印度南部农村卫生培训中心宫颈癌筛查项目受益人的随访损失——一项解释性混合方法研究

Subalakshmi Subramaniyan, R. Sindhuri, Reena Mohan, K. Ganapathy, Jayasree Manivasakan
{"title":"印度南部农村卫生培训中心宫颈癌筛查项目受益人的随访损失——一项解释性混合方法研究","authors":"Subalakshmi Subramaniyan, R. Sindhuri, Reena Mohan, K. Ganapathy, Jayasree Manivasakan","doi":"10.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_97_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In India, routine Pap smear screening is an ongoing process for the detection of cervical cancer, but the follow-up component remains unaddressed. The objectives of the present study were to find out the proportion of abnormal Pap smear results among women aged 30 years screened through the cervical cancer screening program at RHTC, their follow-up status, and explore the reasons and solutions for loss to follow-up (LTFU). Methodology: An explanatory mixed-method study (quantitative: A record-based cohort study followed by qualitative: Five in-depth interviews with loss to follow-up patients and 14 key informant interviews with stakeholders who were purposively selected to identify barriers and possible solutions for LTFU using an interview guide) was conducted in RHTC over 3 months. Ethical principles were adhered to. Results: The results showed that 307 of the 1328 women screened had abnormal Pap smear results. Of the 31 women with precancerous lesions, 26 (83.9%) were on regular follow-ups, and 5 (16.1%) were on irregular follow-ups. Manual content analysis showed five broad categories as barriers to LTFU, namely: (1) general awareness and practical issues; (2) family-related issues; (3) economic issues; (4) cultural issues; and (5) healthcare-associated issues. Community-level awareness generation for capacity building through health education constantly; displaying creative health information models (information, education, and communication); a positive deviance approach; a family and partner-centered approach; the formation of support groups; proactive intervention; and an incentive-based follow-up approach were possible solutions to mitigate the rate of LTFU. Conclusion: Improper knowledge, socio-cultural myths, and a lack of support from partners and family members were the main barriers identified for LTFU. Hence, to strengthen the follow-up component after the initial screening test, periodical sensitization and initiating an incentive-based follow-up approach should be recommended.","PeriodicalId":32638,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine","volume":"22 1","pages":"53 - 60"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Loss to follow-up of cervical cancer screening program beneficiaries at Rural Health Training Center in South India – An explanatory mixed method study\",\"authors\":\"Subalakshmi Subramaniyan, R. Sindhuri, Reena Mohan, K. Ganapathy, Jayasree Manivasakan\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_97_22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: In India, routine Pap smear screening is an ongoing process for the detection of cervical cancer, but the follow-up component remains unaddressed. The objectives of the present study were to find out the proportion of abnormal Pap smear results among women aged 30 years screened through the cervical cancer screening program at RHTC, their follow-up status, and explore the reasons and solutions for loss to follow-up (LTFU). Methodology: An explanatory mixed-method study (quantitative: A record-based cohort study followed by qualitative: Five in-depth interviews with loss to follow-up patients and 14 key informant interviews with stakeholders who were purposively selected to identify barriers and possible solutions for LTFU using an interview guide) was conducted in RHTC over 3 months. Ethical principles were adhered to. Results: The results showed that 307 of the 1328 women screened had abnormal Pap smear results. Of the 31 women with precancerous lesions, 26 (83.9%) were on regular follow-ups, and 5 (16.1%) were on irregular follow-ups. Manual content analysis showed five broad categories as barriers to LTFU, namely: (1) general awareness and practical issues; (2) family-related issues; (3) economic issues; (4) cultural issues; and (5) healthcare-associated issues. Community-level awareness generation for capacity building through health education constantly; displaying creative health information models (information, education, and communication); a positive deviance approach; a family and partner-centered approach; the formation of support groups; proactive intervention; and an incentive-based follow-up approach were possible solutions to mitigate the rate of LTFU. Conclusion: Improper knowledge, socio-cultural myths, and a lack of support from partners and family members were the main barriers identified for LTFU. Hence, to strengthen the follow-up component after the initial screening test, periodical sensitization and initiating an incentive-based follow-up approach should be recommended.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32638,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"53 - 60\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_97_22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Current Research in Scientific Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jcrsm.jcrsm_97_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在印度,常规子宫颈抹片检查是检测宫颈癌的一个持续过程,但后续部分仍未得到解决。本研究的目的是了解RHTC宫颈癌筛查项目筛查的30岁女性子宫颈抹片检查结果异常的比例及其随访情况,并探讨失访(LTFU)的原因及解决方法。方法学:在RHTC进行了为期3个月的解释性混合方法研究(定量:基于记录的队列研究,随后是定性研究:对随访患者进行了5次深入访谈,并与有目的选择的利益相关者进行了14次关键信息提供者访谈,以确定LTFU的障碍和可能的解决方案,使用访谈指南)。道德原则得到遵守。结果:1328名接受筛查的妇女中,有307人子宫颈抹片检查结果异常。31例癌前病变妇女中,26例(83.9%)定期随访,5例(16.1%)不定期随访。手册内容分析显示了LTFU的五大障碍,即:(1)一般意识和实际问题;(二)家庭事务;(3)经济问题;(4)文化问题;(5)医疗保健相关问题。通过不断进行健康教育,提高社区一级的认识,促进能力建设;展示创新的健康信息模式(信息、教育和传播);积极偏差方法;以家庭和伙伴为中心的方针;成立支援小组;积极的干预;和以激励为基础的随访方法是降低LTFU发生率的可能解决方案。结论:不正确的知识、社会文化神话、缺乏伴侣和家庭成员的支持是LTFU的主要障碍。因此,为了加强初步筛选试验后的随访内容,应建议定期增敏和启动基于奖励的随访方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Loss to follow-up of cervical cancer screening program beneficiaries at Rural Health Training Center in South India – An explanatory mixed method study
Background: In India, routine Pap smear screening is an ongoing process for the detection of cervical cancer, but the follow-up component remains unaddressed. The objectives of the present study were to find out the proportion of abnormal Pap smear results among women aged 30 years screened through the cervical cancer screening program at RHTC, their follow-up status, and explore the reasons and solutions for loss to follow-up (LTFU). Methodology: An explanatory mixed-method study (quantitative: A record-based cohort study followed by qualitative: Five in-depth interviews with loss to follow-up patients and 14 key informant interviews with stakeholders who were purposively selected to identify barriers and possible solutions for LTFU using an interview guide) was conducted in RHTC over 3 months. Ethical principles were adhered to. Results: The results showed that 307 of the 1328 women screened had abnormal Pap smear results. Of the 31 women with precancerous lesions, 26 (83.9%) were on regular follow-ups, and 5 (16.1%) were on irregular follow-ups. Manual content analysis showed five broad categories as barriers to LTFU, namely: (1) general awareness and practical issues; (2) family-related issues; (3) economic issues; (4) cultural issues; and (5) healthcare-associated issues. Community-level awareness generation for capacity building through health education constantly; displaying creative health information models (information, education, and communication); a positive deviance approach; a family and partner-centered approach; the formation of support groups; proactive intervention; and an incentive-based follow-up approach were possible solutions to mitigate the rate of LTFU. Conclusion: Improper knowledge, socio-cultural myths, and a lack of support from partners and family members were the main barriers identified for LTFU. Hence, to strengthen the follow-up component after the initial screening test, periodical sensitization and initiating an incentive-based follow-up approach should be recommended.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信