超声厚测法(USP)与非接触式厚测法(NCP)测量角膜中央厚度(CCT)的比较研究

S. Puri, Narendra Prasad B B, Syeda Sadiya Ikram
{"title":"超声厚测法(USP)与非接触式厚测法(NCP)测量角膜中央厚度(CCT)的比较研究","authors":"S. Puri, Narendra Prasad B B, Syeda Sadiya Ikram","doi":"10.18231/j.ijooo.2022.029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to compare and measure the reliability, repeatability of USP and NCP (NIDEK NT530P) clinically.It was a hospital-based comparative study conducted in the outpatient department of Ophthalmology, CCT measurements were taken by NCP (NIDEK NT530P) and USP.This study done on 50 subjects, age group between 18-25 Years and it’s approved by IRB committee, subjects with emmetropia and low myopia only were included. Participants were subjected to comprehensive ophthalmic examination, Corneal thickness measurement taken with NCP(NIDEK NT530P) and USP. To eliminate the effect of diurnal variations on thickness all measurements were taken between 2 PM -6 PM.CCT measurements was first taken by NCP (Nidek NT530P) five readings were taken followed by USP. Eyes was anesthetized, and the probe placed perpendicularly on the cornea and the readings were observed in the display. The test was repeated five times and the mean values was calculated. The results were well inside the normal range and there are no significant measurements obtained by these devices.","PeriodicalId":14485,"journal":{"name":"IP International Journal of Ocular Oncology and Oculoplasty","volume":"38 2-3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative study of measurements of central corneal thickness (CCT) by ultra-sonic pachymetry (USP) VS non-contact pachymetry (NCP)\",\"authors\":\"S. Puri, Narendra Prasad B B, Syeda Sadiya Ikram\",\"doi\":\"10.18231/j.ijooo.2022.029\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to compare and measure the reliability, repeatability of USP and NCP (NIDEK NT530P) clinically.It was a hospital-based comparative study conducted in the outpatient department of Ophthalmology, CCT measurements were taken by NCP (NIDEK NT530P) and USP.This study done on 50 subjects, age group between 18-25 Years and it’s approved by IRB committee, subjects with emmetropia and low myopia only were included. Participants were subjected to comprehensive ophthalmic examination, Corneal thickness measurement taken with NCP(NIDEK NT530P) and USP. To eliminate the effect of diurnal variations on thickness all measurements were taken between 2 PM -6 PM.CCT measurements was first taken by NCP (Nidek NT530P) five readings were taken followed by USP. Eyes was anesthetized, and the probe placed perpendicularly on the cornea and the readings were observed in the display. The test was repeated five times and the mean values was calculated. The results were well inside the normal range and there are no significant measurements obtained by these devices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IP International Journal of Ocular Oncology and Oculoplasty\",\"volume\":\"38 2-3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IP International Journal of Ocular Oncology and Oculoplasty\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijooo.2022.029\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IP International Journal of Ocular Oncology and Oculoplasty","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijooo.2022.029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在比较和衡量USP与NCP (NIDEK NT530P)的临床可靠性和可重复性。这是一项以医院为基础的眼科门诊比较研究,CCT测量由NCP (NIDEK NT530P)和USP进行。本研究涉及50名受试者,年龄在18-25岁之间,经IRB委员会批准,仅包括有远视和低近视的受试者。受试者接受全面眼科检查,用NCP(NIDEK NT530P)和USP测量角膜厚度。为了消除日变化对厚度的影响,所有测量都在下午2点至6点之间进行。CCT测量首先由NCP (Nidek NT530P)进行,五个读数随后是USP。眼睛麻醉,探头垂直放置于角膜上,在显示器上观察读数。重复试验5次,计算平均值。结果完全在正常范围内,这些装置没有得到显著的测量结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative study of measurements of central corneal thickness (CCT) by ultra-sonic pachymetry (USP) VS non-contact pachymetry (NCP)
This study aims to compare and measure the reliability, repeatability of USP and NCP (NIDEK NT530P) clinically.It was a hospital-based comparative study conducted in the outpatient department of Ophthalmology, CCT measurements were taken by NCP (NIDEK NT530P) and USP.This study done on 50 subjects, age group between 18-25 Years and it’s approved by IRB committee, subjects with emmetropia and low myopia only were included. Participants were subjected to comprehensive ophthalmic examination, Corneal thickness measurement taken with NCP(NIDEK NT530P) and USP. To eliminate the effect of diurnal variations on thickness all measurements were taken between 2 PM -6 PM.CCT measurements was first taken by NCP (Nidek NT530P) five readings were taken followed by USP. Eyes was anesthetized, and the probe placed perpendicularly on the cornea and the readings were observed in the display. The test was repeated five times and the mean values was calculated. The results were well inside the normal range and there are no significant measurements obtained by these devices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信