“相信科学!”美国和德国框架共鸣的制度条件:未来的星期五的案例

IF 1.8 Q2 SOCIOLOGY
T. Kern, Dahla Opitz
{"title":"“相信科学!”美国和德国框架共鸣的制度条件:未来的星期五的案例","authors":"T. Kern, Dahla Opitz","doi":"10.1080/00207659.2021.1910431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This report focuses on the discursive opportunity structure of Fridays for Future in the United States and Germany. We will show that the movement's frame resonance relies strongly on the differential receptivity of both countries' political and communicative institutions for the findings of climate science. The first part presents how climate science shapes the framing of Fridays for Future. The second part explores the influence of climate science on the regime of political knowledge production and the mass media.","PeriodicalId":45362,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sociology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Trust Science!\\\" Institutional Conditions of Frame Resonance in the United States and Germany: The Case of Fridays for Future\",\"authors\":\"T. Kern, Dahla Opitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00207659.2021.1910431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This report focuses on the discursive opportunity structure of Fridays for Future in the United States and Germany. We will show that the movement's frame resonance relies strongly on the differential receptivity of both countries' political and communicative institutions for the findings of climate science. The first part presents how climate science shapes the framing of Fridays for Future. The second part explores the influence of climate science on the regime of political knowledge production and the mass media.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sociology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2021.1910431\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2021.1910431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

摘要:本报告主要研究美国和德国“星期五为未来”节目的话语机会结构。我们将表明,运动的框架共鸣在很大程度上依赖于两国政治和交流机构对气候科学发现的不同接受程度。第一部分介绍了气候科学如何塑造“未来周五”的框架。第二部分探讨气候科学对政治知识生产体制和大众传媒的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"Trust Science!" Institutional Conditions of Frame Resonance in the United States and Germany: The Case of Fridays for Future
Abstract This report focuses on the discursive opportunity structure of Fridays for Future in the United States and Germany. We will show that the movement's frame resonance relies strongly on the differential receptivity of both countries' political and communicative institutions for the findings of climate science. The first part presents how climate science shapes the framing of Fridays for Future. The second part explores the influence of climate science on the regime of political knowledge production and the mass media.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信