十字路口的新娘奥利金对《雅歌》的戏剧性诠释

IF 0.1 3区 哲学 0 RELIGION
L. Perrone
{"title":"十字路口的新娘奥利金对《雅歌》的戏剧性诠释","authors":"L. Perrone","doi":"10.2143/ETL.82.1.2014921","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Origen’s exegesis of the Song of Songs, despite the praise it generally raised both in antiquity and in modern times, still awaits for deeper investigation as far as the literary project of the Alexandrian and its output are concerned. In this respect, it is difficult not only to exactly define the mutual relations between the Commentary and the Homilies on the Songs, apart from the evident similarity of their themes, but more specifically to catch the particular nature of Origen’s interpretation at the first level of the biblical text against his well-known allegorism. Viewing the littera or historia of the Song as a theatrical piece, as especially shown in the Commentary, Origen delivers a dramatic interpretation which by its careful description of the successive scenes develops into a proper script for the stage. Though this explanation is meant to guide the reader to a further level of interpretation, the “letter” cannot here be appreciated simply as the provisional step leading to the “spirit”, i.e. the spiritual intelligence of the Song which is in principle the only one permitted for Origen in this biblical love poetry. Instead of that, through the discourse engaged by the dramatic interpretation, on the one hand, there is an overlapping of both the “historical” and the “spiritual” explanation and, on the other hand, the dramatic exegesis also delivers a surplus of sense which is not totally subsumed in the spiritual interpretation. At moments the Song as “play” seems therefore to gain in Origen’s perceptive reading a life of its own.","PeriodicalId":42509,"journal":{"name":"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses","volume":"142 1","pages":"69-102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2006-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The bride at the crossroads origen's dramatic interpretation of the Song of Songs\",\"authors\":\"L. Perrone\",\"doi\":\"10.2143/ETL.82.1.2014921\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Origen’s exegesis of the Song of Songs, despite the praise it generally raised both in antiquity and in modern times, still awaits for deeper investigation as far as the literary project of the Alexandrian and its output are concerned. In this respect, it is difficult not only to exactly define the mutual relations between the Commentary and the Homilies on the Songs, apart from the evident similarity of their themes, but more specifically to catch the particular nature of Origen’s interpretation at the first level of the biblical text against his well-known allegorism. Viewing the littera or historia of the Song as a theatrical piece, as especially shown in the Commentary, Origen delivers a dramatic interpretation which by its careful description of the successive scenes develops into a proper script for the stage. Though this explanation is meant to guide the reader to a further level of interpretation, the “letter” cannot here be appreciated simply as the provisional step leading to the “spirit”, i.e. the spiritual intelligence of the Song which is in principle the only one permitted for Origen in this biblical love poetry. Instead of that, through the discourse engaged by the dramatic interpretation, on the one hand, there is an overlapping of both the “historical” and the “spiritual” explanation and, on the other hand, the dramatic exegesis also delivers a surplus of sense which is not totally subsumed in the spiritual interpretation. At moments the Song as “play” seems therefore to gain in Origen’s perceptive reading a life of its own.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42509,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses\",\"volume\":\"142 1\",\"pages\":\"69-102\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2006-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2143/ETL.82.1.2014921\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2143/ETL.82.1.2014921","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

俄利根的《雅歌》训诂,尽管它在古代和现代都普遍受到赞扬,但就亚历山大文学项目及其产出而言,仍有待更深入的调查。在这方面,这是困难的,不仅准确地定义的相互关系之间的评论和说教的歌曲,除了明显的相似之处,他们的主题,但更具体地说,要抓住奥利的解释在圣经文本的第一层次对他著名的寓言的特殊性质。俄利根将《宋文》或《宋史》看作是一部戏剧作品,在《评论》中尤其如此。俄利根通过对连续场景的仔细描述,将戏剧的解释发展成为舞台上合适的剧本。虽然这个解释是为了引导读者进一步理解,“信”在这里不能被简单地理解为通向“精神”的临时步骤,即歌曲的精神智慧,原则上是奥利金在这首圣经爱情诗中唯一允许的。相反,通过戏剧解释的话语,一方面,“历史”和“精神”的解释是重叠的,另一方面,戏剧注释也传递了一种多余的意义,而这种意义并不完全包含在精神解释中。有时,作为“游戏”的歌曲似乎因此在奥利金的敏锐阅读中获得了自己的生命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The bride at the crossroads origen's dramatic interpretation of the Song of Songs
Origen’s exegesis of the Song of Songs, despite the praise it generally raised both in antiquity and in modern times, still awaits for deeper investigation as far as the literary project of the Alexandrian and its output are concerned. In this respect, it is difficult not only to exactly define the mutual relations between the Commentary and the Homilies on the Songs, apart from the evident similarity of their themes, but more specifically to catch the particular nature of Origen’s interpretation at the first level of the biblical text against his well-known allegorism. Viewing the littera or historia of the Song as a theatrical piece, as especially shown in the Commentary, Origen delivers a dramatic interpretation which by its careful description of the successive scenes develops into a proper script for the stage. Though this explanation is meant to guide the reader to a further level of interpretation, the “letter” cannot here be appreciated simply as the provisional step leading to the “spirit”, i.e. the spiritual intelligence of the Song which is in principle the only one permitted for Origen in this biblical love poetry. Instead of that, through the discourse engaged by the dramatic interpretation, on the one hand, there is an overlapping of both the “historical” and the “spiritual” explanation and, on the other hand, the dramatic exegesis also delivers a surplus of sense which is not totally subsumed in the spiritual interpretation. At moments the Song as “play” seems therefore to gain in Origen’s perceptive reading a life of its own.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Ephemerides Theologicae Lovanienses (ETL), founded in 1924, is a quarterly publication by professors of Theology and Canon Law at the Katholieke Universiteit Leuven and the Université catholique de Louvain (Louvain-la-Neuve). Each volume totals ca. 1300 pages. Issues 1 (April) and 4 (December) contain articles, book reviews and chronicles in various languages (English, French, German). Issue 2-3 (September) represents the annual Elenchus Bibliographicus, an extensive bibliography of books and articles that appeared during the preceding year. The bibliography (ca. 15,000 entries) covers the entire field of Theology and Canon Law: History of Theology, History of Religions.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信