性别与美国学者詹姆斯

IF 0.6 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
Small Axe Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.1215/07990537-9384374
H. Neptune
{"title":"性别与美国学者詹姆斯","authors":"H. Neptune","doi":"10.1215/07990537-9384374","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This review essay asserts that Aaron Kamugisha's 2019 Beyond Coloniality: Citizenship and Freedom in the Caribbean Intellectual Tradition, for all its brilliance, does not do justice to the thought of C. L. R. James, especially in relation to gender. After claiming that Kamugisha mostly misses the emancipatory and at times radical aspects of James's feminist thinking, which was developed most fully during his years in the United States (1938–52), the author allows that the omission appears to be not deliberate but an unintended consequence of Kamugisha's faithful following of the dominant North Atlantic interpretation of the \"American James.\" In particular, the author sees Kamugisha as seeming to accept without question the hegemonic Americanist assumption that James took a romantic excursion in the United States, and thus Beyond Coloniality neglects the deeply gendered analysis at the heart of James's 1950 manuscript that eventually found publication in 1993 as American Civilization. Although James certainly never got out of \"gender jail\" in his lifetime, American Civilization betrayed his hopeful vision of escape. This essay proposes to Kamugisha that a careful and independent reading of this text could have revealed James as a far more sophisticated failure than the virtually helpless figure drawn in Beyond Coloniality.","PeriodicalId":46163,"journal":{"name":"Small Axe","volume":"23 2 1","pages":"171 - 181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender and the Americanist James\",\"authors\":\"H. Neptune\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/07990537-9384374\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:This review essay asserts that Aaron Kamugisha's 2019 Beyond Coloniality: Citizenship and Freedom in the Caribbean Intellectual Tradition, for all its brilliance, does not do justice to the thought of C. L. R. James, especially in relation to gender. After claiming that Kamugisha mostly misses the emancipatory and at times radical aspects of James's feminist thinking, which was developed most fully during his years in the United States (1938–52), the author allows that the omission appears to be not deliberate but an unintended consequence of Kamugisha's faithful following of the dominant North Atlantic interpretation of the \\\"American James.\\\" In particular, the author sees Kamugisha as seeming to accept without question the hegemonic Americanist assumption that James took a romantic excursion in the United States, and thus Beyond Coloniality neglects the deeply gendered analysis at the heart of James's 1950 manuscript that eventually found publication in 1993 as American Civilization. Although James certainly never got out of \\\"gender jail\\\" in his lifetime, American Civilization betrayed his hopeful vision of escape. This essay proposes to Kamugisha that a careful and independent reading of this text could have revealed James as a far more sophisticated failure than the virtually helpless figure drawn in Beyond Coloniality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46163,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Small Axe\",\"volume\":\"23 2 1\",\"pages\":\"171 - 181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Small Axe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/07990537-9384374\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Small Axe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/07990537-9384374","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:本文认为,Aaron Kamugisha 2019年出版的《超越殖民:加勒比知识传统中的公民身份与自由》虽然非常出色,但并没有充分体现c.l.r.詹姆斯的思想,尤其是在性别问题上。在声称Kamugisha主要忽略了詹姆斯女权主义思想的解放和有时激进的方面之后,作者承认这种遗漏似乎不是故意的,而是Kamugisha忠实地追随北大西洋对“美国詹姆斯”的主导解释的意外后果。詹姆斯的女权主义思想在他在美国的那些年(1938-52)发展得最充分。特别是,作者认为Kamugisha似乎毫无疑问地接受了美国霸权主义的假设,即詹姆斯在美国进行了一次浪漫的旅行,因此《超越殖民》忽略了詹姆斯1950年手稿中深刻的性别分析,最终于1993年出版,书名为《美国文明》。虽然詹姆斯一生中从未走出“性别监狱”,但《美国文明》辜负了他对逃脱的希望。这篇文章向Kamugisha提出,仔细而独立地阅读这篇文章,可能会发现詹姆斯是一个比《超越殖民》中所描绘的实际上无助的人物更复杂的失败者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gender and the Americanist James
Abstract:This review essay asserts that Aaron Kamugisha's 2019 Beyond Coloniality: Citizenship and Freedom in the Caribbean Intellectual Tradition, for all its brilliance, does not do justice to the thought of C. L. R. James, especially in relation to gender. After claiming that Kamugisha mostly misses the emancipatory and at times radical aspects of James's feminist thinking, which was developed most fully during his years in the United States (1938–52), the author allows that the omission appears to be not deliberate but an unintended consequence of Kamugisha's faithful following of the dominant North Atlantic interpretation of the "American James." In particular, the author sees Kamugisha as seeming to accept without question the hegemonic Americanist assumption that James took a romantic excursion in the United States, and thus Beyond Coloniality neglects the deeply gendered analysis at the heart of James's 1950 manuscript that eventually found publication in 1993 as American Civilization. Although James certainly never got out of "gender jail" in his lifetime, American Civilization betrayed his hopeful vision of escape. This essay proposes to Kamugisha that a careful and independent reading of this text could have revealed James as a far more sophisticated failure than the virtually helpless figure drawn in Beyond Coloniality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Small Axe
Small Axe HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
34
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信