{"title":"“相信科学!”美国和德国框架共鸣的制度条件:未来的星期五的案例","authors":"T. Kern, Dahla Opitz","doi":"10.1080/00207659.2021.1910431","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This report focuses on the discursive opportunity structure of Fridays for Future in the United States and Germany. We will show that the movement's frame resonance relies strongly on the differential receptivity of both countries' political and communicative institutions for the findings of climate science. The first part presents how climate science shapes the framing of Fridays for Future. The second part explores the influence of climate science on the regime of political knowledge production and the mass media.","PeriodicalId":45362,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Sociology","volume":"58 1","pages":"249 - 256"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"Trust Science!\\\" Institutional Conditions of Frame Resonance in the United States and Germany: The Case of Fridays for Future\",\"authors\":\"T. Kern, Dahla Opitz\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00207659.2021.1910431\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract This report focuses on the discursive opportunity structure of Fridays for Future in the United States and Germany. We will show that the movement's frame resonance relies strongly on the differential receptivity of both countries' political and communicative institutions for the findings of climate science. The first part presents how climate science shapes the framing of Fridays for Future. The second part explores the influence of climate science on the regime of political knowledge production and the mass media.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45362,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Sociology\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"249 - 256\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Sociology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2021.1910431\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Sociology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00207659.2021.1910431","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
"Trust Science!" Institutional Conditions of Frame Resonance in the United States and Germany: The Case of Fridays for Future
Abstract This report focuses on the discursive opportunity structure of Fridays for Future in the United States and Germany. We will show that the movement's frame resonance relies strongly on the differential receptivity of both countries' political and communicative institutions for the findings of climate science. The first part presents how climate science shapes the framing of Fridays for Future. The second part explores the influence of climate science on the regime of political knowledge production and the mass media.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
