P. Andropova, P. Gavrilov, I. P. Kazantseva, N. I. Kochanova, A. Narkevich, T. Trofimova
{"title":"不同经验水平的急诊神经放射科医师在各方面评分方面的专家间共识","authors":"P. Andropova, P. Gavrilov, I. P. Kazantseva, N. I. Kochanova, A. Narkevich, T. Trofimova","doi":"10.52560/2713-0118-2022-5-10-25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fifteen radiologists independently evaluated fifty non-contrast brain computed tomography of patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) stroke. Within-group agreement was either negligible or moderate, and the best inter-expert agreement was observed between neuroradiologists with 1 to 3 years of experience. Our study allows us to conclude that ASPECTS is not an ideal tool for standardizing the diagnosis of MCA stroke, therefore, it is necessary to develop new models of standardization systems, as well as the use of hydride diagnostics, including automatic analysis.","PeriodicalId":51864,"journal":{"name":"Radiology Research and Practice","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interexpert Agreement Between Emergency Neuroradiologists with Different Levels of Experience in the Rating of ASPECTS\",\"authors\":\"P. Andropova, P. Gavrilov, I. P. Kazantseva, N. I. Kochanova, A. Narkevich, T. Trofimova\",\"doi\":\"10.52560/2713-0118-2022-5-10-25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fifteen radiologists independently evaluated fifty non-contrast brain computed tomography of patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) stroke. Within-group agreement was either negligible or moderate, and the best inter-expert agreement was observed between neuroradiologists with 1 to 3 years of experience. Our study allows us to conclude that ASPECTS is not an ideal tool for standardizing the diagnosis of MCA stroke, therefore, it is necessary to develop new models of standardization systems, as well as the use of hydride diagnostics, including automatic analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51864,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiology Research and Practice\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiology Research and Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52560/2713-0118-2022-5-10-25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiology Research and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52560/2713-0118-2022-5-10-25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Interexpert Agreement Between Emergency Neuroradiologists with Different Levels of Experience in the Rating of ASPECTS
Fifteen radiologists independently evaluated fifty non-contrast brain computed tomography of patients with middle cerebral artery (MCA) stroke. Within-group agreement was either negligible or moderate, and the best inter-expert agreement was observed between neuroradiologists with 1 to 3 years of experience. Our study allows us to conclude that ASPECTS is not an ideal tool for standardizing the diagnosis of MCA stroke, therefore, it is necessary to develop new models of standardization systems, as well as the use of hydride diagnostics, including automatic analysis.
期刊介绍:
Radiology Research and Practice is a peer-reviewed, Open Access journal that publishes articles on all areas of medical imaging. The journal promotes evidence-based radiology practice though the publication of original research, reviews, and clinical studies for a multidisciplinary audience. Radiology Research and Practice is archived in Portico, which provides permanent archiving for electronic scholarly journals, as well as via the LOCKSS initiative. It operates a fully open access publishing model which allows open global access to its published content. This model is supported through Article Processing Charges. For more information on Article Processing charges in gen