对视网膜病变患者进行教育

M Rothmann RN, MHS, AH Nyland RN, MScN, L Hammelsvang RN, L Petersen RN, G Kirketerp RN, MPM, MScN, JE Henriksen MD, PhD
{"title":"对视网膜病变患者进行教育","authors":"M Rothmann RN, MHS,&nbsp;AH Nyland RN, MScN,&nbsp;L Hammelsvang RN,&nbsp;L Petersen RN,&nbsp;G Kirketerp RN, MPM, MScN,&nbsp;JE Henriksen MD, PhD","doi":"10.1002/edn.179","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article describes the results of an intervention study considering patient education on retinopathy, aiming to increase knowledge of retinopathy, self-care and self-efficacy.</p><p>Fifty patients were randomised to either an education programme or standard follow up in the clinical setting. The patients were followed for two years. Parameters were measured at baseline, and after one and two years. Twelve patients were interviewed after one year using semi-structured focus group interviews. The analyses were grounded in the framework of Steinar Kvale and an approach based on Aaron Antonovsky′s ‘sense of coherence’.</p><p>Several themes emerged. The main themes in both groups were fear, knowledge and acceptance, but there was a difference in the way in which these themes were described. The intervention group could describe how they used the knowledge in their everyday life. In contrast, the control group indicated knowledge about retinopathy but appeared not to use this knowledge in everyday life. Furthermore, the intervention group regarded prevention of retinopathy as a responsibility shared between themselves and the health professionals in relation to self-care skills, whereas the control group appeared not to take responsibility. The only theme described identically in both groups was ‘anxiety’ at the time of diagnosis. The quantitative data did not show any significant effect of the patient education.</p><p>We conclude that education made a difference to the way in which the patients experienced retinopathy. The intervention group showed ‘sense of coherence’ by expressing comprehensibility, manageability, and meaningfulness. Copyright © 2011 FEND. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>","PeriodicalId":100496,"journal":{"name":"European Diabetes Nursing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-08-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/edn.179","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient education on retinopathy\",\"authors\":\"M Rothmann RN, MHS,&nbsp;AH Nyland RN, MScN,&nbsp;L Hammelsvang RN,&nbsp;L Petersen RN,&nbsp;G Kirketerp RN, MPM, MScN,&nbsp;JE Henriksen MD, PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/edn.179\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>This article describes the results of an intervention study considering patient education on retinopathy, aiming to increase knowledge of retinopathy, self-care and self-efficacy.</p><p>Fifty patients were randomised to either an education programme or standard follow up in the clinical setting. The patients were followed for two years. Parameters were measured at baseline, and after one and two years. Twelve patients were interviewed after one year using semi-structured focus group interviews. The analyses were grounded in the framework of Steinar Kvale and an approach based on Aaron Antonovsky′s ‘sense of coherence’.</p><p>Several themes emerged. The main themes in both groups were fear, knowledge and acceptance, but there was a difference in the way in which these themes were described. The intervention group could describe how they used the knowledge in their everyday life. In contrast, the control group indicated knowledge about retinopathy but appeared not to use this knowledge in everyday life. Furthermore, the intervention group regarded prevention of retinopathy as a responsibility shared between themselves and the health professionals in relation to self-care skills, whereas the control group appeared not to take responsibility. The only theme described identically in both groups was ‘anxiety’ at the time of diagnosis. The quantitative data did not show any significant effect of the patient education.</p><p>We conclude that education made a difference to the way in which the patients experienced retinopathy. The intervention group showed ‘sense of coherence’ by expressing comprehensibility, manageability, and meaningfulness. Copyright © 2011 FEND. Published by John Wiley &amp; Sons, Ltd.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100496,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Diabetes Nursing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2011-08-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/edn.179\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Diabetes Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn.179\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Diabetes Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/edn.179","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文描述了一项考虑对患者进行视网膜病变教育的干预研究的结果,旨在提高患者对视网膜病变、自我保健和自我效能的认识。50名患者被随机分配到教育计划或临床环境中的标准随访中。对这些患者进行了为期两年的随访。在基线、一年后和两年后测量参数。一年后对12名患者进行了半结构化焦点小组访谈。这些分析基于斯泰纳尔·克瓦勒的框架和亚伦·安东诺夫斯基的“连贯感”。出现了几个主题。两组的主题都是恐惧、了解和接受,但描述这些主题的方式有所不同。干预组可以描述他们如何在日常生活中使用这些知识。相比之下,对照组表示了解视网膜病变,但似乎没有在日常生活中使用这些知识。此外,干预组认为预防视网膜病变是他们和健康专业人员在自我护理技能方面共同承担的责任,而对照组似乎不承担责任。两组中唯一相同的主题是诊断时的“焦虑”。定量数据未显示患者教育的显著效果。我们得出结论,教育对患者经历视网膜病变的方式有影响。干预组通过表达可理解性、可管理性和意义表现出“连贯性”。版权所有©2011中华生态科学研究院。John Wiley &出版;儿子,有限公司
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Patient education on retinopathy

Patient education on retinopathy

This article describes the results of an intervention study considering patient education on retinopathy, aiming to increase knowledge of retinopathy, self-care and self-efficacy.

Fifty patients were randomised to either an education programme or standard follow up in the clinical setting. The patients were followed for two years. Parameters were measured at baseline, and after one and two years. Twelve patients were interviewed after one year using semi-structured focus group interviews. The analyses were grounded in the framework of Steinar Kvale and an approach based on Aaron Antonovsky′s ‘sense of coherence’.

Several themes emerged. The main themes in both groups were fear, knowledge and acceptance, but there was a difference in the way in which these themes were described. The intervention group could describe how they used the knowledge in their everyday life. In contrast, the control group indicated knowledge about retinopathy but appeared not to use this knowledge in everyday life. Furthermore, the intervention group regarded prevention of retinopathy as a responsibility shared between themselves and the health professionals in relation to self-care skills, whereas the control group appeared not to take responsibility. The only theme described identically in both groups was ‘anxiety’ at the time of diagnosis. The quantitative data did not show any significant effect of the patient education.

We conclude that education made a difference to the way in which the patients experienced retinopathy. The intervention group showed ‘sense of coherence’ by expressing comprehensibility, manageability, and meaningfulness. Copyright © 2011 FEND. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信