培训干预对护生患者-呼吸机不同步检测的影响

Francesco Gravante, F. Crisci, Luigi Palmieri, L. Cecere, Cristiano Fusi, Enrico Bulleri, L. Pisani, S. Bambi
{"title":"培训干预对护生患者-呼吸机不同步检测的影响","authors":"Francesco Gravante, F. Crisci, Luigi Palmieri, L. Cecere, Cristiano Fusi, Enrico Bulleri, L. Pisani, S. Bambi","doi":"10.23750/abm.v93iS2.12716","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and aim of the work: Patient-ventilator asynchronies (PVA) are associated to negative outcomes for patients: increased respiratory work, mechanical ventilation time and ICU length of stay, and mortality. Some studies described the positive impact of a training intervention on the knowledge and attitudes of nurses in detecting PVA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a training intervention focused on detection of PVA. Methods: A before-after design on a single group of nursing students (University “L. Vanvitelli” in Naples) was used. The training intervention about detection of the correct respiratory waveform through graphic monitoring was conducted in a single edition live course of 2 hours, for 25 participants. Measurements of correct detection of PVA through specific competency assessment tool (closed-ended question) were performed before (T0), immediately after (T1) and at 1 month (T2) from the training intervention between January and February 2020. Results: 19 Nurse students completed the training. A total of 50 questionnaires were distributed (T0; n=19; T1; n=19; T2; n=12). PVA were correctly detected in 67.5% (77) of cases. Statistically significant difference There were differences in trainees’ performance between T0 and T1 [77,2% (CI 95%: 68,7% - 85,8%; p=0.001)] and between T0 and T2 [75% (CI 95%: 65,3% - 84,7%; p=0.001]. No significant difference was recorded between T1 and T2 (p=0.83). Conclusions: Nursing students increased their performance on analysis of the graphic monitoring of the respiratory waveforms and detection of asynchronies after a basic training intervention. These skills were retained after 1 month. (www.actabiomedica.it)","PeriodicalId":93849,"journal":{"name":"Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of a Training Intervention on Detection of Patient-Ventilator Asynchronies in Nursing Students\",\"authors\":\"Francesco Gravante, F. Crisci, Luigi Palmieri, L. Cecere, Cristiano Fusi, Enrico Bulleri, L. Pisani, S. Bambi\",\"doi\":\"10.23750/abm.v93iS2.12716\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background and aim of the work: Patient-ventilator asynchronies (PVA) are associated to negative outcomes for patients: increased respiratory work, mechanical ventilation time and ICU length of stay, and mortality. Some studies described the positive impact of a training intervention on the knowledge and attitudes of nurses in detecting PVA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a training intervention focused on detection of PVA. Methods: A before-after design on a single group of nursing students (University “L. Vanvitelli” in Naples) was used. The training intervention about detection of the correct respiratory waveform through graphic monitoring was conducted in a single edition live course of 2 hours, for 25 participants. Measurements of correct detection of PVA through specific competency assessment tool (closed-ended question) were performed before (T0), immediately after (T1) and at 1 month (T2) from the training intervention between January and February 2020. Results: 19 Nurse students completed the training. A total of 50 questionnaires were distributed (T0; n=19; T1; n=19; T2; n=12). PVA were correctly detected in 67.5% (77) of cases. Statistically significant difference There were differences in trainees’ performance between T0 and T1 [77,2% (CI 95%: 68,7% - 85,8%; p=0.001)] and between T0 and T2 [75% (CI 95%: 65,3% - 84,7%; p=0.001]. No significant difference was recorded between T1 and T2 (p=0.83). Conclusions: Nursing students increased their performance on analysis of the graphic monitoring of the respiratory waveforms and detection of asynchronies after a basic training intervention. These skills were retained after 1 month. (www.actabiomedica.it)\",\"PeriodicalId\":93849,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v93iS2.12716\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta bio-medica : Atenei Parmensis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23750/abm.v93iS2.12716","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

研究背景和目的:患者-呼吸机不同步(PVA)与患者的负面结果相关:呼吸功增加、机械通气时间和ICU住院时间以及死亡率。一些研究描述了培训干预对护士检测PVA的知识和态度的积极影响。本研究的目的是评估以PVA检测为重点的训练干预的效果。方法:对单组护理专业学生进行事前-事后设计。Vanvitelli(那不勒斯)被使用。通过图形监测检测正确呼吸波形的培训干预在2小时的单版现场课程中进行,25名参与者。通过特定的能力评估工具(封闭式问题)测量PVA的正确检测在2020年1月至2月的培训干预前(T0)、后(T1)和1个月(T2)进行。结果:19名护生完成培训。共发放问卷50份(T0;n = 19;T1;n = 19;T2;n = 12)。PVA检出率为67.5%(77例)。受训人员在T0和T1之间的表现差异[77,2%](CI 95%: 68,7% - 85,8%;p=0.001)] T0和T2之间[75% (CI 95%: 65,3% - 84,7%;p = 0.001)。T1与T2无显著差异(p=0.83)。结论:护生在基础训练干预后,在呼吸波形图形监测分析和不同步检测方面的表现有所提高。这些技能在1个月后被保留。(www.actabiomedica.it)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of a Training Intervention on Detection of Patient-Ventilator Asynchronies in Nursing Students
Background and aim of the work: Patient-ventilator asynchronies (PVA) are associated to negative outcomes for patients: increased respiratory work, mechanical ventilation time and ICU length of stay, and mortality. Some studies described the positive impact of a training intervention on the knowledge and attitudes of nurses in detecting PVA. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a training intervention focused on detection of PVA. Methods: A before-after design on a single group of nursing students (University “L. Vanvitelli” in Naples) was used. The training intervention about detection of the correct respiratory waveform through graphic monitoring was conducted in a single edition live course of 2 hours, for 25 participants. Measurements of correct detection of PVA through specific competency assessment tool (closed-ended question) were performed before (T0), immediately after (T1) and at 1 month (T2) from the training intervention between January and February 2020. Results: 19 Nurse students completed the training. A total of 50 questionnaires were distributed (T0; n=19; T1; n=19; T2; n=12). PVA were correctly detected in 67.5% (77) of cases. Statistically significant difference There were differences in trainees’ performance between T0 and T1 [77,2% (CI 95%: 68,7% - 85,8%; p=0.001)] and between T0 and T2 [75% (CI 95%: 65,3% - 84,7%; p=0.001]. No significant difference was recorded between T1 and T2 (p=0.83). Conclusions: Nursing students increased their performance on analysis of the graphic monitoring of the respiratory waveforms and detection of asynchronies after a basic training intervention. These skills were retained after 1 month. (www.actabiomedica.it)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信