{"title":"铝硅酸盐陶瓷阈值强度的退火研究","authors":"L. Wong, S. Laurich-McIntyre, R. Bradt","doi":"10.1111/J.1551-2916.1988.TB00280.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Annealing an aluminosilicate ceramic modified the strength distribution by creating a threshold strength level, which was readily observed on a Weibull plot. The threshold strength appeared to develop through surface-defect healing or modification and was maximized for annealing at 1,200{degree}C. It deteriorated for higher temperature annealing heat treatments, coincident with the extensive growth of large mullite crystals within the microstructure.","PeriodicalId":7260,"journal":{"name":"Advanced Ceramic Materials","volume":"79 1","pages":"569-574"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Development of a threshold strength in an aluminosilicate ceramic by annealing\",\"authors\":\"L. Wong, S. Laurich-McIntyre, R. Bradt\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/J.1551-2916.1988.TB00280.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Annealing an aluminosilicate ceramic modified the strength distribution by creating a threshold strength level, which was readily observed on a Weibull plot. The threshold strength appeared to develop through surface-defect healing or modification and was maximized for annealing at 1,200{degree}C. It deteriorated for higher temperature annealing heat treatments, coincident with the extensive growth of large mullite crystals within the microstructure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":7260,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced Ceramic Materials\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"569-574\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1988-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced Ceramic Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1551-2916.1988.TB00280.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced Ceramic Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1551-2916.1988.TB00280.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Development of a threshold strength in an aluminosilicate ceramic by annealing
Annealing an aluminosilicate ceramic modified the strength distribution by creating a threshold strength level, which was readily observed on a Weibull plot. The threshold strength appeared to develop through surface-defect healing or modification and was maximized for annealing at 1,200{degree}C. It deteriorated for higher temperature annealing heat treatments, coincident with the extensive growth of large mullite crystals within the microstructure.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
