软件需求工程过程改进的系统映射研究

Silvia Almeida, A. Dávila
{"title":"软件需求工程过程改进的系统映射研究","authors":"Silvia Almeida, A. Dávila","doi":"10.15514/ispras-2023-35(1)-10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Software analysis is the process carried out to obtain requirements that reflects the needs of a client's stakeholders and that allows the construction of a software product that meets their expectations. However, it is also known as a process where many defects are injected. In this context, although process improvement has contributed to the software industry, in the case of software requirements it needs to be studied to determine the improvements obtained and established models. In the literature reviewed, a similar mapping study with 4 research question was identified and used as a reference. The objective of this work is to structure the available literature on process improvement in the software requirements engineering (SRE) domain to identify the improvement phases, paradigms, principles, and established models. For this purpose, a systematic mapping study (SMS) was carried out in the most recognized digital databases. The mapping carried out recovered a total of 1,495 studies, and after the process, 86 primary studies were obtained. In this SMS had established and answered 13 research questions. The different models that are applied throughout the software requirements engineering process were identified, and accepted studies were classified and findings on SRE process improvement were collected. The most used models are CMMI, Requirements Engineering Good Practice Guide (REGPG), and ISO/IEC 15504. Also, 62% of accepted studies are of the proposal and evaluation type; that is, they propose a framework and study the implementation of a proposal in one or more case studies respectively. On the other hand, it was found that most of the studies focused on the process improvement analysis phase. Likewise, in contrast with a previous study, proposal and validation type of studies increased in 9 papers each one from 2014 to date. This shows the interest of the scientific community in this domain.","PeriodicalId":33459,"journal":{"name":"Trudy Instituta sistemnogo programmirovaniia RAN","volume":"34 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Systematic Mapping Study on Process Improvement in Software Requirements Engineering\",\"authors\":\"Silvia Almeida, A. Dávila\",\"doi\":\"10.15514/ispras-2023-35(1)-10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Software analysis is the process carried out to obtain requirements that reflects the needs of a client's stakeholders and that allows the construction of a software product that meets their expectations. However, it is also known as a process where many defects are injected. In this context, although process improvement has contributed to the software industry, in the case of software requirements it needs to be studied to determine the improvements obtained and established models. In the literature reviewed, a similar mapping study with 4 research question was identified and used as a reference. The objective of this work is to structure the available literature on process improvement in the software requirements engineering (SRE) domain to identify the improvement phases, paradigms, principles, and established models. For this purpose, a systematic mapping study (SMS) was carried out in the most recognized digital databases. The mapping carried out recovered a total of 1,495 studies, and after the process, 86 primary studies were obtained. In this SMS had established and answered 13 research questions. The different models that are applied throughout the software requirements engineering process were identified, and accepted studies were classified and findings on SRE process improvement were collected. The most used models are CMMI, Requirements Engineering Good Practice Guide (REGPG), and ISO/IEC 15504. Also, 62% of accepted studies are of the proposal and evaluation type; that is, they propose a framework and study the implementation of a proposal in one or more case studies respectively. On the other hand, it was found that most of the studies focused on the process improvement analysis phase. Likewise, in contrast with a previous study, proposal and validation type of studies increased in 9 papers each one from 2014 to date. This shows the interest of the scientific community in this domain.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33459,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Trudy Instituta sistemnogo programmirovaniia RAN\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Trudy Instituta sistemnogo programmirovaniia RAN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15514/ispras-2023-35(1)-10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trudy Instituta sistemnogo programmirovaniia RAN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15514/ispras-2023-35(1)-10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

软件分析是为了获得反映客户涉众需求的需求,并允许构建满足他们期望的软件产品而执行的过程。然而,它也被认为是一个注入许多缺陷的过程。在这种情况下,尽管过程改进对软件行业有所贡献,但在软件需求的情况下,需要对其进行研究,以确定获得的改进和建立的模型。在文献综述中,我们发现了一个类似的有4个研究问题的测绘研究,并作为参考。这项工作的目标是构建软件需求工程(SRE)领域中关于过程改进的可用文献,以确定改进阶段、范例、原则和已建立的模型。为此目的,在最公认的数字数据库中进行了系统的制图研究。测绘工作共恢复了1495项研究,在此过程之后,获得了86项主要研究。在此SMS建立并回答了13个研究问题。在整个软件需求工程过程中应用的不同模型被确定,被接受的研究被分类,并且收集了关于SRE过程改进的发现。最常用的模型是CMMI、需求工程良好实践指南(REGPG)和ISO/IEC 15504。此外,62%的被接受的研究是提案和评估类型;也就是说,他们分别在一个或多个案例研究中提出框架并研究建议的实现。另一方面,发现大多数研究集中在过程改进分析阶段。同样,与之前的一项研究相比,2014年至今,提案和验证类型的研究各增加了9篇。这显示了科学界对这一领域的兴趣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Systematic Mapping Study on Process Improvement in Software Requirements Engineering
Software analysis is the process carried out to obtain requirements that reflects the needs of a client's stakeholders and that allows the construction of a software product that meets their expectations. However, it is also known as a process where many defects are injected. In this context, although process improvement has contributed to the software industry, in the case of software requirements it needs to be studied to determine the improvements obtained and established models. In the literature reviewed, a similar mapping study with 4 research question was identified and used as a reference. The objective of this work is to structure the available literature on process improvement in the software requirements engineering (SRE) domain to identify the improvement phases, paradigms, principles, and established models. For this purpose, a systematic mapping study (SMS) was carried out in the most recognized digital databases. The mapping carried out recovered a total of 1,495 studies, and after the process, 86 primary studies were obtained. In this SMS had established and answered 13 research questions. The different models that are applied throughout the software requirements engineering process were identified, and accepted studies were classified and findings on SRE process improvement were collected. The most used models are CMMI, Requirements Engineering Good Practice Guide (REGPG), and ISO/IEC 15504. Also, 62% of accepted studies are of the proposal and evaluation type; that is, they propose a framework and study the implementation of a proposal in one or more case studies respectively. On the other hand, it was found that most of the studies focused on the process improvement analysis phase. Likewise, in contrast with a previous study, proposal and validation type of studies increased in 9 papers each one from 2014 to date. This shows the interest of the scientific community in this domain.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
4 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信