测定致密气页岩干酪根含量的新方法

L. Lawal, M. Mahmoud, A. Adebayo, Rizwan Husain Syed
{"title":"测定致密气页岩干酪根含量的新方法","authors":"L. Lawal, M. Mahmoud, A. Adebayo, Rizwan Husain Syed","doi":"10.2118/194808-MS","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Reservoir evaluation of source rock is still a challenge because the geochemical assessment of the kerogen content is complicated and time consuming. Existing traditional methods to characterize kerogen involves the removal of inorganic minerals which is a critical preliminary step. The incomplete isolation of kerogen may introduce some errors and uncertainties in kerogen content estimation. The alteration of kerogen microstructure during this process has also been documented. The current approach still requires input from geochemical measurement of total organic carbon (TOC) while the conversion of TOC to kerogen volume requires the precise value of a conversion factor and kerogen density. Overall, there is yet a standard lab or field scale approach to characterize kerogen content. These difficulties and uncertainties prompt the motivation to attempt a new methodology to quantify the kerogen content of unconventional shale from porosity measurements.\n Porosity is the basic rock property that is related to the volumetric average of pore space. The distinction between the total and effective porosity is meaningless for shale and this characteristic property has enabled the preservation of its organic content. The recent popularity and growth of different measurement techniques is in part closely tied to the near zero porosity of shale. Two special cases of practical interest are NMR and density porosity measurements which can both be measured in the rock physics lab and well logs. NMR porosity is sensitive to 1H which is naturally enriched in kerogen whereas density porosity must be calibrated to the mineral matrix.\n Based on porosity measurements, the emerging aproach is that the kerogen volume fraction is the contrast between NMR and density porosity. Although, the theoretical basis of this approach is not satisfactory, it is straightforward and far less complicated than the existing approaches to quantify kerogen content. We investigate this concept further based on laboratory measurement. We conducted laboratory measurements of NMR porosity, bulk density, grain density and TOC on Qusaiba shale to characterize its kerogen content. In our approach, we conducted the NMR experiment on the shale samples in the dry state without fluid saturation.","PeriodicalId":11321,"journal":{"name":"Day 3 Wed, March 20, 2019","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Novel Method to Determine Kerogen Content of Tight Gas Shale\",\"authors\":\"L. Lawal, M. Mahmoud, A. Adebayo, Rizwan Husain Syed\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/194808-MS\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Reservoir evaluation of source rock is still a challenge because the geochemical assessment of the kerogen content is complicated and time consuming. Existing traditional methods to characterize kerogen involves the removal of inorganic minerals which is a critical preliminary step. The incomplete isolation of kerogen may introduce some errors and uncertainties in kerogen content estimation. The alteration of kerogen microstructure during this process has also been documented. The current approach still requires input from geochemical measurement of total organic carbon (TOC) while the conversion of TOC to kerogen volume requires the precise value of a conversion factor and kerogen density. Overall, there is yet a standard lab or field scale approach to characterize kerogen content. These difficulties and uncertainties prompt the motivation to attempt a new methodology to quantify the kerogen content of unconventional shale from porosity measurements.\\n Porosity is the basic rock property that is related to the volumetric average of pore space. The distinction between the total and effective porosity is meaningless for shale and this characteristic property has enabled the preservation of its organic content. The recent popularity and growth of different measurement techniques is in part closely tied to the near zero porosity of shale. Two special cases of practical interest are NMR and density porosity measurements which can both be measured in the rock physics lab and well logs. NMR porosity is sensitive to 1H which is naturally enriched in kerogen whereas density porosity must be calibrated to the mineral matrix.\\n Based on porosity measurements, the emerging aproach is that the kerogen volume fraction is the contrast between NMR and density porosity. Although, the theoretical basis of this approach is not satisfactory, it is straightforward and far less complicated than the existing approaches to quantify kerogen content. We investigate this concept further based on laboratory measurement. We conducted laboratory measurements of NMR porosity, bulk density, grain density and TOC on Qusaiba shale to characterize its kerogen content. In our approach, we conducted the NMR experiment on the shale samples in the dry state without fluid saturation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11321,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 3 Wed, March 20, 2019\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 3 Wed, March 20, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/194808-MS\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 3 Wed, March 20, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/194808-MS","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

烃源岩储集层评价是一个具有挑战性的问题,因为烃源岩干酪根含量的地球化学评价复杂且耗时。现有的传统的干酪根表征方法涉及到无机矿物的去除,这是一个关键的初步步骤。干酪根的不完全分离会给干酪根含量的估计带来一些误差和不确定性。在此过程中,干酪根微观结构的变化也有文献记载。目前的方法仍然需要总有机碳(TOC)的地球化学测量输入,而TOC到干酪根体积的转换需要转换因子和干酪根密度的精确值。总的来说,还没有一个标准的实验室或现场规模的方法来表征干酪根含量。这些困难和不确定性促使人们尝试一种新的方法,通过孔隙度测量来量化非常规页岩的干酪根含量。孔隙度是岩石的基本性质,与孔隙空间的体积平均值有关。总孔隙度和有效孔隙度的区别对页岩来说是没有意义的,这种特性使其有机含量得以保存。近年来各种测量技术的流行和发展,在一定程度上与页岩接近零孔隙度密切相关。具有实际意义的两种特殊情况是核磁共振和密度孔隙度测量,它们既可以在岩石物理实验室测量,也可以在测井中测量。核磁共振孔隙度对天然富含干酪根的1H敏感,而密度孔隙度必须根据矿物基质进行校准。基于孔隙度测量,新兴的方法是干酪根体积分数是核磁共振和密度孔隙度之间的对比。虽然这种方法的理论基础并不令人满意,但它比现有的量化干酪根含量的方法简单明了,而且远没有那么复杂。我们在实验室测量的基础上进一步研究了这个概念。通过对秋柴坝页岩核磁共振孔隙度、体积密度、颗粒密度和TOC的室内测量,对其干酪根含量进行表征。在我们的方法中,我们在没有流体饱和的干燥状态下对页岩样品进行了核磁共振实验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Novel Method to Determine Kerogen Content of Tight Gas Shale
Reservoir evaluation of source rock is still a challenge because the geochemical assessment of the kerogen content is complicated and time consuming. Existing traditional methods to characterize kerogen involves the removal of inorganic minerals which is a critical preliminary step. The incomplete isolation of kerogen may introduce some errors and uncertainties in kerogen content estimation. The alteration of kerogen microstructure during this process has also been documented. The current approach still requires input from geochemical measurement of total organic carbon (TOC) while the conversion of TOC to kerogen volume requires the precise value of a conversion factor and kerogen density. Overall, there is yet a standard lab or field scale approach to characterize kerogen content. These difficulties and uncertainties prompt the motivation to attempt a new methodology to quantify the kerogen content of unconventional shale from porosity measurements. Porosity is the basic rock property that is related to the volumetric average of pore space. The distinction between the total and effective porosity is meaningless for shale and this characteristic property has enabled the preservation of its organic content. The recent popularity and growth of different measurement techniques is in part closely tied to the near zero porosity of shale. Two special cases of practical interest are NMR and density porosity measurements which can both be measured in the rock physics lab and well logs. NMR porosity is sensitive to 1H which is naturally enriched in kerogen whereas density porosity must be calibrated to the mineral matrix. Based on porosity measurements, the emerging aproach is that the kerogen volume fraction is the contrast between NMR and density porosity. Although, the theoretical basis of this approach is not satisfactory, it is straightforward and far less complicated than the existing approaches to quantify kerogen content. We investigate this concept further based on laboratory measurement. We conducted laboratory measurements of NMR porosity, bulk density, grain density and TOC on Qusaiba shale to characterize its kerogen content. In our approach, we conducted the NMR experiment on the shale samples in the dry state without fluid saturation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信