不同经验水平的急诊神经放射科医师在各方面评分方面的专家间共识

IF 2.2 Q2 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
P. Andropova, P. Gavrilov, I. P. Kazantseva, N. I. Kochanova, A. Narkevich, T. Trofimova
{"title":"不同经验水平的急诊神经放射科医师在各方面评分方面的专家间共识","authors":"P. Andropova, P. Gavrilov, I. P. Kazantseva, N. I. Kochanova, A. Narkevich, T. Trofimova","doi":"10.52560/2713-0118-2022-5-10-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fifteen radiologists independently evaluated fifty non-contrast brain computed tomography of patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) stroke. Within-group agreement was either negligible or moderate, and the best inter-expert agreement was observed between neuroradiologists with 1 to 3 years of experience. Our study allows us to conclude that ASPECTS is not an ideal tool for standardizing the diagnosis of MCA stroke, therefore, it is necessary to develop new models of standardization systems, as well as the use of hydride diagnostics, including automatic analysis.","PeriodicalId":51864,"journal":{"name":"Radiology Research and Practice","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interexpert Agreement Between Emergency Neuroradiologists with Different Levels of Experience in the Rating of ASPECTS\",\"authors\":\"P. Andropova, P. Gavrilov, I. P. Kazantseva, N. I. Kochanova, A. Narkevich, T. Trofimova\",\"doi\":\"10.52560/2713-0118-2022-5-10-25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fifteen radiologists independently evaluated fifty non-contrast brain computed tomography of patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) stroke. Within-group agreement was either negligible or moderate, and the best inter-expert agreement was observed between neuroradiologists with 1 to 3 years of experience. Our study allows us to conclude that ASPECTS is not an ideal tool for standardizing the diagnosis of MCA stroke, therefore, it is necessary to develop new models of standardization systems, as well as the use of hydride diagnostics, including automatic analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52560/2713-0118-2022-5-10-25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52560/2713-0118-2022-5-10-25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

15名放射科医生独立评估了50例大脑中动脉(MCA)卒中患者的非对比脑计算机断层扫描。组内一致性要么可忽略不计,要么中等,专家间一致性最好的是具有1至3年经验的神经放射学家。我们的研究让我们得出结论,ASPECTS并不是标准化MCA卒中诊断的理想工具,因此,有必要开发新的标准化系统模型,以及氢化物诊断的使用,包括自动分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Interexpert Agreement Between Emergency Neuroradiologists with Different Levels of Experience in the Rating of ASPECTS
Fifteen radiologists independently evaluated fifty non-contrast brain computed tomography of patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) stroke. Within-group agreement was either negligible or moderate, and the best inter-expert agreement was observed between neuroradiologists with 1 to 3 years of experience. Our study allows us to conclude that ASPECTS is not an ideal tool for standardizing the diagnosis of MCA stroke, therefore, it is necessary to develop new models of standardization systems, as well as the use of hydride diagnostics, including automatic analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiology Research and Practice
Radiology Research and Practice RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiology Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes articles on all areas of medical imaging. The journal promotes evidence-based radiology practice though the publication of original research, reviews, and clinical studies for a multidisciplinary audience. Radiology Research and Practice is archived in Portico, which provides permanent archiving for electronic scholarly journals, as well as via the LOCKSS initiative. It operates a fully open access publishing model which allows open global access to its published content. This model is supported through Article Processing Charges. For more information on Article Processing charges in gen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信