语音和非语音在不同刺激启动时的二元和一元相互作用

R. Porter, P. Mirabile
{"title":"语音和非语音在不同刺激启动时的二元和一元相互作用","authors":"R. Porter, P. Mirabile","doi":"10.1121/1.1995283","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Subjects’ identification of stop-vowel “targets” was obtained under monotic and dichotic, forward and backward, masking conditions. Masks, or “challenges,” were another stop-vowel or one of three nonspeech sounds similar to parts of a stop-vowel. Backward masking was greater than forward in dichotic conditions. Forward masking predominated monotically. Relative degree of masking for different challenges suggested that dichotic effects were predicated on interference with processing of a complex temporal array of auditory “features” of the targets, prior to phonetic decoding but subsequent to basic auditory analysis. Monotic effects seemed best interpreted as dependent on relative spectrum levels of nearly simultaneous portions of the two signals.","PeriodicalId":19838,"journal":{"name":"Perception & Psychophysics","volume":"54 1","pages":"408-412"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1975-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dichotic and monotic interactions between speech and nonspeech sounds at different stimulus onset asynchronies\",\"authors\":\"R. Porter, P. Mirabile\",\"doi\":\"10.1121/1.1995283\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Subjects’ identification of stop-vowel “targets” was obtained under monotic and dichotic, forward and backward, masking conditions. Masks, or “challenges,” were another stop-vowel or one of three nonspeech sounds similar to parts of a stop-vowel. Backward masking was greater than forward in dichotic conditions. Forward masking predominated monotically. Relative degree of masking for different challenges suggested that dichotic effects were predicated on interference with processing of a complex temporal array of auditory “features” of the targets, prior to phonetic decoding but subsequent to basic auditory analysis. Monotic effects seemed best interpreted as dependent on relative spectrum levels of nearly simultaneous portions of the two signals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perception & Psychophysics\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"408-412\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1975-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perception & Psychophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1995283\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perception & Psychophysics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1121/1.1995283","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

被试在单一和双重、向前和向后、掩蔽条件下对顿音“目标”的识别。mask或“challenges”是另一个顿音,或者是三个与顿音部分相似的非言语音之一。在二元条件下,反向掩蔽大于正向掩蔽。前向掩蔽占主导地位。不同挑战的相对掩蔽程度表明,在语音解码之前,在基本听觉分析之后,对目标的复杂听觉“特征”的处理受到干扰,从而预测了二分效应。单调效应似乎最好的解释是依赖于两个信号几乎同时部分的相对频谱水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Dichotic and monotic interactions between speech and nonspeech sounds at different stimulus onset asynchronies
Subjects’ identification of stop-vowel “targets” was obtained under monotic and dichotic, forward and backward, masking conditions. Masks, or “challenges,” were another stop-vowel or one of three nonspeech sounds similar to parts of a stop-vowel. Backward masking was greater than forward in dichotic conditions. Forward masking predominated monotically. Relative degree of masking for different challenges suggested that dichotic effects were predicated on interference with processing of a complex temporal array of auditory “features” of the targets, prior to phonetic decoding but subsequent to basic auditory analysis. Monotic effects seemed best interpreted as dependent on relative spectrum levels of nearly simultaneous portions of the two signals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信