S. A. Chekalova, P. I. Khramtsov, E. V. Antonova, N. O. Berezina, E. Karpovich, Anastasia O. Marinina, A. M. Kurgansky, V. V. Katunova
{"title":"一年级学生学习活动的焦虑与功能准备","authors":"S. A. Chekalova, P. I. Khramtsov, E. V. Antonova, N. O. Berezina, E. Karpovich, Anastasia O. Marinina, A. M. Kurgansky, V. V. Katunova","doi":"10.46563/1560-9561-2023-26-1-54-60","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction. The modern system of primary education dictates high requirements to children, which determines the relevance of the study of the child’s functional readiness for schooling. The child’s readiness for school provides an ability to fully satisfy conditions of systematic education and includes intellectual, emotional and social aspects. The emotional state of the child and the level of anxiety are important factors reflecting the adequacy of school adaptation during this period. \nObjective: assessment of anxiety and functional readiness for being taugh tin first-graders. \nMaterials and methods. There were conducted survey and testing of sixty one 7–8 years first-graders, including 31 boys (50.8%) and 30 girls (49.2%). The children were taught in different classes: two classes with a separate form of education (only boys \n(19 students) and only girls (20 students)) and one class of joint education (together boys and girls — 22 students). Anxiety was assessed according to the method of “Scale of socio-situational anxiety” by O. Kondash (1973) adapted by V.V. Katunova (2020). The assessment of functional readiness for school was carried out using the Kern–Irasek orientation test of the school maturity. \nResults. When analyzing school and self-assessment anxiety, a significant predominance of excessive calmness was noted among 62.3% and 65.6% of children, respectively (95% CI 50.1–74.5% and 53.7–77.5%). When assessing school anxiety, a significant prevalence of normal anxiety for girls studying in a separate form of education — 55% (95% CI 33,2–76.8) was revealed in comparison with children studying in a joint form of education — 13.6% (95% CI –0.7–8.0). When considering aggressiveness, a significant prevalence of a low level of aggressiveness among girls — 35% (95% CI 14.1–55.9), and a high level among boys — 68.4% (95% CI 47.5–89.3) in comparison with children studying in the joint form of education (4.5%; 95% CI –4.2–13.2 and 27.3%; 95% CI 8.7–45.9, respectively). Reliable risks of high interpersonal anxiety and a high level of aggressiveness for boys studying in a separate form of education have been identified, which, however, requires further research. \nConclusion. The data obtained make it possible to identify a risk group among children for the formation of school maladaptation and inadequate response to the academic load.","PeriodicalId":52396,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Anxiety and functional readiness for learning activities in first-graders\",\"authors\":\"S. A. Chekalova, P. I. Khramtsov, E. V. Antonova, N. O. Berezina, E. Karpovich, Anastasia O. Marinina, A. M. Kurgansky, V. V. Katunova\",\"doi\":\"10.46563/1560-9561-2023-26-1-54-60\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction. The modern system of primary education dictates high requirements to children, which determines the relevance of the study of the child’s functional readiness for schooling. The child’s readiness for school provides an ability to fully satisfy conditions of systematic education and includes intellectual, emotional and social aspects. The emotional state of the child and the level of anxiety are important factors reflecting the adequacy of school adaptation during this period. \\nObjective: assessment of anxiety and functional readiness for being taugh tin first-graders. \\nMaterials and methods. There were conducted survey and testing of sixty one 7–8 years first-graders, including 31 boys (50.8%) and 30 girls (49.2%). The children were taught in different classes: two classes with a separate form of education (only boys \\n(19 students) and only girls (20 students)) and one class of joint education (together boys and girls — 22 students). Anxiety was assessed according to the method of “Scale of socio-situational anxiety” by O. Kondash (1973) adapted by V.V. Katunova (2020). The assessment of functional readiness for school was carried out using the Kern–Irasek orientation test of the school maturity. \\nResults. When analyzing school and self-assessment anxiety, a significant predominance of excessive calmness was noted among 62.3% and 65.6% of children, respectively (95% CI 50.1–74.5% and 53.7–77.5%). When assessing school anxiety, a significant prevalence of normal anxiety for girls studying in a separate form of education — 55% (95% CI 33,2–76.8) was revealed in comparison with children studying in a joint form of education — 13.6% (95% CI –0.7–8.0). When considering aggressiveness, a significant prevalence of a low level of aggressiveness among girls — 35% (95% CI 14.1–55.9), and a high level among boys — 68.4% (95% CI 47.5–89.3) in comparison with children studying in the joint form of education (4.5%; 95% CI –4.2–13.2 and 27.3%; 95% CI 8.7–45.9, respectively). Reliable risks of high interpersonal anxiety and a high level of aggressiveness for boys studying in a separate form of education have been identified, which, however, requires further research. \\nConclusion. The data obtained make it possible to identify a risk group among children for the formation of school maladaptation and inadequate response to the academic load.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52396,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Russian Journal of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Russian Journal of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46563/1560-9561-2023-26-1-54-60\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46563/1560-9561-2023-26-1-54-60","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
介绍。现代初等教育制度对儿童提出了很高的要求,这决定了研究儿童入学功能准备的相关性。儿童的入学准备提供了一种完全满足系统教育条件的能力,包括智力、情感和社会方面。儿童的情绪状态和焦虑程度是反映这一时期学校适应是否充分的重要因素。目的:评估一年级学生的教学焦虑和功能准备。材料和方法。对61名7-8年级一年级学生进行了调查和测试,其中男生31名(50.8%),女生30名(49.2%)。孩子们在不同的班级上课:两个班级采用单独的教育形式(只有男孩(19名学生)和女孩(20名学生)),一个班级采用联合教育(男孩和女孩一起- 22名学生)。焦虑的评估方法采用O. Kondash(1973)的“社会情境焦虑量表”(Scale of social -situational Anxiety),经V.V. Katunova(2020)改编。使用Kern-Irasek学校成熟度取向测验对学校功能准备进行评估。结果。在分析学校焦虑和自我评估焦虑时,62.3%和65.6%的儿童分别注意到过度冷静的显著优势(95% CI分别为50.1-74.5%和53.7-77.5%)。在评估学校焦虑时,与在联合教育中学习的儿童13.6% (95% CI - 0.7 - 8.0)相比,在单独教育形式中学习的女孩正常焦虑的显著患病率为55% (95% CI 33,2 - 76.8)。当考虑攻击性时,与在联合形式教育中学习的儿童相比,女孩的攻击性水平较低,占35% (95% CI 14.1-55.9),男孩的攻击性水平较高,占68.4% (95% CI 47.5-89.3)。95% CI -4.2-13.2和27.3%;95% CI分别为8.7-45.9)。在单独的教育形式中学习的男孩具有高度人际焦虑和高度攻击性的可靠风险已经被确定,然而,这需要进一步的研究。结论。所获得的数据使我们能够确定儿童中形成学校适应不良和对学业负担反应不足的风险群体。
Anxiety and functional readiness for learning activities in first-graders
Introduction. The modern system of primary education dictates high requirements to children, which determines the relevance of the study of the child’s functional readiness for schooling. The child’s readiness for school provides an ability to fully satisfy conditions of systematic education and includes intellectual, emotional and social aspects. The emotional state of the child and the level of anxiety are important factors reflecting the adequacy of school adaptation during this period.
Objective: assessment of anxiety and functional readiness for being taugh tin first-graders.
Materials and methods. There were conducted survey and testing of sixty one 7–8 years first-graders, including 31 boys (50.8%) and 30 girls (49.2%). The children were taught in different classes: two classes with a separate form of education (only boys
(19 students) and only girls (20 students)) and one class of joint education (together boys and girls — 22 students). Anxiety was assessed according to the method of “Scale of socio-situational anxiety” by O. Kondash (1973) adapted by V.V. Katunova (2020). The assessment of functional readiness for school was carried out using the Kern–Irasek orientation test of the school maturity.
Results. When analyzing school and self-assessment anxiety, a significant predominance of excessive calmness was noted among 62.3% and 65.6% of children, respectively (95% CI 50.1–74.5% and 53.7–77.5%). When assessing school anxiety, a significant prevalence of normal anxiety for girls studying in a separate form of education — 55% (95% CI 33,2–76.8) was revealed in comparison with children studying in a joint form of education — 13.6% (95% CI –0.7–8.0). When considering aggressiveness, a significant prevalence of a low level of aggressiveness among girls — 35% (95% CI 14.1–55.9), and a high level among boys — 68.4% (95% CI 47.5–89.3) in comparison with children studying in the joint form of education (4.5%; 95% CI –4.2–13.2 and 27.3%; 95% CI 8.7–45.9, respectively). Reliable risks of high interpersonal anxiety and a high level of aggressiveness for boys studying in a separate form of education have been identified, which, however, requires further research.
Conclusion. The data obtained make it possible to identify a risk group among children for the formation of school maladaptation and inadequate response to the academic load.