伯克《灾害研究与应急管理实践中军事模式的挑战谬误》一文述评

Abdulhadi A. Al Ruwaithi, B. Aguirre
{"title":"伯克《灾害研究与应急管理实践中军事模式的挑战谬误》一文述评","authors":"Abdulhadi A. Al Ruwaithi, B. Aguirre","doi":"10.1177/028072701903700202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"While the debate continues between the emergency managers and disaster research community on the applicability of the Incident Command System (ICS), Burke (2018) introduces the modern military command and control system (modern military C2) as a practical solution that satisfies the disaster researchers’ recommendations. Burke's (2018) argument concludes that both practitioners and researchers overlook the essences of the military command and control system, which can be considered an analogous model to the problem-solving approach. This commentary paper is a critical review of the Burke's (2018) perspective. It highlights how and why modern military C2 differs from the problem-solving approach. There is more similarity between modern military C2 and ICS than between them and the problem-solving approach due to their structures and the flexibility level adopted therein.","PeriodicalId":84928,"journal":{"name":"International journal of mass emergencies and disasters","volume":"32 1","pages":"125 - 129"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Commentary on Burke's Article on ‘Challenging Fallacies of the Military Model’ in the Disaster Research and Emergency Management Practice\",\"authors\":\"Abdulhadi A. Al Ruwaithi, B. Aguirre\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/028072701903700202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"While the debate continues between the emergency managers and disaster research community on the applicability of the Incident Command System (ICS), Burke (2018) introduces the modern military command and control system (modern military C2) as a practical solution that satisfies the disaster researchers’ recommendations. Burke's (2018) argument concludes that both practitioners and researchers overlook the essences of the military command and control system, which can be considered an analogous model to the problem-solving approach. This commentary paper is a critical review of the Burke's (2018) perspective. It highlights how and why modern military C2 differs from the problem-solving approach. There is more similarity between modern military C2 and ICS than between them and the problem-solving approach due to their structures and the flexibility level adopted therein.\",\"PeriodicalId\":84928,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of mass emergencies and disasters\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"125 - 129\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of mass emergencies and disasters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/028072701903700202\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of mass emergencies and disasters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/028072701903700202","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

虽然应急管理人员和灾害研究界之间关于事件指挥系统(ICS)适用性的争论仍在继续,但Burke(2018)介绍了现代军事指挥控制系统(现代军事C2)作为满足灾害研究人员建议的实用解决方案。Burke(2018)的论点得出结论,实践者和研究人员都忽视了军事指挥和控制系统的本质,这可以被视为与问题解决方法类似的模型。这篇评论论文是对伯克(2018)观点的批判性回顾。它强调了现代军事C2与解决问题的方法的不同之处。现代军事C2与ICS在结构和柔性水平上的相似性大于其在解决问题方法上的相似性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Commentary on Burke's Article on ‘Challenging Fallacies of the Military Model’ in the Disaster Research and Emergency Management Practice
While the debate continues between the emergency managers and disaster research community on the applicability of the Incident Command System (ICS), Burke (2018) introduces the modern military command and control system (modern military C2) as a practical solution that satisfies the disaster researchers’ recommendations. Burke's (2018) argument concludes that both practitioners and researchers overlook the essences of the military command and control system, which can be considered an analogous model to the problem-solving approach. This commentary paper is a critical review of the Burke's (2018) perspective. It highlights how and why modern military C2 differs from the problem-solving approach. There is more similarity between modern military C2 and ICS than between them and the problem-solving approach due to their structures and the flexibility level adopted therein.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信