满足高中阅读困难学生的需求:农村学校在做什么?

Q4 Social Sciences
W. Bursuck, S. Robbins, Kurt Lazaroff
{"title":"满足高中阅读困难学生的需求:农村学校在做什么?","authors":"W. Bursuck, S. Robbins, Kurt Lazaroff","doi":"10.35608/RURALED.V31I2.954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Implementing effective reading programs to meet the demands of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) represents an immense challenge for all high schools, but the challenges for rural high schools may be particularly acute. Rural schools have large concentrations of children living in poverty, greater per-pupil costs and low fiscal capacity, all of which can make meeting the reading demands of NCLB difficult. The purpose of this article is to report the results of research that examined the question of what rural high schools are doing to meet the needs of their struggling readers. The results of focus groups from a rural high school in the southeastern United States and a state-wide survey of rural high schools also in the southeastern United States are reported. The implications of these findings for future practice in rural high schools are discussed. Introduction Implementing effective reading instruction at the secondary level represents an immense challenge. On any given day reports showing that high percentages of high school students fail to meet even basic standards on high stakes tests of reading achievement are likely to appear in the broadcast and paper press. Annual yearly progress (AYP) as required by the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is a determining factor for school funding as well as a public indicator of school success. There is no shortage of suggestions from educational think tanks and interest groups telling high schools what they need to do to improve (Biancarosa & Snow, 2006; National Governors Association, 2005; The National Association of Secondary School Principals, 2005). With almost uncanny unanimity, these reports call for high schools to adopt research-based practices in the teaching of reading, engage in continual assessment of student reading performance, and provide extensive on-going professional development for teachers and staff to create a school-wide culture of literacy. The problem of meeting school reform initiatives such as NCLB may be particularly acute in rural high schools (Chance, 1993). Indeed, rural schools in many locations have large concentrations of poor children who are more likely to struggle with academics (Jimerson, 2005). Many rural schools are also in financial distress (Jimerson, 2005) giving administrators limited means to mount and maintain the school improvement process. Greater per-pupil-costs and low fiscal capacity can result in less money to pay for instructional assessment materials, attract quality teachers, and provide necessary faculty professional development (Harmon, 2007; Stephens, 1998). This lack of fiscal resources could result in the inability to implement the scientifically-based practices being recommended to improve student performance in reading. Also problematic in rural schools is that an inability to attract highly qualified content teachers due to lower competitive salaries and benefits can result in higher numbers of teachers teaching outside their area of expertise (Harmon, 2007). Teachers teaching outside of their area of expertise may be overly dependent on textbooks, resulting in greater reading demands on students and the need for more reading supports. Finally, the lack of fiscal resources in schools that are smaller physically could result in less space for special reading classes and specialized reading materials. Clearly, rural high schools may be at significant risk in meeting the reading demands of NCLB. Thus, it is important to find out how rural schools are faring in their efforts to meet increased societal demands for improved reading performance. It was with this concern in mind that we conducted two studies: a series of focus groups with students, parents and educators at a rural high school in the southeastern United States and an email survey of high school principals in a Southeastern state. The focus groups were aimed at clarifying the challenges rural high schools currently face in meeting the needs of struggling readers in high school. …","PeriodicalId":33740,"journal":{"name":"The Rural Educator","volume":"9 1","pages":"27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Meeting the Needs of Struggling Readers in High School: What are Rural Schools Doing?\",\"authors\":\"W. Bursuck, S. Robbins, Kurt Lazaroff\",\"doi\":\"10.35608/RURALED.V31I2.954\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Implementing effective reading programs to meet the demands of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) represents an immense challenge for all high schools, but the challenges for rural high schools may be particularly acute. Rural schools have large concentrations of children living in poverty, greater per-pupil costs and low fiscal capacity, all of which can make meeting the reading demands of NCLB difficult. The purpose of this article is to report the results of research that examined the question of what rural high schools are doing to meet the needs of their struggling readers. The results of focus groups from a rural high school in the southeastern United States and a state-wide survey of rural high schools also in the southeastern United States are reported. The implications of these findings for future practice in rural high schools are discussed. Introduction Implementing effective reading instruction at the secondary level represents an immense challenge. On any given day reports showing that high percentages of high school students fail to meet even basic standards on high stakes tests of reading achievement are likely to appear in the broadcast and paper press. Annual yearly progress (AYP) as required by the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is a determining factor for school funding as well as a public indicator of school success. There is no shortage of suggestions from educational think tanks and interest groups telling high schools what they need to do to improve (Biancarosa & Snow, 2006; National Governors Association, 2005; The National Association of Secondary School Principals, 2005). With almost uncanny unanimity, these reports call for high schools to adopt research-based practices in the teaching of reading, engage in continual assessment of student reading performance, and provide extensive on-going professional development for teachers and staff to create a school-wide culture of literacy. The problem of meeting school reform initiatives such as NCLB may be particularly acute in rural high schools (Chance, 1993). Indeed, rural schools in many locations have large concentrations of poor children who are more likely to struggle with academics (Jimerson, 2005). Many rural schools are also in financial distress (Jimerson, 2005) giving administrators limited means to mount and maintain the school improvement process. Greater per-pupil-costs and low fiscal capacity can result in less money to pay for instructional assessment materials, attract quality teachers, and provide necessary faculty professional development (Harmon, 2007; Stephens, 1998). This lack of fiscal resources could result in the inability to implement the scientifically-based practices being recommended to improve student performance in reading. Also problematic in rural schools is that an inability to attract highly qualified content teachers due to lower competitive salaries and benefits can result in higher numbers of teachers teaching outside their area of expertise (Harmon, 2007). Teachers teaching outside of their area of expertise may be overly dependent on textbooks, resulting in greater reading demands on students and the need for more reading supports. Finally, the lack of fiscal resources in schools that are smaller physically could result in less space for special reading classes and specialized reading materials. Clearly, rural high schools may be at significant risk in meeting the reading demands of NCLB. Thus, it is important to find out how rural schools are faring in their efforts to meet increased societal demands for improved reading performance. It was with this concern in mind that we conducted two studies: a series of focus groups with students, parents and educators at a rural high school in the southeastern United States and an email survey of high school principals in a Southeastern state. The focus groups were aimed at clarifying the challenges rural high schools currently face in meeting the needs of struggling readers in high school. …\",\"PeriodicalId\":33740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Rural Educator\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-12-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Rural Educator\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.35608/RURALED.V31I2.954\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Rural Educator","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35608/RURALED.V31I2.954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

实施有效的阅读计划以满足《不让一个孩子掉队法案》(NCLB)的要求,对所有高中来说都是一个巨大的挑战,但对农村高中来说,挑战可能尤为严峻。农村学校的贫困儿童集中程度高,学生人均成本高,财政能力低,这些都使满足NCLB的阅读需求变得困难。这篇文章的目的是报告一项研究的结果,该研究调查了农村高中正在做些什么来满足他们苦苦挣扎的读者的需求。报告了美国东南部一所农村高中的焦点小组的结果和美国东南部一所农村高中的全州调查结果。讨论了这些发现对未来农村高中实践的意义。在中学阶段实施有效的阅读教学是一项巨大的挑战。任何一天都有可能出现在广播和报纸上的报道显示,在高风险的阅读成绩测试中,有很高比例的高中生连基本标准都达不到。《不让一个孩子掉队法》(NCLB)要求的年度进度(AYP)是决定学校经费的一个因素,也是学校成功的一个公共指标。教育智库和利益团体的建议并不缺乏,他们告诉高中他们需要做些什么来改进(Biancarosa & Snow, 2006;全国州长协会,2005年;全国中学校长协会,2005)。这些报告几乎出奇的一致,呼吁高中在阅读教学中采用基于研究的实践,参与对学生阅读表现的持续评估,并为教师和员工提供广泛的持续专业发展,以创造全校范围的识字文化。在农村高中,满足学校改革倡议(如NCLB)的问题可能特别尖锐(Chance, 1993)。事实上,许多地方的农村学校集中了大量贫困儿童,他们更有可能在学业上挣扎(Jimerson, 2005)。许多农村学校也处于财政困境(Jimerson, 2005),这给了管理者有限的手段来进行和维持学校的改进过程。较高的学生人均成本和较低的财政能力可能导致支付教学评估材料、吸引优质教师和提供必要的教师专业发展的资金减少(哈蒙,2007;史蒂芬斯,1998)。财政资源的缺乏可能导致无法实施建议的以科学为基础的实践,以提高学生的阅读成绩。农村学校的另一个问题是,由于工资和福利竞争力较低,无法吸引高素质的内容教师,这可能导致更多的教师在他们的专业领域之外教书(哈蒙,2007)。非专业领域教学的教师可能会过度依赖教科书,导致对学生的阅读要求更高,需要更多的阅读支持。最后,由于学校的规模较小,财政资源的缺乏可能导致特殊阅读课和专业阅读材料的空间较少。显然,农村高中在满足NCLB的阅读要求方面可能面临重大风险。因此,了解农村学校如何努力满足社会对提高阅读成绩的日益增长的要求是很重要的。带着这种担忧,我们进行了两项研究:在美国东南部的一所农村高中,对学生、家长和教育工作者进行了一系列的焦点小组调查,并对东南部一个州的高中校长进行了电子邮件调查。焦点小组的目的是澄清农村高中目前在满足高中阅读困难学生的需要方面面临的挑战。…
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Meeting the Needs of Struggling Readers in High School: What are Rural Schools Doing?
Implementing effective reading programs to meet the demands of the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) represents an immense challenge for all high schools, but the challenges for rural high schools may be particularly acute. Rural schools have large concentrations of children living in poverty, greater per-pupil costs and low fiscal capacity, all of which can make meeting the reading demands of NCLB difficult. The purpose of this article is to report the results of research that examined the question of what rural high schools are doing to meet the needs of their struggling readers. The results of focus groups from a rural high school in the southeastern United States and a state-wide survey of rural high schools also in the southeastern United States are reported. The implications of these findings for future practice in rural high schools are discussed. Introduction Implementing effective reading instruction at the secondary level represents an immense challenge. On any given day reports showing that high percentages of high school students fail to meet even basic standards on high stakes tests of reading achievement are likely to appear in the broadcast and paper press. Annual yearly progress (AYP) as required by the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) is a determining factor for school funding as well as a public indicator of school success. There is no shortage of suggestions from educational think tanks and interest groups telling high schools what they need to do to improve (Biancarosa & Snow, 2006; National Governors Association, 2005; The National Association of Secondary School Principals, 2005). With almost uncanny unanimity, these reports call for high schools to adopt research-based practices in the teaching of reading, engage in continual assessment of student reading performance, and provide extensive on-going professional development for teachers and staff to create a school-wide culture of literacy. The problem of meeting school reform initiatives such as NCLB may be particularly acute in rural high schools (Chance, 1993). Indeed, rural schools in many locations have large concentrations of poor children who are more likely to struggle with academics (Jimerson, 2005). Many rural schools are also in financial distress (Jimerson, 2005) giving administrators limited means to mount and maintain the school improvement process. Greater per-pupil-costs and low fiscal capacity can result in less money to pay for instructional assessment materials, attract quality teachers, and provide necessary faculty professional development (Harmon, 2007; Stephens, 1998). This lack of fiscal resources could result in the inability to implement the scientifically-based practices being recommended to improve student performance in reading. Also problematic in rural schools is that an inability to attract highly qualified content teachers due to lower competitive salaries and benefits can result in higher numbers of teachers teaching outside their area of expertise (Harmon, 2007). Teachers teaching outside of their area of expertise may be overly dependent on textbooks, resulting in greater reading demands on students and the need for more reading supports. Finally, the lack of fiscal resources in schools that are smaller physically could result in less space for special reading classes and specialized reading materials. Clearly, rural high schools may be at significant risk in meeting the reading demands of NCLB. Thus, it is important to find out how rural schools are faring in their efforts to meet increased societal demands for improved reading performance. It was with this concern in mind that we conducted two studies: a series of focus groups with students, parents and educators at a rural high school in the southeastern United States and an email survey of high school principals in a Southeastern state. The focus groups were aimed at clarifying the challenges rural high schools currently face in meeting the needs of struggling readers in high school. …
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The Rural Educator
The Rural Educator Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信