亚伯拉罕·凯波尔对自然科学的看法

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Koers Pub Date : 2021-06-17 DOI:10.19108/KOERS.86.1.2497
Steve Bishop
{"title":"亚伯拉罕·凯波尔对自然科学的看法","authors":"Steve Bishop","doi":"10.19108/KOERS.86.1.2497","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines Kuyper’s view of the natural sciences. For Kuyper science is by design a unique creature of God, it flourishes within society, it grows and develops. It is part of creation, so even if there were to have been no fall, we would still have science. The fall, however, has impacted on science to an unimaginable extent. Science is independent of both church and state, thus science must be allowed to flourish unhampered by both. Science, for Kuyper, involves thinking God’s thoughts after him. There are two kinds of science and two kinds of people: normalists and abnormalists – what makes the difference is regeneration or palingenesis – this is Kuyper’s antithesis. Common grace is important for science without it the post-fall decline of science would be absolute. Strands of scholasticism are identified in Kuyper’s approach.","PeriodicalId":38057,"journal":{"name":"Koers","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abraham Kuyper’s view of the natural sciences\",\"authors\":\"Steve Bishop\",\"doi\":\"10.19108/KOERS.86.1.2497\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper examines Kuyper’s view of the natural sciences. For Kuyper science is by design a unique creature of God, it flourishes within society, it grows and develops. It is part of creation, so even if there were to have been no fall, we would still have science. The fall, however, has impacted on science to an unimaginable extent. Science is independent of both church and state, thus science must be allowed to flourish unhampered by both. Science, for Kuyper, involves thinking God’s thoughts after him. There are two kinds of science and two kinds of people: normalists and abnormalists – what makes the difference is regeneration or palingenesis – this is Kuyper’s antithesis. Common grace is important for science without it the post-fall decline of science would be absolute. Strands of scholasticism are identified in Kuyper’s approach.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38057,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Koers\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Koers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19108/KOERS.86.1.2497\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Koers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19108/KOERS.86.1.2497","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文考察了凯伯尔的自然科学观。对于凯伯尔来说,科学是上帝设计的独特创造物,它在社会中繁荣,它成长和发展。它是创造的一部分,所以即使没有堕落,我们仍然会有科学。然而,这种衰落对科学的影响达到了难以想象的程度。科学独立于教会和国家,因此必须允许科学在不受两者阻碍的情况下蓬勃发展。对凯伯尔来说,科学包括按照上帝的想法思考上帝的想法。有两种科学和两种人:正常主义者和不正常主义者——区别在于再生或轮回——这是凯波尔的对立面。普通的恩典对科学很重要,没有它,科学的衰落将是绝对的。在凯波尔的方法中发现了经院哲学的分支。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abraham Kuyper’s view of the natural sciences
This paper examines Kuyper’s view of the natural sciences. For Kuyper science is by design a unique creature of God, it flourishes within society, it grows and develops. It is part of creation, so even if there were to have been no fall, we would still have science. The fall, however, has impacted on science to an unimaginable extent. Science is independent of both church and state, thus science must be allowed to flourish unhampered by both. Science, for Kuyper, involves thinking God’s thoughts after him. There are two kinds of science and two kinds of people: normalists and abnormalists – what makes the difference is regeneration or palingenesis – this is Kuyper’s antithesis. Common grace is important for science without it the post-fall decline of science would be absolute. Strands of scholasticism are identified in Kuyper’s approach.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Koers
Koers Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信