评估基于手腕的手部运动触觉定向引导的角度精度

Jonggi Hong, Lee Stearns, Jon E. Froehlich, David Ross, Leah Findlater
{"title":"评估基于手腕的手部运动触觉定向引导的角度精度","authors":"Jonggi Hong, Lee Stearns, Jon E. Froehlich, David Ross, Leah Findlater","doi":"10.20380/GI2016.25","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Haptic guidance for the hand can offer an alternative to visual or audio feedback when those information channels are overloaded or inaccessible due to environmental factors, vision impairments, or hearing loss. We report on a controlled lab experiment to evaluate the impact of directional wrist-based vibro-motor feedback on hand movement, comparing lower-fidelity (4-motor) and higher-fidelity (8-motor) wristbands. Twenty blindfolded participants completed a series of trials, which consisted of interpreting a haptic stimulus and executing a 2D directional movement on a touchscreen. We compare the two conditions in terms of movement error and trial speed, but also analyze the impact of specific directions on performance. Our results show that doubling the number of haptic motors reduces directional movement error but not to the extent expected. We also empirically derive an apparent lower bound in accuracy of ~25° in interpreting and executing on the directional haptic signal.","PeriodicalId":93493,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. Graphics Interface (Conference)","volume":"59 1","pages":"195-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating Angular Accuracy of Wrist-based Haptic Directional Guidance for Hand Movement\",\"authors\":\"Jonggi Hong, Lee Stearns, Jon E. Froehlich, David Ross, Leah Findlater\",\"doi\":\"10.20380/GI2016.25\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Haptic guidance for the hand can offer an alternative to visual or audio feedback when those information channels are overloaded or inaccessible due to environmental factors, vision impairments, or hearing loss. We report on a controlled lab experiment to evaluate the impact of directional wrist-based vibro-motor feedback on hand movement, comparing lower-fidelity (4-motor) and higher-fidelity (8-motor) wristbands. Twenty blindfolded participants completed a series of trials, which consisted of interpreting a haptic stimulus and executing a 2D directional movement on a touchscreen. We compare the two conditions in terms of movement error and trial speed, but also analyze the impact of specific directions on performance. Our results show that doubling the number of haptic motors reduces directional movement error but not to the extent expected. We also empirically derive an apparent lower bound in accuracy of ~25° in interpreting and executing on the directional haptic signal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93493,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. Graphics Interface (Conference)\",\"volume\":\"59 1\",\"pages\":\"195-200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. Graphics Interface (Conference)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20380/GI2016.25\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. Graphics Interface (Conference)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20380/GI2016.25","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

当这些信息通道由于环境因素、视力障碍或听力损失而过载或无法访问时,手部触觉指导可以提供视觉或音频反馈的替代方案。我们报告了一项受控的实验室实验,以评估定向腕部振动电机反馈对手部运动的影响,比较了低保真度(4个电机)和高保真度(8个电机)腕带。20名被蒙住眼睛的参与者完成了一系列的试验,其中包括解释触觉刺激和在触摸屏上执行2D方向运动。我们在运动误差和试验速度方面比较了两种情况,并分析了具体方向对性能的影响。我们的研究结果表明,将触觉马达的数量增加一倍可以减少方向运动误差,但没有达到预期的程度。我们还通过经验推导出了在解释和执行定向触觉信号时精度约为25°的明显下限。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluating Angular Accuracy of Wrist-based Haptic Directional Guidance for Hand Movement
Haptic guidance for the hand can offer an alternative to visual or audio feedback when those information channels are overloaded or inaccessible due to environmental factors, vision impairments, or hearing loss. We report on a controlled lab experiment to evaluate the impact of directional wrist-based vibro-motor feedback on hand movement, comparing lower-fidelity (4-motor) and higher-fidelity (8-motor) wristbands. Twenty blindfolded participants completed a series of trials, which consisted of interpreting a haptic stimulus and executing a 2D directional movement on a touchscreen. We compare the two conditions in terms of movement error and trial speed, but also analyze the impact of specific directions on performance. Our results show that doubling the number of haptic motors reduces directional movement error but not to the extent expected. We also empirically derive an apparent lower bound in accuracy of ~25° in interpreting and executing on the directional haptic signal.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信