N. Watts, J. Cauley, R. Jackson, A. LaCroix, Cora E. Lewis, J. Manson, J. Neuner, L. Phillips, M. Stefanick, J. Wactawski‐Wende, C. Crandall
{"title":"停止激素治疗后骨折发生率不增加:来自妇女健康倡议的结果","authors":"N. Watts, J. Cauley, R. Jackson, A. LaCroix, Cora E. Lewis, J. Manson, J. Neuner, L. Phillips, M. Stefanick, J. Wactawski‐Wende, C. Crandall","doi":"10.1210/jc.2016-3270","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context\nThe Women's Health Initiative (WHI) hormone therapy (HT) trials showed protection against hip and total fractures, but a later observational report suggested loss of benefit and a rebound increased risk after cessation of HT.\n\n\nObjective\nThe purpose of this study was to examine fractures after discontinuation of HT.\n\n\nDesign and Setting\nTwo placebo-controlled randomized trials served as the study setting.\n\n\nPatients\nStudy patients included WHI participants (N = 15,187) who continued active HT or placebo through the intervention period and who did not take HT in the postintervention period.\n\n\nInterventions\nTrial interventions included conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in naturally menopausal women and CEE alone in women with prior hysterectomy.\n\n\nMain Outcome Measures\nTotal fractures and hip fractures through 5 years after discontinuation of HT were recorded.\n\n\nResults\nHip fractures were infrequent (∼2.5 per 1000 person-years); this finding was similar between trials and in former HT and placebo groups. There was no difference in total fractures in the CEE + MPA trial for former HT vs former placebo users (28.9 per 1000 person-years and 29.9 per 1000 person-years, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.09; P = 0.63); however, in the CEE-alone trial, total fractures were higher in former placebo users (36.9 per 1000 person-years) compared with the former active group (31.1 per 1000 person-years), a finding that was suggestive of a residual benefit of CEE against total fractures (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.98; P = 0.03).\n\n\nConclusions\nWe found no evidence for increased fracture risk, either sustained or transient, for former HT users compared with former placebo users after stopping HT. There was residual benefit for total fractures in former HT users from the CEE-alone study.","PeriodicalId":22632,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","volume":"31 1","pages":"302–308"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"36","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No Increase in Fractures After Stopping Hormone Therapy: Results From the Women’s Health Initiative\",\"authors\":\"N. Watts, J. Cauley, R. Jackson, A. LaCroix, Cora E. Lewis, J. Manson, J. Neuner, L. Phillips, M. Stefanick, J. Wactawski‐Wende, C. Crandall\",\"doi\":\"10.1210/jc.2016-3270\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Context\\nThe Women's Health Initiative (WHI) hormone therapy (HT) trials showed protection against hip and total fractures, but a later observational report suggested loss of benefit and a rebound increased risk after cessation of HT.\\n\\n\\nObjective\\nThe purpose of this study was to examine fractures after discontinuation of HT.\\n\\n\\nDesign and Setting\\nTwo placebo-controlled randomized trials served as the study setting.\\n\\n\\nPatients\\nStudy patients included WHI participants (N = 15,187) who continued active HT or placebo through the intervention period and who did not take HT in the postintervention period.\\n\\n\\nInterventions\\nTrial interventions included conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in naturally menopausal women and CEE alone in women with prior hysterectomy.\\n\\n\\nMain Outcome Measures\\nTotal fractures and hip fractures through 5 years after discontinuation of HT were recorded.\\n\\n\\nResults\\nHip fractures were infrequent (∼2.5 per 1000 person-years); this finding was similar between trials and in former HT and placebo groups. There was no difference in total fractures in the CEE + MPA trial for former HT vs former placebo users (28.9 per 1000 person-years and 29.9 per 1000 person-years, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.09; P = 0.63); however, in the CEE-alone trial, total fractures were higher in former placebo users (36.9 per 1000 person-years) compared with the former active group (31.1 per 1000 person-years), a finding that was suggestive of a residual benefit of CEE against total fractures (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.98; P = 0.03).\\n\\n\\nConclusions\\nWe found no evidence for increased fracture risk, either sustained or transient, for former HT users compared with former placebo users after stopping HT. There was residual benefit for total fractures in former HT users from the CEE-alone study.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22632,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"302–308\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"36\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-3270\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2016-3270","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
No Increase in Fractures After Stopping Hormone Therapy: Results From the Women’s Health Initiative
Context
The Women's Health Initiative (WHI) hormone therapy (HT) trials showed protection against hip and total fractures, but a later observational report suggested loss of benefit and a rebound increased risk after cessation of HT.
Objective
The purpose of this study was to examine fractures after discontinuation of HT.
Design and Setting
Two placebo-controlled randomized trials served as the study setting.
Patients
Study patients included WHI participants (N = 15,187) who continued active HT or placebo through the intervention period and who did not take HT in the postintervention period.
Interventions
Trial interventions included conjugated equine estrogen (CEE) plus medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) in naturally menopausal women and CEE alone in women with prior hysterectomy.
Main Outcome Measures
Total fractures and hip fractures through 5 years after discontinuation of HT were recorded.
Results
Hip fractures were infrequent (∼2.5 per 1000 person-years); this finding was similar between trials and in former HT and placebo groups. There was no difference in total fractures in the CEE + MPA trial for former HT vs former placebo users (28.9 per 1000 person-years and 29.9 per 1000 person-years, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.97; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.87 to 1.09; P = 0.63); however, in the CEE-alone trial, total fractures were higher in former placebo users (36.9 per 1000 person-years) compared with the former active group (31.1 per 1000 person-years), a finding that was suggestive of a residual benefit of CEE against total fractures (HR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.73 to 0.98; P = 0.03).
Conclusions
We found no evidence for increased fracture risk, either sustained or transient, for former HT users compared with former placebo users after stopping HT. There was residual benefit for total fractures in former HT users from the CEE-alone study.