雾化吸入沙丁胺醇与间隔剂吸入沙丁胺醇治疗儿童急性哮喘发作及短期病程的疗效比较

A. Yadav, S. Gupta, Kawalpreet Chhabra, O. Chaurasiya, M. Shastri
{"title":"雾化吸入沙丁胺醇与间隔剂吸入沙丁胺醇治疗儿童急性哮喘发作及短期病程的疗效比较","authors":"A. Yadav, S. Gupta, Kawalpreet Chhabra, O. Chaurasiya, M. Shastri","doi":"10.32677/ijch.v9i8.3433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Asthma is a common chronic disease in childhood and has been subject of studies for at least two decades, due to its increasing prevalence. The symptoms are persistent, recurrent, and entirely related to bronchial hyper-responsiveness to many environmental triggers. Nebulization and metered dose inhaler (MDI) are two available modalities of salbutamol administration in patients with acute asthmatic attack. Aim: The aim of the study was to compare the relative efficacy of nebulizer and MDI with spacer for the administration of salbutamol in the treatment of acute asthmatic attack. Materials and Methods: A randomized, prospective, and interventional study was conducted on 100 children aged 1–12 years with acute asthmatic attack at a tertiary care. The subjects were randomized into two groups for salbutamol administration. Group I was given salbutamol by nebulizer and Group II by MDI with spacer. Demographic data and detailed history was collected. Children were categorized into mild, moderate, and severe grade according to peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and pulmonary index (PI) score. Oxygen saturation, PEFR, and PI were monitored at 0, 20, 40, and 60 min of therapy. Other details such as duration of hospital stay and oxygen requirement were also noted. Results: One hundred children with male female ratio of 1.12:1 were included in the study. Highest incidence was seen in age group of 1–3 years (38%). Statistically significant change in PI and PEFR was noted with treatment in both the groups (p<0.05). On comparison between MDI and nebulizer group, no statistically significant difference was found (p>0.05). Conclusion: MDI with spacer is an effective alternative to nebulizer for the administration of salbutamol drug in acute asthmatic attack in pediatric patients.","PeriodicalId":22476,"journal":{"name":"The Indian journal of child health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of inhaled salbutamol therapy through nebulizer versus mdi with spacer in children with acute asthmatic attack and short-term course\",\"authors\":\"A. Yadav, S. Gupta, Kawalpreet Chhabra, O. Chaurasiya, M. Shastri\",\"doi\":\"10.32677/ijch.v9i8.3433\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: Asthma is a common chronic disease in childhood and has been subject of studies for at least two decades, due to its increasing prevalence. The symptoms are persistent, recurrent, and entirely related to bronchial hyper-responsiveness to many environmental triggers. Nebulization and metered dose inhaler (MDI) are two available modalities of salbutamol administration in patients with acute asthmatic attack. Aim: The aim of the study was to compare the relative efficacy of nebulizer and MDI with spacer for the administration of salbutamol in the treatment of acute asthmatic attack. Materials and Methods: A randomized, prospective, and interventional study was conducted on 100 children aged 1–12 years with acute asthmatic attack at a tertiary care. The subjects were randomized into two groups for salbutamol administration. Group I was given salbutamol by nebulizer and Group II by MDI with spacer. Demographic data and detailed history was collected. Children were categorized into mild, moderate, and severe grade according to peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and pulmonary index (PI) score. Oxygen saturation, PEFR, and PI were monitored at 0, 20, 40, and 60 min of therapy. Other details such as duration of hospital stay and oxygen requirement were also noted. Results: One hundred children with male female ratio of 1.12:1 were included in the study. Highest incidence was seen in age group of 1–3 years (38%). Statistically significant change in PI and PEFR was noted with treatment in both the groups (p<0.05). On comparison between MDI and nebulizer group, no statistically significant difference was found (p>0.05). Conclusion: MDI with spacer is an effective alternative to nebulizer for the administration of salbutamol drug in acute asthmatic attack in pediatric patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":22476,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Indian journal of child health\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Indian journal of child health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32677/ijch.v9i8.3433\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Indian journal of child health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32677/ijch.v9i8.3433","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:哮喘是一种常见的儿童慢性疾病,由于其发病率不断上升,至少二十年来一直是研究的主题。这些症状是持续的,反复发作的,完全与支气管对许多环境诱因的高反应性有关。雾化和计量吸入器(MDI)是急性哮喘发作患者沙丁胺醇给药的两种可用方式。目的:比较雾化器、MDI和间隔剂在沙丁胺醇给药治疗急性哮喘发作中的相对疗效。材料和方法:一项随机、前瞻性和干预性研究对100名1-12岁在三级医疗机构急性哮喘发作的儿童进行了研究。受试者随机分为两组给予沙丁胺醇治疗。ⅰ组采用沙丁胺醇喷雾器,ⅱ组采用MDI加间隔剂。收集了人口统计数据和详细的病史。根据呼气峰值流速(PEFR)和肺指数(PI)评分将患儿分为轻度、中度和重度。在治疗0、20、40和60分钟时监测血氧饱和度、PEFR和PI。还注意到住院时间和需氧量等其他细节。结果:纳入儿童100例,男女比例为1.12:1。发病率最高的年龄组为1-3岁(38%)。两组患者PI、PEFR随治疗变化均有统计学意义(p0.05)。结论:小儿急性哮喘发作时,MDI加间隔器是沙丁胺醇类药物给药的有效替代雾化器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of inhaled salbutamol therapy through nebulizer versus mdi with spacer in children with acute asthmatic attack and short-term course
Introduction: Asthma is a common chronic disease in childhood and has been subject of studies for at least two decades, due to its increasing prevalence. The symptoms are persistent, recurrent, and entirely related to bronchial hyper-responsiveness to many environmental triggers. Nebulization and metered dose inhaler (MDI) are two available modalities of salbutamol administration in patients with acute asthmatic attack. Aim: The aim of the study was to compare the relative efficacy of nebulizer and MDI with spacer for the administration of salbutamol in the treatment of acute asthmatic attack. Materials and Methods: A randomized, prospective, and interventional study was conducted on 100 children aged 1–12 years with acute asthmatic attack at a tertiary care. The subjects were randomized into two groups for salbutamol administration. Group I was given salbutamol by nebulizer and Group II by MDI with spacer. Demographic data and detailed history was collected. Children were categorized into mild, moderate, and severe grade according to peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) and pulmonary index (PI) score. Oxygen saturation, PEFR, and PI were monitored at 0, 20, 40, and 60 min of therapy. Other details such as duration of hospital stay and oxygen requirement were also noted. Results: One hundred children with male female ratio of 1.12:1 were included in the study. Highest incidence was seen in age group of 1–3 years (38%). Statistically significant change in PI and PEFR was noted with treatment in both the groups (p<0.05). On comparison between MDI and nebulizer group, no statistically significant difference was found (p>0.05). Conclusion: MDI with spacer is an effective alternative to nebulizer for the administration of salbutamol drug in acute asthmatic attack in pediatric patients.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信