【异常子宫出血妇女的处理:法国国家妇产科医师学院(CNGOF)临床实践指南】。

IF 0.4 2区 哲学 0 ASIAN STUDIES
JOURNAL OF INDIAN PHILOSOPHY Pub Date : 2022-05-01 Epub Date: 2022-03-04 DOI:10.1016/j.gofs.2022.02.078
J-L Brun, G Plu-Bureau, C Huchon, X Ah-Kit, M Barral, P Chauvet, F Cornelis, M Cortet, P Crochet, V Delporte, G Dubernard, G Giraudet, A Gosset, O Graesslin, J Hugon-Rodin, L Lecointre, G Legendre, L Maitrot-Mantelet, L Marcellin, L Miquel, M Le Mitouard, C Proust, A Roquette, P Rousset, E Sangnier, M Sapoval, T Thubert, A Torre, F Trémollières, H Vernhet-Kovacsik, F Vidal, H Marret
{"title":"【异常子宫出血妇女的处理:法国国家妇产科医师学院(CNGOF)临床实践指南】。","authors":"J-L Brun, G Plu-Bureau, C Huchon, X Ah-Kit, M Barral, P Chauvet, F Cornelis, M Cortet, P Crochet, V Delporte, G Dubernard, G Giraudet, A Gosset, O Graesslin, J Hugon-Rodin, L Lecointre, G Legendre, L Maitrot-Mantelet, L Marcellin, L Miquel, M Le Mitouard, C Proust, A Roquette, P Rousset, E Sangnier, M Sapoval, T Thubert, A Torre, F Trémollières, H Vernhet-Kovacsik, F Vidal, H Marret","doi":"10.1016/j.gofs.2022.02.078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide French guidelines for the management of women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A consensus committee of 26 experts was formed. A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the beginning of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industrial funding (i.e. pharmaceutical, or medical devices). The authors were advised to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The last guidelines from the Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français (CNGOF) on the management of women with AUB was published in 2008. The literature seems now sufficient for an update. The committee studied questions within 7 fields (diagnosis; adolescent; idiopathic AUB; endometrial hyperplasia and polyps; fibroids type 0 to 2; fibroids type 3 and more; adenomyosis). Each question was formulated in a PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) format and the evidence profiles were produced. The literature review and recommendations were made according to the GRADE® methodology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The experts' synthesis work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 36 recommendations. Among the formalized recommendations, 19 present a strong agreement and 17 a weak agreement. Fourteen questions did not find any response in the literature. We preferred to abstain from recommending instead of providing expert advice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 36 recommendations made it possible to specify the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies of various clinical situations managed by the practitioner, from the simplest to the most complex.</p>","PeriodicalId":51854,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF INDIAN PHILOSOPHY","volume":"45 1","pages":"345-373"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Management of women with abnormal uterine bleeding: Clinical practice guidelines of the French National College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF)].\",\"authors\":\"J-L Brun, G Plu-Bureau, C Huchon, X Ah-Kit, M Barral, P Chauvet, F Cornelis, M Cortet, P Crochet, V Delporte, G Dubernard, G Giraudet, A Gosset, O Graesslin, J Hugon-Rodin, L Lecointre, G Legendre, L Maitrot-Mantelet, L Marcellin, L Miquel, M Le Mitouard, C Proust, A Roquette, P Rousset, E Sangnier, M Sapoval, T Thubert, A Torre, F Trémollières, H Vernhet-Kovacsik, F Vidal, H Marret\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.gofs.2022.02.078\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide French guidelines for the management of women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A consensus committee of 26 experts was formed. A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the beginning of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industrial funding (i.e. pharmaceutical, or medical devices). The authors were advised to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasized.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The last guidelines from the Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français (CNGOF) on the management of women with AUB was published in 2008. The literature seems now sufficient for an update. The committee studied questions within 7 fields (diagnosis; adolescent; idiopathic AUB; endometrial hyperplasia and polyps; fibroids type 0 to 2; fibroids type 3 and more; adenomyosis). Each question was formulated in a PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) format and the evidence profiles were produced. The literature review and recommendations were made according to the GRADE® methodology.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The experts' synthesis work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 36 recommendations. Among the formalized recommendations, 19 present a strong agreement and 17 a weak agreement. Fourteen questions did not find any response in the literature. We preferred to abstain from recommending instead of providing expert advice.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The 36 recommendations made it possible to specify the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies of various clinical situations managed by the practitioner, from the simplest to the most complex.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51854,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF INDIAN PHILOSOPHY\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"345-373\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF INDIAN PHILOSOPHY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2022.02.078\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2022/3/4 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ASIAN STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF INDIAN PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gofs.2022.02.078","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/3/4 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:为临床治疗子宫异常出血(AUB)提供参考。设计:由26位专家组成共识委员会。在流程开始时制定了正式的利益冲突(COI)政策,并在整个过程中执行。整个指南过程是独立于任何工业资金(即制药或医疗设备)进行的。建议作者遵循建议评估、发展和评价分级(GRADE®)系统的规则来指导证据质量的评估。强调了在低质量证据面前提出强烈建议的潜在弊端。方法:2008年出版的最新一期《全国女性 复制与复制 复制与复制复制与复制(CNGOF)》女性AUB管理指南。这些文献现在看来足以更新了。委员会研究了7个领域的问题(诊断;青少年;特发性AUB;子宫内膜增生及息肉;0 ~ 2型肌瘤;3型及以上肌瘤;子宫腺肌症)。每个问题都以PICO(患者,干预,比较,结果)格式制定,并生成证据概要。根据GRADE®方法进行文献综述和建议。结果:专家的综合工作和GRADE方法的应用产生了36条建议。在正式提出的建议中,19项意见一致,17项意见不一致。有14个问题在文献中没有找到任何答案。我们宁愿不推荐而不提供专家意见。结论:这36条建议使医生能够明确各种临床情况的诊断和治疗策略,从最简单的到最复杂的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
[Management of women with abnormal uterine bleeding: Clinical practice guidelines of the French National College of Gynecologists and Obstetricians (CNGOF)].

Objective: To provide French guidelines for the management of women with abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB).

Design: A consensus committee of 26 experts was formed. A formal conflict-of-interest (COI) policy was developed at the beginning of the process and enforced throughout. The entire guidelines process was conducted independently of any industrial funding (i.e. pharmaceutical, or medical devices). The authors were advised to follow the rules of the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE®) system to guide assessment of quality of evidence. The potential drawbacks of making strong recommendations in the presence of low-quality evidence were emphasized.

Methods: The last guidelines from the Collège national des gynécologues et obstétriciens français (CNGOF) on the management of women with AUB was published in 2008. The literature seems now sufficient for an update. The committee studied questions within 7 fields (diagnosis; adolescent; idiopathic AUB; endometrial hyperplasia and polyps; fibroids type 0 to 2; fibroids type 3 and more; adenomyosis). Each question was formulated in a PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome) format and the evidence profiles were produced. The literature review and recommendations were made according to the GRADE® methodology.

Results: The experts' synthesis work and the application of the GRADE method resulted in 36 recommendations. Among the formalized recommendations, 19 present a strong agreement and 17 a weak agreement. Fourteen questions did not find any response in the literature. We preferred to abstain from recommending instead of providing expert advice.

Conclusions: The 36 recommendations made it possible to specify the diagnostic and therapeutic strategies of various clinical situations managed by the practitioner, from the simplest to the most complex.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: The Journal of Indian Philosophy publishes articles on various aspects of Indian thought, classical and modern. Articles range from close analysis of individual philosophical texts to detailed annotated translations of texts. The journal also publishes more speculative discussions of philosophical issues based on a close reading of primary sources.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信