正念诱导下特质正念对内隐种族偏见的调节作用:初步研究

Miranda H. Scheps, J. Walsh
{"title":"正念诱导下特质正念对内隐种族偏见的调节作用:初步研究","authors":"Miranda H. Scheps, J. Walsh","doi":"10.53841/bpstran.2020.22.1.12","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: This study was designed to explore the interactive effects of state and trait mindfulness in reducing implicit racial bias.Method: A 3-factor, quasi-experimental mixed design was employed. The factors were induction type, order of presentation and trait mindfulness. Post-induction implicit racism as well as explicit racism comprised the two dependent variables. Twenty-five older adults completed an Implicit Association Test on two occasions, one week apart.Results: The non-significant main effect of induction type (H1) was moderated by trait mindfulness (H2). Specifically, low trait mindful participants showed a significant reduction in implicit racism following the mindfulness induction compared with the control induction. There were no differences in implicit racism between induction conditions among high trait mindful counterparts. Explicit racism did not vary as a function of trait mindfulness (H3) and was independent of implicit racism (H4).Conclusion: A combination of state and trait mindfulness is needed to demonstrate a causal reduction in implicit racial bias. Differences between system 1 and system 2 thinking (Kahneman, 2011) are drawn upon to explain the findings.","PeriodicalId":92595,"journal":{"name":"Transpersonal psychology review","volume":"308 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The moderating effect of trait mindfulness on implicit racial bias following a brief mindfulness induction: A pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Miranda H. Scheps, J. Walsh\",\"doi\":\"10.53841/bpstran.2020.22.1.12\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: This study was designed to explore the interactive effects of state and trait mindfulness in reducing implicit racial bias.Method: A 3-factor, quasi-experimental mixed design was employed. The factors were induction type, order of presentation and trait mindfulness. Post-induction implicit racism as well as explicit racism comprised the two dependent variables. Twenty-five older adults completed an Implicit Association Test on two occasions, one week apart.Results: The non-significant main effect of induction type (H1) was moderated by trait mindfulness (H2). Specifically, low trait mindful participants showed a significant reduction in implicit racism following the mindfulness induction compared with the control induction. There were no differences in implicit racism between induction conditions among high trait mindful counterparts. Explicit racism did not vary as a function of trait mindfulness (H3) and was independent of implicit racism (H4).Conclusion: A combination of state and trait mindfulness is needed to demonstrate a causal reduction in implicit racial bias. Differences between system 1 and system 2 thinking (Kahneman, 2011) are drawn upon to explain the findings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transpersonal psychology review\",\"volume\":\"308 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transpersonal psychology review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpstran.2020.22.1.12\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transpersonal psychology review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.53841/bpstran.2020.22.1.12","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:探讨状态正念和特质正念在减少内隐种族偏见中的交互作用。方法:采用三因素准实验混合设计。影响因素有诱导类型、呈现顺序和特质正念。归化后内隐种族主义和外显种族主义构成两个因变量。25名老年人分两次完成内隐联想测试,间隔一周。结果:诱导型(H1)的非显著主效应被特质正念(H2)所调节。具体来说,低特质正念的参与者在正念诱导后内隐种族主义的表现明显低于对照组。内隐种族主义在高特质正念的诱导条件下没有差异。外显种族主义不随特质正念而变化(H3),与内隐种族主义无关(H4)。结论:需要结合状态正念和特质正念来证明内隐种族偏见的因果减少。系统1和系统2思维之间的差异(Kahneman, 2011)被用来解释研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The moderating effect of trait mindfulness on implicit racial bias following a brief mindfulness induction: A pilot study
Objective: This study was designed to explore the interactive effects of state and trait mindfulness in reducing implicit racial bias.Method: A 3-factor, quasi-experimental mixed design was employed. The factors were induction type, order of presentation and trait mindfulness. Post-induction implicit racism as well as explicit racism comprised the two dependent variables. Twenty-five older adults completed an Implicit Association Test on two occasions, one week apart.Results: The non-significant main effect of induction type (H1) was moderated by trait mindfulness (H2). Specifically, low trait mindful participants showed a significant reduction in implicit racism following the mindfulness induction compared with the control induction. There were no differences in implicit racism between induction conditions among high trait mindful counterparts. Explicit racism did not vary as a function of trait mindfulness (H3) and was independent of implicit racism (H4).Conclusion: A combination of state and trait mindfulness is needed to demonstrate a causal reduction in implicit racial bias. Differences between system 1 and system 2 thinking (Kahneman, 2011) are drawn upon to explain the findings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信