real person). Overall, the study demonstrated that such a prototype cannot be fully automated; it needs a sociotechnical system solution that includes human communication.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信