在海上气举井中不使用直通油管桥塞的无钻机断水实用解决方案,GUPCO -埃及

M. Abdulmageed, Aly Elkordy, M. Vazquez
{"title":"在海上气举井中不使用直通油管桥塞的无钻机断水实用解决方案,GUPCO -埃及","authors":"M. Abdulmageed, Aly Elkordy, M. Vazquez","doi":"10.2118/200043-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Gulf of Suez Petroleum Company (GUPCO) is one of the main production Companies in Egypt. Most of production rate in GUPCO is dependent on gas lift method for lifting reservoir fluid to the surface. Many reservoirs in Gulf of Suez are depletion (solution gas drive); so GUPCO injects about 150,000 BWPD to compensate reservoir pressure, and GUPCO has several active water drive reservoirs which water increasing comes from bottom intervals in some cases. As the water cut increases in the well, water shut off (WSO) is required; based on production logging tool (PLT) data, to avoid water loading (backpressure on formation), allow low quality sand/ intervals to share in production, avoid corrosion of wellbore tubing, and scale build up in the tubing which may cost a lot of money for cleaning.\n In general, GUPCO uses thru-tubing bridge plug (TTBP) and capping it with sufficient length of cement column for rigless WSO. As all fields of GUPCO are offshore; so WSO and other jobs are costly in comparison to onshore fields. Based on this, any cost saving, innovation, or idea lead to maximize output in safe manner (e.g. increasing well production oil) is highly appreciated and recommended for execution. Water shutoff techniques are either mechanical methods or chemical methods. These methods can be used individually or together in one job. Mechanical methods are usually used in wellbore WSO, and chemical methods are used in near wellbore (NWB) for plugging perm zones or restricting water flow as relative permeability modifier (RPM) chemical. Water shut off selection depends on many factors as well deviation, well completion type, and others that should be taken in consideration.\n This paper details some of the challenges associated with performing conventional WSO using electric-line and how to overcome these challenges. For our interested case, there is no common thru-tubing bridge plug (TTBP) in the market can be set in 9 5/8\" and pass through minimum tubing restriction (XN- nipple 2.63\" ID). Therefore, the well was planned to perform WSO using CTU with high cost, which is low priority for the time being. The practical WSO method provides solution for these challenges with low cost, and high percentage of success.","PeriodicalId":10912,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, March 23, 2022","volume":"41 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practical Solution for Rigless Water Shut off Without Using Thru- Tubing Bridge Plug in offshore Gas Lift Well, GUPCO - Egypt\",\"authors\":\"M. Abdulmageed, Aly Elkordy, M. Vazquez\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/200043-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The Gulf of Suez Petroleum Company (GUPCO) is one of the main production Companies in Egypt. Most of production rate in GUPCO is dependent on gas lift method for lifting reservoir fluid to the surface. Many reservoirs in Gulf of Suez are depletion (solution gas drive); so GUPCO injects about 150,000 BWPD to compensate reservoir pressure, and GUPCO has several active water drive reservoirs which water increasing comes from bottom intervals in some cases. As the water cut increases in the well, water shut off (WSO) is required; based on production logging tool (PLT) data, to avoid water loading (backpressure on formation), allow low quality sand/ intervals to share in production, avoid corrosion of wellbore tubing, and scale build up in the tubing which may cost a lot of money for cleaning.\\n In general, GUPCO uses thru-tubing bridge plug (TTBP) and capping it with sufficient length of cement column for rigless WSO. As all fields of GUPCO are offshore; so WSO and other jobs are costly in comparison to onshore fields. Based on this, any cost saving, innovation, or idea lead to maximize output in safe manner (e.g. increasing well production oil) is highly appreciated and recommended for execution. Water shutoff techniques are either mechanical methods or chemical methods. These methods can be used individually or together in one job. Mechanical methods are usually used in wellbore WSO, and chemical methods are used in near wellbore (NWB) for plugging perm zones or restricting water flow as relative permeability modifier (RPM) chemical. Water shut off selection depends on many factors as well deviation, well completion type, and others that should be taken in consideration.\\n This paper details some of the challenges associated with performing conventional WSO using electric-line and how to overcome these challenges. For our interested case, there is no common thru-tubing bridge plug (TTBP) in the market can be set in 9 5/8\\\" and pass through minimum tubing restriction (XN- nipple 2.63\\\" ID). Therefore, the well was planned to perform WSO using CTU with high cost, which is low priority for the time being. The practical WSO method provides solution for these challenges with low cost, and high percentage of success.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10912,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Wed, March 23, 2022\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Wed, March 23, 2022\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/200043-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, March 23, 2022","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/200043-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

苏伊士海湾石油公司(GUPCO)是埃及主要的石油生产公司之一。GUPCO的大部分产量取决于气举方法将储层流体举升到地面。苏伊士湾许多储层为衰竭型(溶气驱);因此,中国电力公司每天注入约150bwpd来补偿油藏压力,中国电力公司有几个活跃的水驱油藏,在某些情况下,水的增加来自底部层段。随着井中含水率的增加,需要采取断水措施;根据生产测井工具(PLT)数据,为了避免水载荷(地层反压),允许低质量的砂/层段在生产中共享,避免井筒油管腐蚀,防止油管结垢,这可能需要花费大量资金进行清洗。通常,GUPCO使用过油管桥塞(TTBP),并用足够长度的水泥柱对其进行封堵,用于无钻机的WSO。由于GUPCO的所有油田都在海上;因此,与陆上油田相比,WSO和其他作业的成本更高。基于此,任何能够以安全方式实现产量最大化的成本节约、创新或想法(例如增加油井产量)都受到高度赞赏,并被推荐执行。堵水技术有机械堵水和化学堵水两种。这些方法可以单独使用,也可以在一个作业中一起使用。机械方法通常用于井筒WSO,而化学方法则用于近井(NWB)区域,作为相对渗透率改进剂(RPM)用于封堵渗透层或限制水流。堵水的选择取决于许多因素,如井斜、完井类型以及其他需要考虑的因素。本文详细介绍了使用电力线路执行传统WSO的一些挑战,以及如何克服这些挑战。对于我们感兴趣的案例,市场上没有常见的直通油管桥塞(TTBP)可以设置在9 5/8”,并通过最小油管限制(XN-短节2.63”ID)。因此,该井计划采用成本较高的CTU进行WSO,目前优先级较低。实用的WSO方法为这些挑战提供了低成本、高成功率的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Practical Solution for Rigless Water Shut off Without Using Thru- Tubing Bridge Plug in offshore Gas Lift Well, GUPCO - Egypt
The Gulf of Suez Petroleum Company (GUPCO) is one of the main production Companies in Egypt. Most of production rate in GUPCO is dependent on gas lift method for lifting reservoir fluid to the surface. Many reservoirs in Gulf of Suez are depletion (solution gas drive); so GUPCO injects about 150,000 BWPD to compensate reservoir pressure, and GUPCO has several active water drive reservoirs which water increasing comes from bottom intervals in some cases. As the water cut increases in the well, water shut off (WSO) is required; based on production logging tool (PLT) data, to avoid water loading (backpressure on formation), allow low quality sand/ intervals to share in production, avoid corrosion of wellbore tubing, and scale build up in the tubing which may cost a lot of money for cleaning. In general, GUPCO uses thru-tubing bridge plug (TTBP) and capping it with sufficient length of cement column for rigless WSO. As all fields of GUPCO are offshore; so WSO and other jobs are costly in comparison to onshore fields. Based on this, any cost saving, innovation, or idea lead to maximize output in safe manner (e.g. increasing well production oil) is highly appreciated and recommended for execution. Water shutoff techniques are either mechanical methods or chemical methods. These methods can be used individually or together in one job. Mechanical methods are usually used in wellbore WSO, and chemical methods are used in near wellbore (NWB) for plugging perm zones or restricting water flow as relative permeability modifier (RPM) chemical. Water shut off selection depends on many factors as well deviation, well completion type, and others that should be taken in consideration. This paper details some of the challenges associated with performing conventional WSO using electric-line and how to overcome these challenges. For our interested case, there is no common thru-tubing bridge plug (TTBP) in the market can be set in 9 5/8" and pass through minimum tubing restriction (XN- nipple 2.63" ID). Therefore, the well was planned to perform WSO using CTU with high cost, which is low priority for the time being. The practical WSO method provides solution for these challenges with low cost, and high percentage of success.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信