{"title":"基于线性随机效应模型的所有M个未来观测值的预测区间","authors":"M. Menssen, F. Schaarschmidt","doi":"10.1111/stan.12260","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In many pharmaceutical and biomedical applications such as assay validation, assessment of historical control data, or the detection of anti‐drug antibodies, the calculation and interpretation of prediction intervals (PI) is of interest. The present study provides two novel methods for the calculation of prediction intervals based on linear random effects models and restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimation. Unlike other REML‐based PI found in the literature, both intervals reflect the uncertainty related with the estimation of the prediction variance. The first PI is based on Satterthwaite approximation. For the other PI, a bootstrap calibration approach that we will call quantile‐calibration was used. Due to the calibration process this PI can be easily computed for more than one future observation and based on balanced and unbalanced data as well. In order to compare the coverage probabilities of the proposed PI with those of four intervals found in the literature, Monte Carlo simulations were run for two relatively complex random effects models and a broad range of parameter settings. The quantile‐calibrated PI was implemented in the statistical software R and is available in the predint package.","PeriodicalId":51178,"journal":{"name":"Statistica Neerlandica","volume":"66 1","pages":"283 - 308"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Prediction intervals for all of M future observations based on linear random effects models\",\"authors\":\"M. Menssen, F. Schaarschmidt\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/stan.12260\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In many pharmaceutical and biomedical applications such as assay validation, assessment of historical control data, or the detection of anti‐drug antibodies, the calculation and interpretation of prediction intervals (PI) is of interest. The present study provides two novel methods for the calculation of prediction intervals based on linear random effects models and restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimation. Unlike other REML‐based PI found in the literature, both intervals reflect the uncertainty related with the estimation of the prediction variance. The first PI is based on Satterthwaite approximation. For the other PI, a bootstrap calibration approach that we will call quantile‐calibration was used. Due to the calibration process this PI can be easily computed for more than one future observation and based on balanced and unbalanced data as well. In order to compare the coverage probabilities of the proposed PI with those of four intervals found in the literature, Monte Carlo simulations were run for two relatively complex random effects models and a broad range of parameter settings. The quantile‐calibrated PI was implemented in the statistical software R and is available in the predint package.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51178,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Statistica Neerlandica\",\"volume\":\"66 1\",\"pages\":\"283 - 308\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Statistica Neerlandica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/stan.12260\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistica Neerlandica","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/stan.12260","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"STATISTICS & PROBABILITY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Prediction intervals for all of M future observations based on linear random effects models
In many pharmaceutical and biomedical applications such as assay validation, assessment of historical control data, or the detection of anti‐drug antibodies, the calculation and interpretation of prediction intervals (PI) is of interest. The present study provides two novel methods for the calculation of prediction intervals based on linear random effects models and restricted maximum likelihood (REML) estimation. Unlike other REML‐based PI found in the literature, both intervals reflect the uncertainty related with the estimation of the prediction variance. The first PI is based on Satterthwaite approximation. For the other PI, a bootstrap calibration approach that we will call quantile‐calibration was used. Due to the calibration process this PI can be easily computed for more than one future observation and based on balanced and unbalanced data as well. In order to compare the coverage probabilities of the proposed PI with those of four intervals found in the literature, Monte Carlo simulations were run for two relatively complex random effects models and a broad range of parameter settings. The quantile‐calibrated PI was implemented in the statistical software R and is available in the predint package.
期刊介绍:
Statistica Neerlandica has been the journal of the Netherlands Society for Statistics and Operations Research since 1946. It covers all areas of statistics, from theoretical to applied, with a special emphasis on mathematical statistics, statistics for the behavioural sciences and biostatistics. This wide scope is reflected by the expertise of the journal’s editors representing these areas. The diverse editorial board is committed to a fast and fair reviewing process, and will judge submissions on quality, correctness, relevance and originality. Statistica Neerlandica encourages transparency and reproducibility, and offers online resources to make data, code, simulation results and other additional materials publicly available.