从业者对尼日利亚研究-推广-农民-投入联动系统的挑战和有效性的看法

M. Koyenikan, F. Omoregbee
{"title":"从业者对尼日利亚研究-推广-农民-投入联动系统的挑战和有效性的看法","authors":"M. Koyenikan, F. Omoregbee","doi":"10.4314/JDCS.V4I2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Agricultural technology system (ATS), which, in Nigeria, is called the Research-Extension-Farmer-Input Linkage System [REFILS] comprises individuals who are expected to interact and effectively perform activities geared towards generation, dissemination, supply and use of innovations to achieve food security and poverty alleviation. However, the impact of the system is far below expectation due to challenges experienced by components of the linkage system. This study therefore assessed research and extension practitioners’ perception of the component-wise challenges and effectiveness of Nigeria’s REFILS. The seventy two (72) high calibre research and extension practitioners who participated in the National Extension Planning Review Meeting (NEPRM) for 2010 constituted the respondents. Findings show that practitioners were mostly males (75%), mean age=50.1 years, years of experience ( X=21.3years) and 75% had post graduate degrees. The study also revealed weak perception of linkage effectiveness (grand X =2.016) with report writing ( X=2.671), management interactions ( X =2.522), policy formulation ( X =2.387), as activities with strongest linkage effectiveness. Linkage effectiveness scores were weak in activities such as mass media communication ( X =1.298), link with input and service providers ( X =1.314), liaison services ( X =1.429) and joint programme implementation reviews ( X =1.462). Furthermore, analysis showed significant relationships between sex (r=-0.690), educational qualification (r=0.598) and years of working experience (r=0.506). Component-wise, most  serious challenges (≥50% indication) to REFILS effectiveness include poor  motivation, inadequate and erratic funding, dearth of capacity building opportunities, inadequate capital for farmers, absence of strong farmers’ organizations, poor participation of input agencies and poor coordination. The study concludes that practitioners were weak in linkage effectiveness, especially in field level activities due to various component-wise challenges. The study recommends improved funding support and involvement of relevant stakeholders, especially farmers’ organizations and input agencies in REFILS activities by government, private and donor agencies to enhance food security in Nigeria and by extension Africa. Keywords : Agricultural technology systems, linkage effectiveness, challenges, practitioners, Nigeria","PeriodicalId":85725,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of development communication","volume":"55 1","pages":"416-427"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Practitioners’ perception of challenges and effectiveness of Nigerian research-extensionfarmer- input linkage systems\",\"authors\":\"M. Koyenikan, F. Omoregbee\",\"doi\":\"10.4314/JDCS.V4I2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Agricultural technology system (ATS), which, in Nigeria, is called the Research-Extension-Farmer-Input Linkage System [REFILS] comprises individuals who are expected to interact and effectively perform activities geared towards generation, dissemination, supply and use of innovations to achieve food security and poverty alleviation. However, the impact of the system is far below expectation due to challenges experienced by components of the linkage system. This study therefore assessed research and extension practitioners’ perception of the component-wise challenges and effectiveness of Nigeria’s REFILS. The seventy two (72) high calibre research and extension practitioners who participated in the National Extension Planning Review Meeting (NEPRM) for 2010 constituted the respondents. Findings show that practitioners were mostly males (75%), mean age=50.1 years, years of experience ( X=21.3years) and 75% had post graduate degrees. The study also revealed weak perception of linkage effectiveness (grand X =2.016) with report writing ( X=2.671), management interactions ( X =2.522), policy formulation ( X =2.387), as activities with strongest linkage effectiveness. Linkage effectiveness scores were weak in activities such as mass media communication ( X =1.298), link with input and service providers ( X =1.314), liaison services ( X =1.429) and joint programme implementation reviews ( X =1.462). Furthermore, analysis showed significant relationships between sex (r=-0.690), educational qualification (r=0.598) and years of working experience (r=0.506). Component-wise, most  serious challenges (≥50% indication) to REFILS effectiveness include poor  motivation, inadequate and erratic funding, dearth of capacity building opportunities, inadequate capital for farmers, absence of strong farmers’ organizations, poor participation of input agencies and poor coordination. The study concludes that practitioners were weak in linkage effectiveness, especially in field level activities due to various component-wise challenges. The study recommends improved funding support and involvement of relevant stakeholders, especially farmers’ organizations and input agencies in REFILS activities by government, private and donor agencies to enhance food security in Nigeria and by extension Africa. Keywords : Agricultural technology systems, linkage effectiveness, challenges, practitioners, Nigeria\",\"PeriodicalId\":85725,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Journal of development communication\",\"volume\":\"55 1\",\"pages\":\"416-427\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Journal of development communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4314/JDCS.V4I2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of development communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/JDCS.V4I2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

农业技术系统(ATS)在尼日利亚被称为“研究-推广-农民-投入联动系统”(REFILS),由个人组成,他们被期望相互作用并有效地开展活动,旨在产生、传播、供应和使用创新,以实现粮食安全和减贫。然而,由于联动系统各组成部分所面临的挑战,该系统的影响远远低于预期。因此,本研究评估了研究和推广从业者对尼日利亚REFILS的组成挑战和有效性的看法。参加2010年全国推广规划审查会议(NEPRM)的72名高水平研究和推广从业人员构成了受访者。调查结果显示,从业人员以男性居多(75%),平均年龄50.1岁,经验年限(X=21.3年),75%拥有研究生学位。研究还发现,人们对联动有效性的感知较弱(大X= 2.016),而报告写作(X=2.671)、管理互动(X= 2.522)、政策制定(X= 2.387)是联动有效性最强的活动。在诸如大众传媒传播(X =1.298)、与投入和服务提供者的联系(X =1.314)、联络服务(X =1.429)和联合方案实施审查(X =1.462)等活动中,联系有效性得分较弱。此外,分析显示性别(r=-0.690)、教育程度(r=0.598)和工作经验(r=0.506)之间存在显著关系。从组成部分来看,REFILS有效性面临的最严重挑战(≥50%指示)包括动机不足、资金不足和不稳定、缺乏能力建设机会、农民资金不足、缺乏强大的农民组织、投入机构参与不足和协调不力。该研究的结论是,由于各种组件方面的挑战,从业者在联系有效性方面很弱,特别是在实地一级的活动中。该研究建议改善资金支持和相关利益攸关方的参与,特别是农民组织和投入机构对政府、私营部门和捐助机构的REFILS活动的参与,以加强尼日利亚乃至非洲的粮食安全。关键词:农业技术体系,联动效应,挑战,从业者,尼日利亚
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Practitioners’ perception of challenges and effectiveness of Nigerian research-extensionfarmer- input linkage systems
The Agricultural technology system (ATS), which, in Nigeria, is called the Research-Extension-Farmer-Input Linkage System [REFILS] comprises individuals who are expected to interact and effectively perform activities geared towards generation, dissemination, supply and use of innovations to achieve food security and poverty alleviation. However, the impact of the system is far below expectation due to challenges experienced by components of the linkage system. This study therefore assessed research and extension practitioners’ perception of the component-wise challenges and effectiveness of Nigeria’s REFILS. The seventy two (72) high calibre research and extension practitioners who participated in the National Extension Planning Review Meeting (NEPRM) for 2010 constituted the respondents. Findings show that practitioners were mostly males (75%), mean age=50.1 years, years of experience ( X=21.3years) and 75% had post graduate degrees. The study also revealed weak perception of linkage effectiveness (grand X =2.016) with report writing ( X=2.671), management interactions ( X =2.522), policy formulation ( X =2.387), as activities with strongest linkage effectiveness. Linkage effectiveness scores were weak in activities such as mass media communication ( X =1.298), link with input and service providers ( X =1.314), liaison services ( X =1.429) and joint programme implementation reviews ( X =1.462). Furthermore, analysis showed significant relationships between sex (r=-0.690), educational qualification (r=0.598) and years of working experience (r=0.506). Component-wise, most  serious challenges (≥50% indication) to REFILS effectiveness include poor  motivation, inadequate and erratic funding, dearth of capacity building opportunities, inadequate capital for farmers, absence of strong farmers’ organizations, poor participation of input agencies and poor coordination. The study concludes that practitioners were weak in linkage effectiveness, especially in field level activities due to various component-wise challenges. The study recommends improved funding support and involvement of relevant stakeholders, especially farmers’ organizations and input agencies in REFILS activities by government, private and donor agencies to enhance food security in Nigeria and by extension Africa. Keywords : Agricultural technology systems, linkage effectiveness, challenges, practitioners, Nigeria
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信