{"title":"一种乐器的结构动力分析:藏族唱碗","authors":"B. Limkar, G. Chandekar","doi":"10.1080/17459737.2021.1871788","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Operational Modal Analysis (OMA) of Tibetan singing bowl is performed to extract natural frequencies and mode shapes without measuring excitation data. It is kept free on a rigid surface, which is a common way of playing this musical instrument. OMA results are validated using Experimental Modal Analysis (EMA) and Numerical Methods using FEA. Numerical simulations using ANSYS® software establishes a benchmark for EMA results. The input and response data for 144 response points are collected using instrumented hammer and accelerometer, connected to a four-channel FFT analyser. A self-generated MATLAB® code processes the response signals for EMA and OMA. For natural frequencies, the absolute error lies within 6%, except for the first mode. For mode shapes, the Modal Assurance Criteria (MAC) value is more than 70%, except for the fourth mode. Thus, OMA is the best available method compared to the EMA and Numerical method using FEA for structural analysis under actual performance conditions.","PeriodicalId":50138,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Mathematics and Music","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Structural dynamic analysis of a musical instrument: Tibetan singing bowl\",\"authors\":\"B. Limkar, G. Chandekar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17459737.2021.1871788\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Operational Modal Analysis (OMA) of Tibetan singing bowl is performed to extract natural frequencies and mode shapes without measuring excitation data. It is kept free on a rigid surface, which is a common way of playing this musical instrument. OMA results are validated using Experimental Modal Analysis (EMA) and Numerical Methods using FEA. Numerical simulations using ANSYS® software establishes a benchmark for EMA results. The input and response data for 144 response points are collected using instrumented hammer and accelerometer, connected to a four-channel FFT analyser. A self-generated MATLAB® code processes the response signals for EMA and OMA. For natural frequencies, the absolute error lies within 6%, except for the first mode. For mode shapes, the Modal Assurance Criteria (MAC) value is more than 70%, except for the fourth mode. Thus, OMA is the best available method compared to the EMA and Numerical method using FEA for structural analysis under actual performance conditions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Mathematics and Music\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Mathematics and Music\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17459737.2021.1871788\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Mathematics and Music","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17459737.2021.1871788","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Structural dynamic analysis of a musical instrument: Tibetan singing bowl
Operational Modal Analysis (OMA) of Tibetan singing bowl is performed to extract natural frequencies and mode shapes without measuring excitation data. It is kept free on a rigid surface, which is a common way of playing this musical instrument. OMA results are validated using Experimental Modal Analysis (EMA) and Numerical Methods using FEA. Numerical simulations using ANSYS® software establishes a benchmark for EMA results. The input and response data for 144 response points are collected using instrumented hammer and accelerometer, connected to a four-channel FFT analyser. A self-generated MATLAB® code processes the response signals for EMA and OMA. For natural frequencies, the absolute error lies within 6%, except for the first mode. For mode shapes, the Modal Assurance Criteria (MAC) value is more than 70%, except for the fourth mode. Thus, OMA is the best available method compared to the EMA and Numerical method using FEA for structural analysis under actual performance conditions.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Mathematics and Music aims to advance the use of mathematical modelling and computation in music theory. The Journal focuses on mathematical approaches to musical structures and processes, including mathematical investigations into music-theoretic or compositional issues as well as mathematically motivated analyses of musical works or performances. In consideration of the deep unsolved ontological and epistemological questions concerning knowledge about music, the Journal is open to a broad array of methodologies and topics, particularly those outside of established research fields such as acoustics, sound engineering, auditory perception, linguistics etc.